Minireview: Multiple receptor populations: Binding isotherms and their numerical analysis

References

• Adair G. S. The hemoglobin system. VI. The oxygen dissociation curve of hemoglobin. J. Biol. Chem. 1925; 63: 529–545
   Google Scholar
• Koshland D. E., Jr., Neméthy G., Filmer D. Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. Biochemistry 1966; 5: 365–385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monod J., Wyman J., Changeux J.-P. On the nature of allosteric transitions: A plausible model. J. Mol. Biol. 1965; 12: 88–118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frieden C. Treatment of enzyme kinetic data. II. The multisite case: Comparison of allosteric models and a possible new mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 1967; 242: 4045–4052
   Google Scholar
• Hill A. V. The combinations of haemoglobin with oxygen and with carbon monoxide. I. Biochem. J. 1913; 7: 471–480
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lineweaver H., Burk D. The determination of enzyme dissociation constants. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1934; 56: 658–666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scatchard G. The attractions of proteins for small molecules and ions. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1949; 51: 660–672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornish-Bowden A., Koshland D. E., Jr. Diagnostic uses of the Hill (logit and Nernst) plots. J. Mol. Biol. 1975; 95: 201–212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pliška V. Heterogenous binding sites in neurophysin-like molecules: Some theoretical and computational considerations. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1975; 248: 480–493
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Magar M. E. Data Analysis in Biochemistry and Biophysics. Academic Press, New York 1972; 401–528
   Google Scholar
• Deranleau D. A. Theory of the measurement of weak molecular complexes. I. General considerations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969; 91: 4044–4049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamness G. C., McGuire W. L. Scatchard plot: Common errors in correction and interpretation. Steroids 1975; 26: 538–542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NøArby J. G., Ottolenghi P., Jensen J. Scatchard plot: Common misinterpretation of binding experiments. Analyt. Biochem. 1980; 102: 318–320
   Google Scholar
• Klotz I. M. Numbers of receptor sites from Scatchard graphs: Facts and fantasies. Science 1982; 217: 1247–1249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klotz I. M. Ligand-receptor interactions: What we can and cannot learn from binding measurements. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1983; 4: 253–255
   Google Scholar
• Bürgisser E. Model testing in radioligand/receptor interaction by Monte Carlo simulation. J. Receptor Res. 1984; 3: 261–281
   Google Scholar
• Bürgisser E. Radioligand-receptor binding studies: What's wrong with the Scatchard analysis? Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1984; 5: 142–144
   Google Scholar
• Cheng Y.-C., Prusoff W. H. Relationship between the inhibition constant (Ki) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1973; 22: 3099–3108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson P. J., Rodbard D. An exact correction to the “Cheng-Prusoff” correction. J. Receptor Res. 1988; 8: 533–546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pliška V., Marbach P. Some biological activities of an “irreversible” antagonist of neurohypophyseal hormones, deamino-[Phe(4-BrCH2CONH)2]-oxytocin, and its isosteric analogue, deamino-[Phe(4-CH3CH2CONH)2]-oxytocin. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1978; 49: 213–222
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wieker H.-J., Johannes K.-J., Hess B. A computer program for the determination of kinetic parameters from sigmoidal steady-state kinetics. FEBS Letters 1979; 8: 178–185
   Google Scholar
• Atkins G. L. A simple digital-computer program for estimating the parameters of Hill equation. Eur. J. Biochem. 1973; 33: 175–180
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marquardt D. W. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math. 1963; 11: 431–441
   Google Scholar
• Lavrentev M. M., Romanov V. G., Shishatskii S. P. Ill-posed Problems of Mathematical Physics and Analysis, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, No. 64. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI 1986
   Google Scholar
• Tikhonov A. N., Arsenin V. Y. Solution of Ill-posed Problems, Scripta Series in Mathematics. V.H. Winston & Sons, Inc., Washington, DC 1977
   Google Scholar
• Munson P. J., Rodbard D. LIGAND: A versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems. Analyt. Biochem. 1980; 107: 220–239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechanick J. I., Peskin C. S. Resolution of steroid binding heterogeneity by Fourier-derived affinity spectrum analysis (FASA). Analyt. Biochem. 1986; 157: 221–235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuryev D. K. AFFINOGEN—a program for affinity spectrum construction. J. Immunol. Methods 1991; 139: 297–297
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tobler H. J., Engel G. Affinity spectra: A novel way for the evaluation of equilibrium binding experiments. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 1983; 322: 183–192
   Google Scholar
• Pliška V., Heiniger J., Müller-Lhotsky A., Pliska P., Ekberg B. Binding of oxytocin to uterine cells in vitro: Occurence of several binding site populations and reidentification of oxytocin receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 1986; 261: 16984–16989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pliška V., Kohlhauf Albertin H. Effect of Mg2+ on the binding of oxytocin to sheep myometrial cells. Biochem. J. 1991; 277: 97–101
   Google Scholar
• Rutschmann M. A., Heiniger J., Pliška V., Solms J. Formation of inclusion complexes of starch with different organic compounds. I. Method of evaluation of binding profiles with menthone as an example. Lebensmittel-Wiss. u. -Technol. 1989; 22: 240–244
   Google Scholar
• Borowiak D. S. Model Discrimination for Nonlinear Regression Models. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York 1989
   Google Scholar
• Draper N., Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd ed. J. Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York 1981; 141–192
   Google Scholar
• Dylewski T. J. Criteria for selecting curves for fitting to data. AIAA Journal 1979; 8: 1411–1415
   Google Scholar
• Scales L. E. Introduction to nonlinear optimalization. MacMillan Publ., Ltd., London 1985
   Google Scholar