A Framework for the Evaluation of Activities and Programs with Harm-Reduction Objectives

References

• American Evaluation Association. Guiding principles for evaluators. New Directions in Program Evaluation, No. 66, W R Shadish, D L Newman, M A Scheirer, C Wye. Jossey-Bass, pp. 19–26, San Francisco, CA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Azjen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1980
   Google Scholar
• Ball J C, Van De Wijngaart G F. A Dutch addict's view of methadone maintenance: An American and a Dutch appraisal. Addiction 1994; 89((7))79–02
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Becker H M. The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Educ. Monogr. 1974; 2: 324–508
   Google Scholar
• Botelho R J, Richmond R. Secondary prevention of excessive alcohol use: Assessing the prospects of implementation. Fam. Prac. Res. 1995; 13(2)182–193
   Google Scholar
• Buning E C, Van Brussel G H. A, Van Santen G. The “methadone by bus” project in Amsterd. Am. Br. J. Addict. 1990; 85(10)1247–1250
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caulkins J. Enforcement or Treatment. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on the Reduction of Drug-Related Harm, Toronto, March, 6–101994
   Google Scholar
• Chen H.-T, Rossi P H. Issues in the theorydriven perspective. Eval. Program Plann. 1989; 12: 299–306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung Y W. Review/commentary of “The reduction of Drug-related Harm” (O'Hare et al., 1992) and “Psychoactive drugs and harm reduction: From faith to science” (Heather et al., 1993). Contemp. Drug Probl. 1994; 21: 341–349
   Google Scholar
• Dear L. Negotiated safety: What you don't know won't hurt you, or will it?. Drug Alcohol Rev. 1995; 14((Special Issue Harm Reduction)(3))323–329
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• French M T, Bradley C J, Calingaert B, Dennis M L. Cost analysis of training and employment services in methadone treatment. Eval. Program Plann. 1994; 17(2)107–120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grund J P. Peer-Driven Health Promotion to Combat HIV among Injection Drug Users: Project Description and Preliminary Results. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on the Reduction of Drug-Related Harm, Toronto, March, 6–101994
   Google Scholar
• Guba E G, Lincoln Y S. Effective Evaluation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 1981
   Google Scholar
• Hawks D. Impediments to the global adoption of harm-reduction policies. Psychoactive Drugs and Harm Reduction: From Faith to Science, N Heather, A Wodak, N Nadelmann, P O'Hare. Whurr Publishers, London 1993; pp. 93–102
   Google Scholar
• Hawks D, Lenton S. Harm reduction in Australia: Has it worked? A review. Drug Alcohol Rev 1995; 14((3)(Special Issue: Harm Reduction))291–304
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heather N. Groundwork for a research programme on harm reduction in alcohol and drug treatment. Drug Alcohol Rev. 1995; 14((3)(Special Issue: Harm Reduction))331–336
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levin H M. Cost-effectiveness analysis in evaluation research. Handbook of Evaluation Research, Vol. 2, M Guttentag, E L Struening. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA 1975; pp. 89–124
   Google Scholar
• Major C. The NSW “Speedwise-Speedsafe” campaign. Connection 1994; 13: 14–16
   Google Scholar
• McDermott P, Matthews A, O'Hare P, Bennett A. Ecstasy in the United Kingdom: Recreational drug use and subcultural change. Psychoactive Drugs and Harm Reduction: From Faith to Science, N Heather, A Wodak, E Nadelmann, P O'Hare. Whurr Publishers, London 1993; 230–246
   Google Scholar
• Moore L D, Wenger L D. The Social context of needle exchange and user self-organization in San Francisco: Possibilities and pitfalls. J. Drug Issues 1995; 25(3)583–598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcomb R. The reduction of drug-related harm: A conceptual framework for theory, practice and research. The Reduction of Drug-Related Harm, P O'Hare, R Newcomb, A Matthews, E.C Buning. Routledge, London 1992
   Google Scholar
• Ogborne A C, Rush B R. Program logic models: Tools for program planning and evaluation. Strategic Management, Program Evaluation and Accountability for Health Service Professionals, J Lloyd-Jones, F Simyar. CHA Press, Ottawa 1994; 61–72
   Google Scholar
• Patton M Q. Utilization-Focused Evaluation, 2nd ed. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA 1997
   Google Scholar
• Plomp H N, Van Der Hek H, Ader J H. The Amsterdam Methadone Dispensing Circuit: Genesis and effectiveness of a public health model for local drug policy. Addiction 1996; 91(5)711–721
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prochaska J, Dclementi C. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking toward an integrative model of change. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1983; 51: 390–395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley D. The Harm-Reduction Model: Pragmatic Approaches to Drug Use from the Area between Intolerance and Neglect. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, Ottawa 1994
   Google Scholar
• Rothenberg J. Cost-benefit analysis: A methodological exposition. Handbook of Evaluation Research. Vol. 2, M Guttentag, E L Struening. Sage, pp. 55–88, Beverly Hills, CA 1975
   Google Scholar
• Rush B, Ogborne A C. Program logic models: Expanding their role and structure for program planning and evaluation. Can. J. Program Eval. 1991; 6(2)93–105
   Google Scholar
• Russell M. Reduction of smoking-related ham: The score for nicotine replacement. Psychoactive Drugs and Harm Reduction: From Faith to Science, N Heather, A Wodak, E Nadelmann, P O'Hare. Whurr Publishers, pp. 153–167, London 1993
   Google Scholar
• Rutman L. Planning Useful Evaluations: Evaluability Assessment. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA 1980; 208 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Rychtarik R, Foy D W, Scott T, Lokey L. Five-six year follow-up of broad-spectrum behavioural treatment for alcoholism: Effects of training in controlled drinking skills. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1987; 55: 106–108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samarasinghe D. Harm reduction in the developing world. Drug Alcohol Rev. 1995; 14((3)(Special Issue: Harm Reduction))301–309
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Craig M. Random assignment to abstinence or controlled drinking in a cognitive-behavioural program: Short term effects on drinking behaviour. Addict. Behav. 1980; 5: 35–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Single E. Defining harm reduction. Drug Alcohol Rev. 1995; 14((3)(Special Issue: Harm Reduction))287–290
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smart R G. The effects of alcohol control policies. Northern Spirits: A Social History of Alcohol in Canada, 2nd ed., R G Smart, A C Ogborne. Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto 1996; pp. 153–170
   Google Scholar
• Stake R E. Evaluating the Arts in Education. Merrill, Columbus, OH 1975
   Google Scholar
• Stimson G V. Has the United Kingdom averted an epidemic of HIV-1 infection among drug injectors. Addiction 1996; 91: 1085–1088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang J. Drug use and harm reduction: Responding to the challenge. Psychoactive Drugs and Harm Reduction: From Faith to Science, N Heather, A Wodak, E Nadelmann, P O'Hare. Whurr Publishers, London 1993; pp. 3–20
   Google Scholar
• Toepell A R. Harm reduction efforts inside Canadian prisons: The example of education. Harm Reduction; A New Direction for Drug Policies and Programs, P A Erickson, D M Riley, Y W Cheung, PA O'Hare. University of Toronto Press, Toronto 1997
   Google Scholar
• Ward J, Mattick R P, Hall W. The effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment: An overview. Drug Alcohol Rev. 1994; 13(3)327–336
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinstein N D. The precaution adoption hypothesis. Health Psychol. 1988; 12: 235–245
   Google Scholar
• Weiss C H. Where politics and evaluation research meet. The Politics of Program Evaluation, D S Palumbo. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA 1987; 47–70
   Google Scholar