Failure and drug use intervention the Behavioral and Attitudinal Modification Project (BAM): A Failed Experiment Using a Classical Experimental Research Design in a Closed Institutional Setting for Drug Addicts

References

• Adams S. Evaluation Research in Corrections: A Practical Guide. U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (NILE/CJ), Washington, D.C. 1975
   Google Scholar
• Bailey R. C. The Experimental Behavioral and Attitudinal Modification Project (BAM). University of Southern California, Public Systems Research Institute, Los Angeles 1971, Final Report to the California Council on Criminal Justice
   Google Scholar
• Bale R. N., Vanston W. W., Kuldow J. M., Englesing T. M. J., Elashoff R. M., Zarcone V. P. Therpaeutic communities vs. methadone maintenance: A prospective controlled study of narcotic addiction treatment. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1980; 37: 179–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk R. A., Smyth G. K., Sherman L. W. When randon assignment fails: Some lessons from the Minneapolis spouse abuse experiment. J. Quant. Criminol. 1988; 4(3)209–223
   Google Scholar
• Camp G. M., Camp C. G. Building on Prior Experiences: Therapeutic Communities in Prisons. Criminal Justice Institute, South Salem, New York 1989
   Google Scholar
• Campbell D. T. Reforms as experiments. Am. Psychol. 1969; 24: 409–429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook T. D., Campbell R. T. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Rand McNally, Chicago 1979
   Google Scholar
• Dennis M. L. Implementing Randomized Field Experiments: An Analysis of Criminal and Civil Justice Research. Doctoral Dissertation, Northwestern University. 1988–1988; 49: 2817, Diss. Abstr. Int.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis M. L. Design, management, and analysis of randomly controlled trials in communitybased settings. Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation., J. S. Wholey, H. Hatry, K. Newcomer. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, in press
   Google Scholar
• Glaser D. Evaluation Research and Decision Guidance: For Correctional, Addiction-Treatment, Mental Health. and Other People-Changing Agencies. Transaction, New Brunswick, New Jersey 1988
   Google Scholar
• Randomized Field Experiments in Criminal Justice Agencies: Workshops Proceedings, R. O. Lempert, C. A. Visher. National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 1987
   Google Scholar
• McGlothlin W. H., Anglin M. D., Wilson B. D. An Evaluation of the California Civil Addict Program. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, Maryland 1977
   Google Scholar
• Palmer T. Correctional Intervention and Research: Current Issues and Future Prospects. Lexington Books, Lexington, Massachusetts 1978
   Google Scholar
• Rezmovic E. L., Cook T. J., Dobson L. D. Beyond random assignment: Factors affecting evaluation integrity. Eval. Rev. 1981; 5(1)51–67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sing G. E. California Civil Addict Program: A One Year Follow-up of All Residents Released from the Ca1ifornia Rehabilitation Center to Outpatient Status in 1969. Civil Addict Program Research Unit, CRC, Corona, California 1971, Research Report 12
   Google Scholar
• Adams S. Evaluation Research in Corrections: A Practical Guide. U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (NILE/CJ), Washington, D.C. 1975
   Google Scholar
• Bale R. N., Vanston W. W., Kuldow J. M., Englesing T. M. J., Elashoff R. M., Zarcone V. P. Therapeutic communities vs. methadone maintenance: A prospective controlled study of narcotic addiction treatment. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1980; 37: 179–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belton P. J. Civil commitment of narcotics addicts in California: A case history of statutory construction. Hasting Law J. 1968; 19: 603–665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk R. A., Smyth G. K., Sherman L. W. When random assignment fails: Some lessons for the Minneapolis spouse abuse experiment. J. Quant. Criminol. 1988; 4(3)209–223
   Google Scholar
• Blumberg A., Golembiewski R. T. Learning and Change in Groups. Penguin Books, Baltimore 1976
   Google Scholar
• Bohart A. C. Role Playing and the Reduction of Interpersonal Conflict. Doctoral Dissertation., University of California, Los Angeles 1972; B3: 435, 31, Diss. Abstr. Int.
   Google Scholar
• Camp G. M., Camp C. G. Building on Prior Experiences: Therapeutic Communities in Prisons. Criminal Justice Institute, South Salem, New York 1989
   Google Scholar
• Campbell D. T. Reforms as experiments. Am. Psychol. 1969; 24: 409–429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark R. Crime in America: Observations on Its Nature, Causes, Prevention and Control. Simon and Schuster, New York 1970
   Google Scholar
• Cook T. D., Campbell R. T. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Rand McNally, Chicago 1979
   Google Scholar
• Corsini R. J., Shaw M. E., Blake R. R. Role Playing in Business and Industry. Free Press of Glencoe, New York 1961
   Google Scholar
• Cressey D. R. Limitations on organization of treatment in the modem prison. Theoretical Studies in Social Organization of the Prison, R. A. Cloward, et al. Science Research Council, New York 1960
   Google Scholar
• Crowther C. Crimes, penalties, and legislatures. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 1969; 381: 147–158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker P. J., Nathan B. R. Behavior Modeling Training: Principles and Applications. Praeger, New York 1985
   Google Scholar
• Dennis M. L. Implementing Randomized Field Experiments: An Analysis of Criminal and Civil Justice Research. Doctoral Dissertation, Northwestern University. Diss. Abstr. Int. 1988; 49: 2817
   Google Scholar
• Egan G. Encounter: Group Processes for Interpersonal Growth. Brook/Cole Publishing Co, Belmont, California 1970
   Google Scholar
• Falco M. The Making of a Drug-Free America. Random House, New York 1992
   Google Scholar
• Fisher S. Therapeutic community in a correctional establishment. Br. J. Criminol. 1968; 8(3)275–284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankiel H. H. The Process of Change in Sensitivity Training. 1968, Unpublished, UCLA
   Google Scholar
• Gibb J. R. Climate for trust. T-Group Theory and the Laboratory Method, L. P. Bradford, J. R. Gibb, K. D. Benne. Wiley, New York 1964
   Google Scholar
• Glaser D. The Effectiveness of a Prison and Parole System. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, Indiana 1964
   Google Scholar
• Glaser D. Evaluation Research and Decision Guidance: For Correctional, Addiction-Treatment, Mental Health, and Other People-Changing Agencies. Transaction, New Brunswick, New Jersey 1988
   Google Scholar
• Golembiewski R. T. Approaches to Planned Change. Dekker, New York 1979
   Google Scholar
• Hare A. P. Social Interaction as Drama: Applications from Conflict Management. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California 1985
   Google Scholar
• Hser Y. I., Anglin M. D., Powers K. A 24-year follow-up of California narcotics addicts. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1993; 50: 577–584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korn R. A., McCorkle L. Criminology and Penology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York 1959
   Google Scholar
• Randomized Field Experiments in Criminal Justice Agencies: Workshop Proceedings, R. O. Lempert, C. A. Visher. National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 1987
   Google Scholar
• Lifton W. H. Groups: Facilitating Individual Growth and Societal Change. Wiley, New York 1972
   Google Scholar
• McGlothlin W. H., Anglin M. D., Wilson B. D. An Evaluation of the California Civil Addict Program. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, Maryland 1977
   Google Scholar
• National Conference on Penitentiary and Reformatory Discipline at Cincinnati. As Revised and Reaffirmed in the Proceedings of the 60th Annual Congress of the American Prison Association. Louisville, Kentucky 1871; 249, 1930
   Google Scholar
• Palmer T. Correctional Intervention and Research: Current Issues and Future Prospects. Lexington Books, Lexington, Massachusetts 1978
   Google Scholar
• Pinkerton T. Breaking Communication Barriers with Roleplay. John Knox Press, AtlantaGeorgia 1976
   Google Scholar
• Rezmovic E. L., Cook T. J., Dobson L. D. Beyond random assignment: Factors affecting evaluation integrity. Eval. Rev. 1981; 5(1)51–67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers C. R. On Encounter Groups. Harper and Row, New York 1970
   Google Scholar
• Sarason I. G., Ganzer V. J. Modeling and group discussion in the rehabilitation of juvenile delinquents. J. Couns. Psychol. 1973; 20: 442–449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiber S. Fatal Remedies. Plenum Press, New York 1981
   Google Scholar
• Shaftel F. R., Shaftel G. Building Intelligent Concern for Others through Role-Playing. National Conference of Christians and Jews, New York 1967
   Google Scholar
• Sing G. E. California Civil Addict Program: A One Year Follow-up of All Residents Released from the California Rehabilitation Center to Outpatient Status in 1969. Civil Addict Program Research Unit, CRC, Corona, California 1971, Research Report 12
   Google Scholar
• Sundel M., et al. Individual Change through Small Groups. Free Press, New York 1985
   Google Scholar
• Tuan Y. F. Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 1974
   Google Scholar
• Wines F. H. Punishment and Reformation. Crowell, New York 1895
   Google Scholar