Evaluation of Consumer Participation Demonstration Projects in Five Australian Drug User Treatment Facilities: The Impact of Individual Versus Organizational Stability in Determining Project Progress

REFERENCES

• Australian Injecting and Illicit Drug Users League (AIVL). (2008). Treatment service users project: Final report. Canberra, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, G., & Hemsley, M. (2008). Consumer participation in mental health in Australia: What progress is being made? Australasian Psychiatry, 16(6), 446–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, J., Saxton, M., Madden, A., Bath, N., & Robinson, S. (2008a). Consumer participation in the planning and delivery treatment services: The current arrangements. Drug and Alcohol Review, 27, 130–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, J., Saxton, M., Madden, A., Bath, N., & Robinson, S. (2008b). Consumers’ and providers’ perspectives about consumer participation in drug treatment services: Is there support to do more? What are the obstacles? Drug and Alcohol Review, 27, 138–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, M., Freeman, A., & Walter, G. (2006). Carer participation in mental health service delivery. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 15, 189–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. (1998). Consumer focus collaboration. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, G. (2008). Involving users in developing health services: Representation is not enough; voices must be translated into action. BMJ, 336, 286–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crawford, M., Rutter, D., Manley, C., Weaver, T., Bhui, K., Fulop, N., (2002). Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ, 325, 1263–1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, C. (2008). Consumer involvement in dementia care research, policy and program: Report on Alzheimer's Australia research ltd travelling scholarship. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Institute for Primary Care, La Trobe University.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, J., & Neale, J. (2008). Involving drug users in treatment decisions: An exploration of potential problems. Drugs—Education Prevention & Policy, 15(2), 161–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortune, T., Maguire, N., & Carr, L. (2007). Older consumers’ participation in the planning and delivery of mental health care: A collaborative service development project. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54, 70–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, V., & Happell, B. (2007). Psychiatric nurses’ attitudes toward consumer and carer participation in care: Part 1—exploring the issues. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 8(4), 276–284.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Happell, B., & Roper, C. (2007). Consumer participation in mental health research: Articulating a model to guide practice. Australasian Psychiatry, 16(3), 237–241.
   Google Scholar
• Hassett, A., Fortune, T., & Smith, B. (2007). Mental health care for our ageing Australian population. Australasian Psychiatry, 15(6), 480–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton, T. (2010). Voices on choices: Working towards consumer-led alcohol and drug treatment. Hobart, Australia: The Social Action and Research Centre, Anglicare Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, T., Clark, E., Baird, J., & Lu, S. (2008). Mental health clinicians’ attitudes about consumer and consumer consultant participation in Australia: A cross-sectional survey design. Nursing and Health Sciences, 10, 78–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvoy, P., & Richards, D. (2003). Critical Realism: Away forward for evaluation research in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 43(4), 411–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Resource Centre for Consumer Participation in Health. (2004). Consumer and community participation self-assessment tools for hospitals. Retrieved October 17, 2007, from http://www.healthissuescentre.org.au/documents/items/2008/04/ 204590-upload-00001.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., & Damonze, G. (2009). Consumer participation in designing community based consumer-directed disability care: Lessons from a participatory action research-inspired project. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 22, 31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, B., Backmund, M., Hirsch, G., & Yim, C. (2007). The depiction of stigmatization in research about hepatitis C. International Journal of Drug Policy, 18(5), 364–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, S., Weaver, T., Agath, K., Albert, E., Rhodes, T., Ruttr, D., (2008). ‘They can't solve the problem with out us’: A qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives on user involvement in drug treatment services in England. Health and Social Care in the Community, 17(1), 54–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, S., Weaver, T., Agath, K., Rutter, D., Albert, E., & Crawford, M. (2009). User involvement in efforts to improve the quality of drug misuse services in England: A national survey. Drugs—Education Prevention & Policy, 16(4), 364–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, S., Weaver, T., & Crawford, M. (2010). Drug service user groups: Only a partial solution to the problem of developing user involvement. Drugs—Education Prevention & Policy, 17(1), 84–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005). Realist review—A new model of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 10(Suppl. 1), 21–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schauer, C., Everett, A., del Vecchio, P., & Anderson, L. (2007). Promoting the value and practice of shared decision-making in mental health care. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31(1), 54–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, S., Watson, S., Montague, R., & Stevenson, C. (2008). Set up to fail? Consumer participation in the mental health service system. Australasian Psychiatry, 16(6), 348–353.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Treloar, C., Fraser, S., & Valentine, K. (2007). Valuing methadone take-away doses: The contribution of service user perspectives to policy and practice. Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy, 14, 61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, D. (2007). Paradoxes in antiretrovial treatment for injecting drug users: Access, adherence and structural barriers in Asia and the former Soviet Union. International Journal of Drug Policy, 18, 246–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar