Survey Estimates of Drug-Use Trends in Urban Communities: General Principles and Cautionary Examples

References

• American Association For Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rules for RDD Telephone Surveys and In-Person Household Surveys. American Association for Public Opinion Research, Ann Arbor, MI 1998
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. Task Force on Statistical Inference Initial Report. Board of Scientific Affairs, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 1996
   Google Scholar
• Beveridge A., Bucuvalas M., Kadushin C., Trippel K., Livert D. Targeting Respondents in Small Defined Geographic Areas: Experiences from a Large Scale Telephone Survey. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Norfolk, VA, May, 1997
   Google Scholar
• Buscema M. Artificial neural networks and complex social systems. I. Theory. Substance Use Misuse 1998; 33(1)v–xvii; 1–220
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bryk A. S., Raudenbush S. W. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Sage, Newbury Park, CA 1992
   Google Scholar
• Campbell D. T., Stanley J. C. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally, Chicago 1966
   Google Scholar
• Center For Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP). Fourth Annual Report of the National Evaluation of the Community Partnership Demonstration Grant Program. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD 1996
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA 1998, 1996 BRFSS Summary Prevalence Report.
   Google Scholar
• Cook T. D., Campbell D. T. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA 1979
   Google Scholar
• Di Lima S. N., Schust C. S. Community Health Education and Promotion: A Guide to Program Design and Evaluation. Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg, MD 1997
   Google Scholar
• Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel. April 30, 1996; 1A
   Google Scholar
• Furlong M. J., Casas J. M., Corral C., Gordon M. Changes in substance use patterns associated with a development of a community partnership project. Eval. Program Plann. 1997; 20: 299–305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Accounting Office (Gao). 1993, Drug Use Measurement: Strengths. Limitations, and Recommendations for Improvement. Report to Chairman of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives. Report Number GAO, PEMD-93–18
   Google Scholar
• Gustin Joseph. Personal communication. September, 1998
   Google Scholar
• Hallfors D., Rindskopf D., Stirrat M. Mela-Analysis of School Surveys to Assess Community Prevention Efforts. Paper presented at the Sixth Biennial CDC and ATSDR Symposium on Statistical Methods, Atlanta, GA, 1997
   Google Scholar
• Holder H. D. Planning for alcohol-problem prevention through complex systems modeling: Results from SlimCom. Substance Use Misuse 1998; 33(3)669–692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jellinek P. S., Hearn R. P. Fighting drug abuse at the local level: Can communities consolidate their resources into a single system of prevention, treatment, and aftercare?. Issues Sci. Technol. 1991; 7(4)78–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson L. D., Omalley P. M., Bachman J. G. National Survey Results on Drug Use from Monitoring the Future Study, 1975–1995: Volume 1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC 1996, (NIH Publication 96–4139)
   Google Scholar
• Kadushin C., Livert D., Ford J., Barreras R., Hofmann J., Kelner S., Trudeau K. Fighting Back Evaluation Survey Codebook. 1998, Unpublished report
   Google Scholar
• Kadushin C., Reber E., Saxe L., Livert D. The substance use system: Social and neighborhood environments associated with substance use and misuse. Substance Use Misuse 1998; 33(8)1681–1710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livert D., Kadushin C., Saxe L., Beveridge A., Rindskopf D., Tighe E., Hoffman J., Kelner S., Barreras R., Ford J. Fighting Back Evaluation Interim Report: Wave II General Population Survey. 1997, Report prepared for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
   Google Scholar
• Miami Coalition for A Drug-Free Community. Drug Use and Attitude Survey of the Dade County. Florida Public and Archdiocese Schools, Miami, FL March, 1994
   Google Scholar
• Miami Coalition for A Drug-Free Community. Miami, FL September, 1995, Community Partnership Program Close-out Report.
   Google Scholar
• Miller P. Review: Is “up” light‘.’ The National Household Survey on drug abuse. Public Opin. Q. 1998; 61: 627–641
   Google Scholar
• New York Times. September 1, 1992; 13
   Google Scholar
• New York Times. April 20, 1997; 4, Section 4
   Google Scholar
• Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, DC 1998
   Google Scholar
• Partnership for A Drug-Free America (PDFA) Newsletter. 1, Fall 94/Winter 95
   Google Scholar
• Rindskopf D., Livert D. The Utility of Multi-Level Models in the Evaluation of Community-Based Programs. 1998, Unpublished manuscript
   Google Scholar
• Rindskopf D., Saxe L. Zero effects in substance abuse programs: Avoiding false positives and false negatives in the evaluation of community-based programs. Eval. Rev. 1998; 22: 76–92
   Google Scholar
• Saxe L., Fine M. Social Experiments: Methods for Design and Evaluation. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA 1981
   Google Scholar
• Saxe L., Reber E., Hallfors D., Kadushin C., Jones D., Rindskopf D., Beveridge A. Think globally, act locally: Assessing the impact of community-based substance abuse prevention. Eval. Program Prev. 1997; 20: 357–366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah B. V., Barnwell B. G., Bieler G. S. SUDAAN Users Manual. Release 7.5. Research Triangle Institute, Triangle Park, NC 1997
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings (1993). Office of Applied Statistics SAMHSA. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Rockville, MD 1995
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Estimates of Drug Use Prevalence in Miami from the 1991 1994 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Methodological Report. Rockville, MD 1996a, (SAMHSA Working Paper. July 15. 1996. Prepared by M. Witt. L. Guess. J. Gfroerer. and D. Wright)
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Preliminary Estimates from the 1995 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Office of Applied Statistics SAMHSA. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Rockville, MD 1996b
   Google Scholar
• Turner C. F., Lessler J. T., Gfroerer J. C. Survey Measurement of Drug Use: Methodological Studies. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 1992, (DHHS Publication ADM 92–1929)
   Google Scholar
• Waksberg J. Sampling methods for random digit dialling. J. Ant. Stat. Assoc. 1978; 73: 44–46
   Google Scholar
• The Wall Street Journal. September 18, 1996; A1, A10
   Google Scholar
• Warner L. A., Kessler R. C., Hughes M., Anthony J. C., Nelson C. Prevalence and correlatives of drug use and dependence in the United States: Results from the national comorbidity survey. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1995; 52: 219–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin R. K., Kaftarian S. J., Yu P., Jansen M. A. Outcomes from CSAP's community partnership program: Findings from the national cross-site evaluation. Eval. Program Plann. 1997; 20(3)345–355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar