Characteristics of Inconsistent Respondents who have “Ever Used” Drugs in a School-Based Sample

References

• Bachman J G, O'Malley P M. When four months equal a year: Inconsistencies in student reports of drug use. Public Opin. Q. 1981; 45: 536–548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey S L, Flewelling R L, Rachal J V. The characteristics of inconsistencies in self-reports of alcohol and marijuana use in a longitudinal study of adolescents. J. Stud. Alcohol 1992; 53: 636–647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson P, Donahue M. Ten-year trends in at-risk behavior: A national study of African-Americans adolescents. J. Adolesc. Res. 1989; 4: 125–139
   Google Scholar
• Bock R D. Measurement of human variation: A two stage model. Multilevel Analysis of Educational Data, R D Bock. Academic Press, New York, NY 1989
   Google Scholar
• Brook J S. Interactional theory: Its utility in explaining drug use behavior among African-American and Puerto Rican youth. Drug abuse among minority youth. Methodological Issues and Recent Research Advances, MR De La Rosa, JL Recio Adrados. (NIDA Research Monograph 130), National Institute of Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD 1993
   Google Scholar
• Bryk A S, Raudenbush. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Models. Sage, Newbury Park, CA 1982
   Google Scholar
• Casti J L. Complexification: Explaining a Paradoxical World through the Science of Surprise. Harper Collins, New York, NY 1994
   Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Kararck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 1983; 24: 385–396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins L M, Sussman S, Rauch J M, Dent C W, Johnson C A, Hansen W B, Flay B R. Psychosocial predictors of young adolescent cigarette smoking: A sixteen month, three wave longitudinal study. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1987; 17: 554–573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster A P, Rubin D B, Tsutakawa R K. Estimation in covariance components models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1981; 76: 341–353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot D S, Huizinga D, Ageton S S. Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA 1985
   Google Scholar
• Fendrich M, Vaughn C M. Diminished lifetime substance use over time. Public Opin. Q. 1994; 58: 96–123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flay B R, Brannon B R, Johnson C A, Hansen W B, Ulene A L, Whitney-Saltiel D A, Gleason L R, Sussman S, Gavin M D, Glowacz K M, Sobol D F, Spiegal D C. The television, school and family smoking cessation and prevention project: I. Theoretical basis and program development. Prev. Med. 1988; 17: 585–607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flay B R, Miller T Q, Hedeker D, Siddiqui O, Britton C F, Brannon B R, Johnson C A, Hansen W B, Sussman S, Dent C. The television, school and family smoking prevention and cessation project: VIII. Student outcomes and mediating variables. Prev. Med. 1995; 24: 29–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore M, Novotny T, Pierce J, Hatzianreu E, Patel K, Davis R. Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States: The changing influence of gender and race. JAMA 1990; 261: 49–55
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons R D, Eaternaux C, Hedeker D, Davis J M. Random regression models: A comprehensive approach to the analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data. Psychopharmacol. Bull. 1988; 27: 73–77
   Google Scholar
• Harrison L, Hughes A. The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates. (NIDA Research Monograph 167), National Institute of Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD 1997
   Google Scholar
• Hedeker D. Mixor: A Fortran Program for Mixed-Effects Ordinal Probit and Logistic Regression. Technical Report. Prevention Research Center, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 1993
   Google Scholar
• Hedeker D, Gibbons R D. A random-effects ordinal regression model for multilevel analysis. Biometrics 1994; 50: 933–944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennrich R I, Schlucher M D. Unbalanced repeated-measures models with structured covariance matrices. Biometrics 1986; 42: 805–820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laird N M, Ware J H. Random effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 1982; 38: 963–974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longford N T. A fast scoring algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation in unbalanced mixed models with nested random effects. Biometrika 1987; 74: 817–827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz E N. The Essence of Chaos. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA 1993
   Google Scholar
• Luetgert M L, Armstrong A H. Methodological issues in drug usage surveys: Anonymity, recency, and frequency. Int. J. Addict. 1973; 8: 683–689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magura S, Kang S. The validity of self-reported cocaine use in two high risk populations. The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates, L Harrison, A Hughes. (NIDA Research Monograph 167, pp. 227–246), National Institute of Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD 1997
   Google Scholar
• Martin G L, Newman I M. Assessing the validity of self-reported adolescent cigarette smoking. J. Drug Educ. 1988; 18: 275–284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mensch B S, Kandel D B. Underreporting of substance use in a national longitudinal youth cohort: Individual and interviewer effects. Public Opin. Q. 1988; 52: 100–124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needle R H, Jou S, Su S S. The impact of changing methods of data collection on the reliability of self-reported drug use of adolescents. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 1989; 15: 275–289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needle R H, McCubbin H, Lorence J, Hochhauser M. Reliability and validity of adolescent self-reported drug use in a family-based study: A methodological report. Int. J. Addict. 1983; 18: 901–912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Malley P M, Bachman J G, Johnston L D. Reliability and consistency in self-reports of drug use. Int. J. Addict. 1983; 18: 805–824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen W. Reliability of drug use responses in a longitudinal study. Scand. J. Psychol. 1990; 31: 28–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulkkinen L. Youthful smoking and drinking in a longitudinal perspective. J. Youth Adolesc. 1993; 12: 253–283
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqui O, Flay B R, Hu FB. Factors affecting attrition in a longitudinal smoking prevention study. Prev. Med. 1996; 25: 554–560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon T R, Sussman S, Dent C W, Stacy A W. Predictors of misreporting cigarette smoking initiation among adolescents. Eval. Rev. 1996; 20(5)552–568
   Google Scholar
• Single E, Kandel D, Johnson B. The reliability and validity of drug use responses in a large scale longitudinal survey. J. Drug Issues 1975; 5: 426–443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobol D F, Rohrbach L A, Dent C W, Gleason L, Brannon B R, Johnson C A, Flay B R. The integrity of a smoking prevention curriculum delivery. Health Educ. Res. 1989; 4: 59–67
   Google Scholar
• Sussman S, Dent C W, Stacy A W, Buciaga C, Raynor A, Turner G E, Charlin V, Craig S, Hansen W B, Burton D, Flay B R. Peer group association and adolescent tobacco use. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 1990; 99: 349–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department OF Health And Human Services (1994 Preventing Tobacco Use among Young People. A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health
   Google Scholar
• Windle M A. Longitudinal study of antisocial behaviors in early adolescence as predictors of late adolescent substance use: Gender and ethnic group differences. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 1990; 99: 86–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar