Formulation development of Carvedilol compression coated tablet

References

• Conte U, Giunchedi P, Maggi L, et al. Ibuprofen delayed release dosage form: a proposal for the preparation of an in vitro/in vivo pulsatile system. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm 1992;38:209–212.
   Google Scholar
• Gunsel W, Dusel R. Compression Coated and layer tablets. In Liberman, HA, Lachman L, Schwartz JB, eds. Pharmaceutical Dosage forms: Tablets. 2nd ed., Marcel Dekker, INC, New York, 1989: 247–284.
   Google Scholar
• Shiyani B, Gattani S, Surana S. Formulation and evaluation of bi-layer tablet of metoclopramide hydrochloride and ibuprofen. AAPS PharmSciTech 2008;9:818–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sockan GN, Mani KT. Challenges in the formulation of bilayered tablets− A Review. Int. j. pharm. res. and dev. 2010;2:5.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes CM, Lobo JM, Pinto JF, Costa PC. Compressed matrix core tablet as a quick/slow dual-component delivery system containing ibuprofen. AAPS PharmSciTech 2007;8:E76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drug bank. Available at: http://www.drugbank.ca/search/search?query=carvedilol [Website]. Accessed on Feb 12, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Maggi L, Machiste EO, Torre ML, Conte U. Formulation of biphasic release tablets containing slightly soluble drugs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 1999;48:37–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo P, Bettini R, Santi P, Peppas NA. Swellable matrices for controlled drug delivery: gel-layer behavior, mechanisms and optimal performance. Pharm Sci Technol Today 1999;2:225–227.
   Google Scholar
• Kiil S, Dam-Johansen K. Controlled drug delivery from swellable hydroxypropylmethylcellulose matrices: model-based analysis of observed radial front movements. J Control Release 2003;90:1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim CJ. Drug release from compressed hydrophilic POLYOX-WSR tablets. J Pharm Sci 1995;84:303–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel GM, Patel MM. Compressed matrix dual-component vaginal drug delivery system containing metoclopramide hydrochloride. Acta Pharm 2009;59:273–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa P. An alternative method to the evaluation of similarity factor in dissolution testing. Int J Pharm 2001;220:77–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDER. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Guidance for Industry, Dissolution Testing of Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage; 1997. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/cder/Guidance/1713bp1.pdf [Website]. Accessed on July 1, 2009
   Google Scholar
• Dave BS, Amin AF, Patel MM. Gastroretentive drug delivery system of ranitidine hydrochloride: formulation and in vitro evaluation. AAPS PharmSciTech 2004;5:e34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior A, Frutos P, Correa CP. Comparison of dissolution profiles: Current guidelines. Docencia. Available from: http://www.sefig.com/doc/Congreso%20Granada/013_DOC.pdf [Website]. Assed on February 23, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Gibaldi M, Feldman S. Establishment of sink conditions in dissolution rate determinations. Theoretical considerations and application to nondisintegrating dosage forms. J Pharm Sci 1967;56:1238–1242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner JG. Interpretation of percent dissolved-time plots derived from in vitro testing of conventional tablets and capsules. J Pharm Sci 1969;58:1253–1257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuchi T. Rate of release of medicaments from ointment bases containing drugs in suspension. J Pharm Sci 1961;50:874–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuchi T. Mechanism of sustained-action medication. theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices. J Pharm Sci 1963;52:1145–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobby J, Mayersohn M, Walker GC. Influence of shape factors on kinetics of drug release from matrix tablets. II. Experimental. J Pharm Sci 1974;63:732–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hixson AW, Crowell JH. Dependence of reaction velocity upon surface and agitation. Ind Eng Chem 1931;23:923–931.
   Google Scholar
• Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker EM, Buri P, Peppas NA. Mechanism of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int J Pharm 1983;15:25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma S, Narang S. Development and in vitro evaluation of floating matrix tablets of anti Retroviral drug. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2011;3:208–211.
   Google Scholar
• Körner A, Piculell L, Iselau F, Wittgren B, Larsson A. Influence of different polymer types on the overall release mechanism in hydrophilic matrix tablets. Molecules 2009;14:2699–2716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamsani VV, Gannu R, Kolli C, Rao ME, Yamsani MR. Development and in vitro evaluation of buccoadhesive carvedilol tablets. Acta Pharm 2007;57:185–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar