203
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Members, Isolates, and Liaisons: Meta-Analysis of Adolescents’ Network Positions and Their Smoking Behavior

&
Pages 612-622 | Published online: 10 Jun 2013

REFERENCES

  • Abel, G., Plumridge, L., & Graham, P. (2002). Peer, networks or relationships: Strategies for understanding social dynamics as determinants of smoking behavior. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 9, 325–338.
  • Alesci, N. L., Forster, J. L., & Blaine, T. B. (2003). Smoking visibility, perceived acceptability, and frequency in various locations among youth and adults. Preventive Medicine, 36, 272–281.
  • Alexander, C., Piazza, M., Mekos, D., & Valente, T. W. (2001). Peer networks and adolescent cigarette smoking: An analysis of the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29, 22–30.
  • Aloise-Young, P., Graham, J. W., & Hansen, W. B. (1994). Peer influence on smoking initiation during early adolescence: A comparison of group members and group outsiders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 281–287.
  • American Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation. (2009). Overview list –how many smokefree laws? Retrieved October 27, 2010, from the http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/mediaordlist.pdf
  • Arnett, J. J. (1999). Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered. American Psychologist, 54, 317–326.
  • Bloom, J. R., Stewart, S. L., Johnston, M., Banks, P., & Fobair, P. (2001). Sources of support and the physical and mental well-being of young women with breast cancer. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 1513–1524.
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis, version 2. Englewood, NJ: Biostat Inc.
  • Botvin, G. J., Backer, E., Botvin, E. M., Dusenbury, L., Cardwell, J., & Diaz, T. (1993). Factors promoting cigarette smoking among black youth: A causal modeling approach. Addictive Behaviors, 18, 397–405.
  • Botvin, G. J., Botvin, E. M., Baker, E., Dusenbury, L., & Goldberg, C. J. (1992). The false consensus effect: Predicting adolescents’ tobacco use from normative expectations. Psychological Reports, 70, 171–178.
  • Bradshaw, C. P., Sudhinaraset, M., Mmari, K., & Blum, R. W. (2010). School transitions among military adolescents: A qualitative study of stress and coping. School Psychology Review, 39, 84–105.
  • Bryant, A. L., Schulenberg, J., Bachman, J. G., O'Malley, P. M., & Johnson, L. D. (2000). Understanding the links among school misbehavior, academic achievement, and cigarette use: A national panel study of adolescents. Prevention Science, 1, 71–87.
  • Buunk, B. P., & Hoorens, V. (1992). Social support and stress: The role of social comparison and social exchange processes. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31, 445–457.
  • Chassin, L., Presson, C. C., Rose, J. S., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). The natural history of cigarette smoking from adolescence to adulthood: Demographic predictors of continuity and change. Health Psychology, 15, 478–484.
  • Chassin, L., Presson, C. C., Sherman, S. J., Corty, E., & Olsyavsky, R. (1984). Predicting the onset of cigarette smoking in adolescents: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 224–243.
  • Coalition on Smoking or Health (CSOH). (1995). State legislative actions on tobacco issues. Washington, DC: Coalition on Smoking or Health.
  • Cohen, J. M. (1977). Sources of peer group homogeneity. Sociology of Education, 50, 227–241.
  • Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. American Psychologist, 59, 676–684.
  • Cohen, S., Frank, E., Doyle, W. J., Skoner, D. P., Rabin, B. S., & Gwaltney, J. M., Jr. (1998). Types of stressors that increase susceptibility to the common cold in adults. Health Psychology, 17, 214–223.
  • Colby, S. M., Tiffany, S. T., Shiffman, S., & Niaura, R. S. (2000). Are adolescent smokers dependent on nicotine? A review of the evidence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 59, S83–S95.
  • Coleman, J. C. (1980). Friendship and the peer group in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 408–431). New York: Wiley.
  • Conrad, K. M., Flay, B. R., & Hill, D. (1992). Why children start smoking cigarettes: Predictors of onset. British Journal of Addiction, 87, 1711–1724.
  • Cutrona, C. E., & Cole, V. (2000). Optimizing support in the natural network. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 278–308). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • De Vries H., Candel, M., Engels, R., & Mercken, L. (2006). Challenges to the peer influence paradigm: Results for 12–13 year olds from six European countries from the European smoking prevention framework approach study. Tobacco Control, 15, 83–89.
  • Dolcini, M. M., Harper, G. W., Susan, E. W., Catania, J. A., & Ellen, J. M. (2005). Friends in the 'hood: Should peer-based health promotion programs target nonschool friendship networks? Journal of Adolescent Health, 36, 267.e6–267.e15.
  • Dunphy, D. C. (1963). The social structure of urban adolescent peer groups. Sociometry, 26, 230–246.
  • Eder, D. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58, 154–165.
  • Eiser, C., Walsh, S., & Eiser, J. R. (1986). Young children's understanding of smoking. Addictive Behaviors, 11, 119–123.
  • Engels, R. C. M. E., Knibbe, R. A., De Vries, H., Drop, M. J., & de Haan Y. T. (1997). Homogeneity of cigarette smoking within peer groups: Influence or selection? Health Education & Behavior, 24, 801–811.
  • Ennett, S. T., & Bauman, K. E. (1994). The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity: The case of adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 653–663.
  • Ezzati, M., & Lopez, A. D. (2000). Estimates of global mortality attributable to smoking in 2000. Lancet, 362, 847–852.
  • Fang, X., Li, X., Stanton, B., & Dong, Q. (2003). Social network positions and smoking experimentation among Chinese adolescents. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27, 257–267.
  • Farmer, T. W., & Rodkin, P. C. (1996). Antisocial and prosocial correlates of classroom social positions: The social network centrality perspective. Social Development, 5, 174–188.
  • Fisher, L. A., & Bauman, K. E. (1988). Influence and selection in the friend-adolescent relationship: Findings from studies of adolescent smoking and drinking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 289–314.
  • Flay, B. R., Hu, F. B., & Richardson, J. (1998). Psychosocial predictors of different stages of cigarette smoking among high school students. Preventive Medicine, 27, A9–A18.
  • Flay, B. R., Hu, F. B., Siddiqui, O., Day, L. E., Hedecker, D., Petraitis, J., (1994). Differential influence of parental smoking and friends’ smoking on adolescent initiation and escalation of smoking. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 248–265.
  • Friedman, L. S., Lichtenstein, E., & Biglan, A. (1985). Smoking onset among teens: An empirical analysis of initial situations. Journal of Adolescent Health, 10, 1–13.
  • Gervais, A., O'Loughlin, J., Meshefedjian, G., Bancej, C., & Tremblay, M. (2006). Milestones in the natural course of onset of cigarette use among adolescents. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 175, 255–261.
  • Gest, S. D., Graham-Bermann, S. A., & Hartup, W. W. (2001). Peer experience: Common and unique features of number of friendships, social network centrality, and sociometric status. Social Development, 10, 23–40.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Anchor/Doubleday.
  • Goswick, I. R. A., & Jones, W. H. (1982). Components of loneliness during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 11, 373–383.
  • Hall-Lande, J. A., Eisenberg, M. E., Christenson, S. L., & Neumark-Sztanier, D. (2007). Social isolation, psychological health, and protective factors in adolescence. Adolescence, 42, 265–286.
  • Hartup, W. W. (1989). Social relationships and their developmental significance. American Psychologist, 44, 120–126.
  • Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
  • Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effect models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486–504.
  • Henry, D. B. (1996). FNET: A computer program for social network analysis of peer nomination data (Technical report). Chicago, IL: Institute for Juvenile Research, University of Illinois at Chicago.
  • Henry, D. B., & Kobus, K. (2007). Early adolescent social networks and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 27, 346–362.
  • Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Hwang, M. S., Yeagley, K. L., & Petosa, R. (2004). A meta-analysis of adolescent psychosocial smoking prevention programs published between 1987 and 1997 in the United States. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 702–719.
  • Ikard, F. F., Green, P. E., & Horn, D. (1969). A scale to differentiate between types of smoking as related to the management of affect. International Journal of the Addictions, 4, 649–659.
  • Kassel, J. D., Stroud, L. R., & Paronis, C. A. (2003). Smoking, stress, and negative affect: Correlation, causation, and context across stages of smoking. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 270–304.
  • Kim, S., & Shanahan, J. (2003). Stigmatizing smokers: Public sentiment toward cigarette smoking and its relationship to smoking behaviors. Journal of Health Communication, 8, 343–367.
  • Kobus, K., & Henry, D. B. (2010). Interplay of network position and peer substance use in early adolescent cigarette, alcohol and marijuana use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 225–245.
  • Lovell, A. M. (2002). Risking risk: The influence of types of capital and social networks on the injection practices of drug users. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 803–821.
  • Marcoen, A., Goossens, L., & Caes, P. (1987). Loneliness in pre- through late adolescence: Exploring the contributions of a multidimensional approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 561–577.
  • Mercken, L., Snijder, T. A. B., Steglich, C., & de Vries, H. (2009). Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior: Social network analyses in six European countries. Social Science & Medicine, 69, 1506–1514.
  • Mercken, L., Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C., Vertiainen, E., & de Vries, H. (2010). Smoking-based selection and influence in gender-segregated friendship networks: A social network analysis of adolescent smoking. Addition, 105, 1280–1289.
  • Metsch, L. R., McCoy, C. B., McCoy, H. V., Shultz, J., Inciardi, J., Wolfe, H., & Correa, R. (1998). Social influences: Living arrangements of drug using women at risk for HIV infection. Women Health, 27, 123–136.
  • Michell, L. (1997). Loud, sad or bad: Young people's perceptions of peer groups and smoking. Health Education Research, 11, 39–49.
  • Michell, L., & Amos, A. (1997). Girls, pecking order and smoking. Social Science & Medicine, 44, 1861–1869.
  • Moore, D., & Schultz, N. R. (1983). Loneliness at adolescence: Correlates, attributions, and coping. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12, 95–100.
  • Newcomb, M. D., Huba, G. J., & Bentler, P. M. (1981). A multidimensional assessment of stressful life events among adolescents: Derivation and correlates. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22, 400–415.
  • Nichter, M., Nichter, M., Vuckovic, N., Quintero, G., & Ritenbaugh, C. (1997). Smoking experimentation and initiation among adolescent girls: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Tobacco Control, 6, 285–295.
  • Oetting, E. R., & Beauvais, F. (1986). Peer cluster theory: Drugs and the adolescent. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 205–213.
  • Oetting, E. R., Deffenbacher, J. L., & Donnermeyer, J. F. (1998). Primary socialization theory: The role played by personal trait in the etiology of drug use and deviance. Substance Use and Misuse, 33, 1337–1366.
  • Oetting, E. R., & Donnermeyer, J. F. (1998). Primary socialization theory: The etiology of drug use and deviance. Substance Use and Misuse, 33, 995–1026.
  • Pearson, M., & Michell, L. (2000). Smoke rings: Social network analysis of friendship groups, smoking and drug-taking. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 7, 21–37.
  • Pearson, M., Sweeting, H., West, P., Young, R., Gordon, J., & Turner, K. (2006). Adolescent substance use in different social and peer contexts: A social network analysis. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 13, 519–536.
  • Petronio, S. (2000). The boundaries of privacy: Praxis of everyday life. In S. Petronio (Ed.), Balancing the secrets of private disclosures (pp. 37–49). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Rende, R., Slomkowski, C., Lloyd-Richardson, E., & Niaura, R. (2005). Sibling effects on substance use in adolescence: Social and genetic relatedness. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 611–618.
  • Richards, W. D. (1989). The NEGOPY network analysis program. Burnaby, Canada: Department of Communications, Simon Fraser University.
  • Richards, W. D., & Rice, R. E. (1981). The NEGOPY network analysis program. Social Networks, 3, 215–223.
  • Roger, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
  • Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Schaefer, C., Coyne, J. C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981). The health-related functions of social support. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 381–406.
  • Seeman, T. E., & Syme, S. L. (1987). Social networks and coronary artery disease: A comparison of the structure and function of social relations as predictors of disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 49, 341–354.
  • Slomkowski, C., Rende, R., Novak, S., Lloyd-Richardson, E., & Niaura, R. (2005). Sibling effects on smoking in adolescence: Evidence for social influence from a genetically informative design. Addiction, 100, 430–438.
  • Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1974). Criminology (9th ed.). Philadephia, PA: Lippincott.
  • Tani, C. R., Chavez, E. L., & Deffenbacher, J. L. (2001). Peer isolation and drug use among white non-Hispanic and Mexican American adolescents. Adolescence, 36, 127–139.
  • Thoits, P. A. (1995). Stress, coping, and social support processes: Where are we? What next? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Extra Issue, 35, 53–79.
  • Thomas, R. E., & Perera, R. (2006). School-based programmes for preventing smoking. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: CD001293.
  • Tucker, J. S., Martínez, J. F., Ellickson, P. L., & Edelen, M. O. (2008). Temporal associations of cigarette smoking with social influences, academic performance, and delinquency: A four-wave longitudinal study from ages 13–23. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 1–11.
  • Unger, J. B., & Chen, X. (1999). The role of social networks and media receptivity in predicting age of smoking initiation: A proportional hazards model of risk and protective factors. Addictive Behaviors, 24, 371–381.
  • Urberg, K. A., Degirmencioglu, S. M., & Pilgrim, C. (1997). Close friend and group influence on adolescent cigarette smoking and alcohol use. Developmental Psychology, 33, 834–844.
  • Valente, T. W. (1995). Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Valente, T. W., Unger, J. B., & Johnson, A. C. (2005). Do popular students smoke? The association between popularity and smoking middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37, 323–329.
  • Wang, M. Q., Fitzhugh, E. C., Eddy, J. M., Fu, Q., & Turner, L. W. (1997). Social influences on adolescents’ smoking progress: A longitudinal analysis. American Journal of Health Behavior, 21, 111–117.
  • Warren, C. W., Jones, N. R., Eriksen, M. P., & Asma, S. (2006). Patterns of global tobacco use in young people and implications for future chronic disease burden in adults. Lancet, 367, 749–753.
  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wills, T. A., & Cleary, S. D. (1996). How are social support effects mediated: A test for parental support and adolescent substance use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 937–952.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.