Compulsory Substance-User Treatment and Harm Reduction: A Critical Analysis

References

• Alexander B K, Lewis C, Van Wijngaarden J, Van De Wijngaart G F. Dubious consensus: Support for anti-drug policy among Dutch and Canadian university students. J. Drug Issues 1992; 22: 903–922
   Google Scholar
• Alexander B K, Van De Wijngaart G F. An obstacle to harm reduction: Support for the “temperance mentality” among university students in six countries. New Policies and Programs for the Reduction of Drug Related Harm, P Erickson, D Riley, P Cheung, P O'Hare. University of Toronto Press, Toronto 1997
   Google Scholar
• Anglin M D. The efficacy of civil commitment in treating narcotic addiction. Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice, C G Leukefeld, F G Tims. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD 1988
   Google Scholar
• Anglin M D, Brecht M, Maddahian E. Pretreatment characteristics and treatment performance of legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance admissions. Criminology 1989; 27: 537–557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anglin M D, Hser Y. Legal coercion and drug abuse treatment: Research findings and Social policy implications. Handbook of Drug Control in the United States, J Lnciardi. Greenwood Press, Westport, CT 1990
   Google Scholar
• Anglm M D, Hser Y. Criminal justice and the drug-abusing offender: Policy issues of coerced treatment. Behav. Sci. Law 1991; 9: 243–267
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atkins R D. The role of defense counsel in the diversion process. Developments in the Field of Drug Abuse, E Senay, V Shorty, H Alksure. Schenkman Publishing, Cambridge, MA 1974
   Google Scholar
• Ball J C, Shaffer J W, Nurco D N. The day-to-day criminality of heroin addicts in Baltimore: A study in the continuity of offense rates. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1983; 12: 119–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumohl J, Room R. Inebriety, doctors, and the state: Alcohol treatment institutions before 1940. Recent Developments in Alcoholism, M Galanter. Plenum, New York, NY 1987
   Google Scholar
• Belenko S, Fagan J A, Dumanovsky T. The effects of legal sanctions on recidivism in special drug courts. Justice Syst. J. 1994; 17: 53–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd N, Millard C J, Webster C D. Heroin “treatment” in British Columbia, 1976–1984: Thesis, antithesis, and synthesis?. Illicit Drugs in Canada: A Risky Business, J C Blackwell, P G Erickson. Nelson Press, Scarborough, ON 1988
   Google Scholar
• Brehm S S, McAlister D A. A Social-psychological perspective on the maintenance of therapeutic change. Improving the Long-Term Effects of Psychotherapy, P Karoly, J Steffen. Gardner Press, New York, NY 1980
   Google Scholar
• Bretherton G. Irish inebriate reformatories, 1899–1920: A small experiment in coercion. Contemp. Drug Probl. 1986; 13: 473–502
   Google Scholar
• Brown B S, Buhfunger G, Kaplan CD, Platt JJ. German/American report on the effective use of pressure in the treatment of drug addiction. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 1987; 1: 38–54
   Google Scholar
• Caulkins J P, Reuter P. Setting goals for drug policy: Harm reduction or use reduction?. Addiction 1997; 92: 1143–1150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunham R G, Janik S W. Adoption of the Uniform Alcoholism Treatment Act and the availability of alcoholism treatment programs: A state by state examination. Int. J. Addict. 1985; 20: 503–518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham M. Implications of need-for-treatment laws: A study of Washington state's involuntary treatment act. Hosp. Community Psychiatry 1985; 36: 975–977
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Efuckson P G. Harm reduction: What it is and is not. Drug Alcohol Rev. 1995; 14: 283–285
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erickson P G, Cohen J, Allen B. Alcohol and Other Drugs in the Criminal Justice System (Internal Document 123). Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto 1996
   Google Scholar
• Finn P. Decriminalization of public drunkenness: Response of the health care system. J. Stud. Alcohol 1985; 47: 122–134
   Google Scholar
• Furnham A. Lay Theories: Everyday Understanding of Problems in the Social Sciences. Oxford Pergamon Press. 1988
   Google Scholar
• Gerstein D R, Harwood H J. Treating Drug Problems (Vol. I): A Study of Effectiveness and Financing of Public and Private Drug Treatment Systems. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1990
   Google Scholar
• Swift action for justice system urged to avoid financial crisis. Globe And Mail December 12, 1995
   Google Scholar
• Gostin L O. Compulsory treatment for drug-dependent persons: Justifications for a public health approach to drug dependency. Millbank Q. 1991; 69: 561–593
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenwood P W. Strategies for improving coordination between enforcement and treatment efforts in controlling illegal drug use. J. Drug Issues 1995; 25: 73–89
   Google Scholar
• Hall W. The Role of Legal Coercion in the Treatment of Offenders with Alcohol and Heroin Problems. Paper presented at the Second Annual Symposium of Corrections Health Service on “Drug related crime”, SydneyAustralia, September, 1995
   Google Scholar
• Harrison R, Berezm A. Perspective on jail screening and court referral. Development in the Field of Drug Abuse, E Senay, V Shorty, H Alksure. Schenkman Publishing, Cambridge, MA 1974
   Google Scholar
• Hasin D. Treatment/self-help for alcohol-related problems: Relationship to Social pressure and alcohol dependence. J. Stud. Alcohol 1994; 55: 660–666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilda YV. Civil committment: A review of the empirical research. Behav. Sci. Law 1988; 6: 15–43
   Google Scholar
• Holley H L, Kulczycki G, Arboleda-Florez J. Case-mix funding and legislated psychiatric care. Int. J. Law Psychiatry 1994; 17: 377–393
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Inciardi J A. Compulsory treatment in New York: A brief narrative history of misjudgement, mismanagement, and misrepresentation. J. Drug Issues 1988; 18: 547–560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson V E. Intervention: How to Help Someone Who Doesn't Want Help. Johnson Institute Press, Minneapolis, MN 1986
   Google Scholar
• Kay D C. Civil committment in the federal medical program for opiate addicts. Yearbook of Drug Abuse, L Brill, E Harms. Behavioral Publications, New York, NY 1974
   Google Scholar
• Kolavara D. Compulsory treatment for chronic alcoholics. Sov. Rev. 1961; 2: 23–39
   Google Scholar
• Lehto J. Involuntary treatment of people with substance related problems in the Nordic countries. Misuse and compulsory treatment, M Jarvinen, A Skretting. Nad-Publikation. Helsingfors, Helsingfors 1994
   Google Scholar
• Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice, CG Leukefeld, F G Tims. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD 1988
   Google Scholar
• Linblad R. Civil committment under the federal narcotics addict rehabilitation act. J. Drug Issues 1988; 18: 595–624
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marlatt G A, Baer J S, Donovan D M, Kivlahan D R. Addictive behaviors: Etiology and treatment. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1988; 39: 223–252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlothlin W H, Anglin M D, Wilson B D. Narcotic addiction and crime. Criminology 1978; 16: 193–315
   Google Scholar
• Miller W R. Motivation for treatment: A review with special emphasis on alcoholism. Psychol. Bull. 1985; 98: 84–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadelmann E A. Drug prohibition in the United States: Costs, consequences, and alternatives. Science 1989; 245: 939–946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman R G. Involuntary treatment of drug addiction. Addiction, P S Bourne. Academic Press, New York, NY 1974
   Google Scholar
• Nichols J I. Treatment versus deterrence. Alcohol Health Res. World 1990; 14: 44–51
   Google Scholar
• Nir Y, Cutler R. The unmotivated patient syndrome: A survey of therapeutic interventions. Am. J. Psychiatry 1978; 135: 442–447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogborne A, Wild T C, Braun K, Newton-Taylor B. Beliefs about treatment among staff of specialized addiction treatment services in Ontario. J. Substance Abuse Treat, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Paredes A. Denial, deceptive maneuvers, and consistency in the behavior of alcoholics. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1974; 233: 23–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Platt J J, Buhringer G, Kaplan C D, Brown B S, Taube D O. The prospects and limitations of compulsory treatment for drug addiction. J. Drug Issues 1988; 18: 505–525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter L, Arifr A E, Curran W J. The Law and the Treatment of Drug and Alcohol Dependent Persons: A Comparative Study of Existing Legislation. WHO, Geneva 1986
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal M P. The constitutionality of involuntary civil committment of opiate addicts. J Drug Issues 1988; 18: 641–661
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rotgers F. Coercion in addictions treatment. Annu. Rev. Addict. Res. Treat 1992; 2: 40–16
   Google Scholar
• Salia S. Coercion as a Factor in the Successful Treatment of Alcoholism. The State Alcohol Monopoly, Helsinki 1984
   Google Scholar
• Schottenfeld R. Involuntary treatment of substance abuse disorders: Impediments to success. Psychiatry 1989; 52: 164–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Single E. Defining harm reduction. Drug Alcohol Rev. 1995; 14: 287–290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith R. Addiction, coercion, and treatment: Reflection on the debate. Developments in the Field of Drug Abuse, E Senay, V Shorty, H Alksure. Schenkman Publishing, Cambridge, MA 1974
   Google Scholar
• Sowers W E, Daley D C. Compulsory treatment of substance use disorders. Crim. Behav. Ment. Health 1993; 3: 403–415
   Google Scholar
• Strang J. Drug use and harm reduction: Responding to the challenge. Psychoactive Drugs and Harm Reduction: From Faith to Science, N Heather, A Wodak, E Nadelmann, P O'Hare. Whurr, London 1993
   Google Scholar
• Ward D A. The use of legal coercion in the treatment of alcoholism: A methodological review. J. Drug Issues 1979; 9: 387–398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster C D. Compulsory treatment of narcotic addiction. Int. J. Law Psychiatry 1986; 8: 135–159
   Google Scholar
• Weisner C. Coercion in alcohol treatment. In Institute of Medicine (Ed.). Broadening the Base of Treatment for Alcohol Problems. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1990
   Google Scholar
• Wells-Parker E. Mandated treatment: Lessons from research with drinking and driving offenders. Alcohol Health Res. World 1995; 18: 302–306
   Google Scholar
• Wells-Parker E, Bangert-Drowns R, McMillen R, Williams M. Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drinvdrive offenders. Addiction 1995; 90: 907–926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells-Parker E, Cosby P J. Behavioral and employment consequences of driver's license suspension for drinking-driving offenders. J. Saf Res. 1988; 19: 5–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild T C, Cohen J, Mann R E, Ellis K. Mandated and Coerced Treatment for Substance Abuse: Current Knowledge and Future Research Directions. Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto 1995
   Google Scholar
• Wild T C, Newton-Taylor B, Alletto R. Perceived coercion among clients entering substance abuse treatment: Structural and psychological determinants. Addict. Behav. 1998; 23: 81–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild T C, Newton-Taylor B, Ogborne A. Attitudes toward Coerced Substance Abuse Treatment: A comparison of treatment provider, public, judges, and young offenders views. under review, Manuscript 1998
   Google Scholar
• Williams B, Chang K, Truong M V. Canadian Profile: Alcohol and Other Drugs, 1992. Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto 1992
   Google Scholar
• Zinberg N E. Drug, Set. and Setting: The Basis for Controlled Intoxicant Use. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT 1984
   Google Scholar