Measurements, Instruments, Scales, and Tests: The Helping Alliance Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties in Patients with Substance Dependence

References

• Alexander L. B., Coffey D. S. Understanding the therapeutic relationship. Curr. Opinion Psychiatry 1997; 10: 233–238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander L. B., Luborsky L. The Penn Helping Alliance Scales. The Psychotherapeutic Process: A Research Handbook, L. S. Greenberg, W. M. Pinsof. Guilford Press, New York, NY 1984
   Google Scholar
• Alexander L. B., Luborsky L. Research on the helping alliance. The Psychotherapeutic Process, L. S. Greenberg, W. M. Pinsof. Guilford Press, New York, NY 1986
   Google Scholar
• Barrett-Lennard G. I. Dimensions of Therapist Response as Causal Factors in Therapeutic Change. 1962, (Psychological Monographs 76, No. 43).
   Google Scholar
• Bell D. C., Atkinson J. S., Williams M. L., Nelson R., Spence R. T. The trajectory of client progress: A longitudinal pilot study. J. Substance Abuse Treat. 1996; 13(3)211–218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelens W. Cognitive therapy in depression. Dir. Ther. 1986; 6: 17–35, [Cognitieve therapie bij depressie]
   Google Scholar
• Bohn M. J., Barton B. A., Barron K. E. Psychometric properties and validity of the obsessivexompulsive drinking scale. Alcoholism: Clin. Exp. Res. 1996; 20(5)817–823
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Jong C. A. J. Who Benefits? A Study into the Prognostic Validity of a Multidimensional Clinical Diagnostic Instrument among Treated Alcohol Addicts. 1993, [Wie wordt er beter van?]
   Google Scholar
• Thesis Nijmegen, Gerstley L., McLellan A. T., Alterman A. I., Woody G. E., Luborsky L., Prout M. Ability to form an alliance with the therapist: A possible marker of prognosis for patients with anitsocial personality disorder. Am. J. Psychiatry 1989; 146: 508–512
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gottheil E., McLellan A. T., Druley K. A. Length of stay, patient severity and treatment outcome: Sample data from the field of alcoholism. J. Stud. Alcohol 1992; 53(1)69–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenson R. The working alliance and the transference neurosis. Psychoanal. Q. 1965; 34: 155–181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatcher R. L., Barends A. W. Patients' view of the alliance in psychotherapy: Exploratory factor analysis of three alliance measures. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1996; 64: 1326–1336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks V. M., Kaplan C. D., Van Limbeek J., Geerlings P. J. The Addiction Severity Index: Reliability and validity in a Dutch addict population. J. Substance Abuse Treat. 1989; 6: 133–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath A. O., Symonds B. D. Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1991; 38: 139–149
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog K. G., Sorbom D. LISREL 8. Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Scientific Software Inc, Chicago IL 1993
   Google Scholar
• Levine S. W., Herron W. G. Changes during the course of the psychotherapeutic relationship. Psychol. Rep. 1990; 66: 883–897
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lietaer G. Dutch revision of Barrett-Lennards' Relationship Inventory for individual psychotherapeutic relationships. Psychol. Belg. 1976; 16: 73–94, [Nederlandse revisie van Barrett-Lennard's Relationship Inventory voor individueel therapeutische relaties]
   Google Scholar
• Luborsky L. Helping alliance in psychotherapy: The groundwork for a study of their relationship to its outcome. Successful Psychotherapy, J. L. Claghorn. Brunner/Mazel, New York, NY 1976
   Google Scholar
• Luborsky L., Barber J. P., Siqueland L., Johnson S., et al. The Revised Helping Alliance Questionnaire (Haq-II): Psychometric properties. J. Psychorher. Prac. Res. 1996; 5: 260–271
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luborsky L., McLellan A. T., Woody G. E., O'Brien G. P., Auerbach A. Therapist success and its determinants. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1985; 42: 602–611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marziali E., Alexander L. The power of the therapeutic relationship. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 1991; 61: 383–391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marziali E., Marmar C., Krupnick J. Therapeutic Alliance Scales: Development and relationship to psychotherapy outcome. Am. J. Psychiary 1981; 38: 361–364
   Google Scholar
• McLellan A. T., Luborsky L., Cacciola J., Griffith J., Evans F., Barr H. L., O'Brien C. P. New data from the Addiction Severity Index: Reliability and validity in three centers. J. Nerv. Merit. Dis. 1985; 173: 412–423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohl P. C., Martinez D., Ticknor C., Huanc M., Cordell L. Early dropouts from psychotherapy. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 1991; 179: 478–481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najavits L. M., Weiss R. D. Variations in therapist effectiveness in the treatment of patients with substance use disorders: An emperical review. Addiction 1994; 89: 679–688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oort-Marburger D., Oort F. J., Schmidt S. H. A three-step procedure for shortening a questionnaire into an efficient measurement instrument. Tijdschr. Soc., Gezondheids. 1995; 13: 528–538
   Google Scholar
• Orlinsky D. E., Howard K. I. Process and outcome in psychotherapy. Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change, S. J. Garfield, A. E. Begin. Wiley, New York NY 1996
   Google Scholar
• Rogers C. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1957; 21: 95–103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zetzel E. Current concepts of transference. Int. J. Psychoanal. 1956; 37: 369–375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar