The Management of Sex Offenders: Perspectives for Psychiatry

REFERENCES

• Fagan PJ. Perspectives on sex and normality. In: Saleh FM, Grudzinskas AJ Jr., Bradford JM, Brodsky DJ, eds. Sex offenders: identification, risk assessment, treatment, and legal issues. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Brownmiller S. Against our will: men, women and rape. New York: Bantam, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin FS, Malin HM. Rape: a presumption of guilt? A presumption of severe punishment if guilty? J Expert Witness Trial Attorney Trial Judge 1990;5:7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin FS, Lehne GK, Malin HM, Hunt WP, Thomas K, Fuhrmanek J. The eroticized violent crime: a psychiatric perspective with six clinical examples. J Sex Addict Compulsivity 1997;4:9–31.
   Google Scholar
• Brakel SJ, Rock RS. The mentally disabled and the law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Kansas v. Hendricks, 117 S.Ct. 2072 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland EH. The diffusion of sexual psychopath laws. Am J Sociol 1950;56:142–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grudzinskas AJ, Brodsky DJ, Fedoroff JP, Zaitchik M, DiCataldo F, Clayfield JC. Sexual predator laws and their history. In: Saleh FM, Grudzinskas Jr AJ, Bradford JM, Brodsky DJ, eds. Sex offenders: identification, risk assessment, treatment, and legal issues. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff N. Courting the court: courts as agents for treatment and justice. In: Fisher WH, ed. Community-based interventions for criminal offenders with severe mental illness. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC: APA, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: APA, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed., text rev. Washington, DC: APA, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Money J. Lovemaps. New York: Irvington, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• von Krafft-Ebing R; Rehmanm FJ, trans. Psychopathia sexualis, with especial reference to the antipathic sexual instinct, a medico-forensic study. 12th ed. New York: Rebman, n.d. At http://www.archive.org/details/psychopathiasexu00krafuoft
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard R. The DSM diagnostic criteria for pedophilia. Arch Sex Behav 2010;39:304–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggrawal A. Forensic and medico-legal aspects of sexual crimes and unusual sexual practices. Boca Rotan, FL: CRC, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Lehne GK. Phenomenology of paraphilia: lovemap theory. In: Saleh FM, Grudzinskas AJ, Bradford JM, Brodsky DM, eds. Sex offenders: identification, risk assessment, treatment and legal issues. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Moser C, Kleinplatz PJ. DSM-IV-TR and the paraphilias: an argument for removal. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, San Francisco, May 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer RG, Saleh FM, Kim C. Assessment and treatment by general psychiatrists of outpatients with paraphilias. Paper presented at the World Psychiatric Association International Congress, Melbourne, Australia, November/December 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin FS, Malin HM, Dean S. Effects of statutes requiring psychiatrists to report suspected sexual abuse of children. Am J Psychiatry 1991;148:449–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin FS, Malin HM, Dean S. Flexibility in reporting child sexual abuse: a reply to Kalichman. Am J Psychiatry 1991;148:1619.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association Task Force on Sexually Dangerous Offenders. Dangerous sex offenders: a task force report of the American Psychiatric Association. Washington, DC: APA, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford J. The paraphilias, obsessive compulsive spectrum disorder, and the treatment of sexually deviant behaviour. Psychiatr Q 1999;70:209–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin F, Krout E. Pedophilia: diagnostic concepts treatment, and ethical considerations. Am J Forensic Psychiatry 1986;7:13–30.
   Google Scholar
• Dunsieth N. Flaws in the sexual addiction model. Curr Psychiatry 2002;1:37–9.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall WL, Marshall LE, Serran GA, Fernandez YM. Treating sexual offenders: an integrated approach. New York: Routledge, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks-Gordon B, Bilby C, Wells H. A systematic review of psychological interventions for sexual offenders I: randomized control trials. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol 2006;17:442–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malin HM, Saleh FM. Paraphilias: clinical and forensic considerations. Psychiatr Times 2007;24:32–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan H, Sadock B. Synopsis of psychiatry: behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry. 8th ed. Baltimore, MD: William & Wilkins, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin F. Sex offenders: a biomedical perspective and a status report on biomedical treatment. In: Greer J, Stuart I, eds. The sexual aggressor: current perspectives on treatment. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes S, Holmes R. Sex crimes: patterns and behavior. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Terry K, Mitchell E. Motivation and sex offender treatment efficacy: leading a horse to water and making it drink? Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 2001;45:663–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdon W, Gallagher C. Coercion and sex offenders controlling sex-offending behavior through incapacitation and treatment. Crim Justice Behav 2002;29:87–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall GCN. Sexual offender recidivism revisited: a meta-analysis of recent treatment analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995;63:802–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman LS, Martis B, Fichtner CG. Are sex offenders treatable? A research overview. Psychiatr Serv 1999;50:349–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh FM, Guidry LL. Psychosocial and biological treatment considerations for the paraphilic and non-paraphilic sex offender. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2003;31:486–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh FM. Pharmacotherapy of paraphilic sex offenders. In: Saleh FM, Grudzinskas AJ, Bradford JM, Brodsky D, eds. Sex offenders: identification, risk assessment, treatment and legal issues. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Dirck J, ed. Stedman's concise medical dictionary for the health professions. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Miethe T, McCorkle R. Crime profiles. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Freund K. Therapeutic sex drive reduction. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1980;287:5–38.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford JMW, Pawlak A. Double-blind placebo crossover study of cyproterone acetate in the treatment of the paraphilias. Arch Sex Behav 1993;22:383–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rösler A, Witzum E. Pharmacotherapy of paraphilias in the next millennium. Behav Sci Law 2000;18:43–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maletzky BM, Tolan A, McFarland B. The Oregon depo-Provera program: a five-year follow-up. Sex Abuse 2006;18:303–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford JMW. The neurobiology, neuropharmacology, and pharmacological treatment of the paraphilias and compulsive sexual behavior. Can J Psychiatry 2001;46:26–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill A, Briken P, Kraus C, Strohm K, Berner W. Differential pharmacological treatment of paraphilias and sex offenders. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 2003;47:407–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijs L, Gooren L. Hormonal and pharmacological interventions in the treatment of paraphilias: an update. J Sex Res 1996;33:273–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger RB, Kaplan MS. Depot-leuprolide acetate for treatment of paraphilias: a report of twelve cases. Arch Sex Behav 2001;30:409–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNally PJ, Brock P, Chabra R, Kaler M, Das M, Kamal M. Treatment of sex offenders with the long-acting GnRH analogue triptorelin—a case series. Eur Neuropsychopharamacol 2009;19(suppl 3):S628.
   Google Scholar
• Briken P, Nika E, Berner W. Treatment of paraphilia with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists. J Sex Marital Ther 2001;27:45–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh FM, Berlin FS. Sex hormones, neurotransmitters, and psychopharmacological treatments in men with paraphilic disorders. J Child Sex Abus 2003;12:233–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saleh FM. Serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the paraphilias. Newsl Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2004;29:12–3.
   Google Scholar
• Furby L, Weinrott M, Blackshaw L. Sex offender recidivism: a review. Psychol Bull 1989;105:3–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentky R, Burgess A. Forensic management of sexual offenders. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson RK, Gordon A, Harris AJR, First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sex Abuse 2002;14: 169–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lösel F, Schmucker M. The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: a comprehensive meta-analysis. J Exp Criminol 2005;1:117–46.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall WL, McGuire J. Effect sizes in the treatment of sexual offenders. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 2003;47:653–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence v. Texas, 123 S.Ct. 2472 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry. Committee on Psychiatry and the Law. Psychiatry and the sex psychopath: 30's to the 80's. New York: American Psychiatric Association, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Brakel SJ, Parry J, Weiner B. The mentally disabled and the law. 3rd ed. Chicago: American Bar Foundation, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy L, Brodsky D, Brakel J, Petrunik M, Fedoroff JP, Grudzinskas AJ. Community-based management of sex offenders: an examination of sex offender registries and community notification in the United States and Canada. In: Saleh FM, Grudzinskas AJ, Bradford JM, Brodsky DJ, eds. Sex offenders: identification, risk assessment, treatment, and legal issues. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon KE. The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies. J Consult Clin Psychol 2005;73:1154–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh FM, Malin HM, Grudzinskas AJ, Vitacco MJ. Paraphilias with co-morbid psychopathy: the clinical and legal significance to sex offender assessments. Behav Sci Law 2010;28:211–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Law Institute, Model Penal Code §4.01(1) [standard for insanity]. 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Kansas Annotated Statutes §59–29a02 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Grisso T. Ethical issues in evaluations for sex offender re-offending. Paper presented at the Sex Offender Re-offence Risk Prediction Training, Sinclair Seminars, Madison, WI, March 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Harris GT, Rice ME, Quinsey VL, Lalumiare ML, Boer D, Lang C. A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychol Assess 2003;15:413–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent GM, Maney SM, Hart SD. The use of actuarial risk assessment instruments with sex offenders. In: Saleh FM, Grudzinskas AJ, Bradford JM, Brodsky D, eds. Sex offenders: identification, risk assessment, treatment & legal issues. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hart SD, Michie C, Cooke D. Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: evaluating the ‘margins of error’ of group v. individual predictions of violence. Br J Psychiatry Suppl 2007;49:S60–5.
   Google Scholar