Formulation and stability study of chlorpheniramine maleate nasal gel

References

• Shah AJ, Donovan MD. Rheological characterization of neutral and anionic polysaccharides with reduced mucocillary transport routes. Division of Pharmaceutics, University of Iowa City; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Shirui M, Shiling Y, Dianzhou B. Pharmacodynamics and potential toxicity of intranasally administered Dipyrone. Pharm Bull 2006;29(7):1355–1359.
   Google Scholar
• Khan GNM. New developments in insulin delivery. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2003;29:253–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M,Donovan MD. Intranasal mucociliary clearance of putative bioadhesive polymer gels. Int J Pharm 1996;135:115–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontiroli A. Intranasal calcitonin and plasma calcium concentration in normal subjects. BMJ 1985;290:1390–1395.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hussain A, Kimura R, Huang CH, Mustafa R. Nasal absorption of ergotamine tartrate in rats. Int J Pharm 1984;21:289–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor DF, Anderson I, Lundqvist G. Clearance of inhaled particles from human nose. Arch Int Med 1973;131:132–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Cruz OJ, Yiv SH, Uckun FM. A novel lipophilic vaginal contraceptive gel-microemulsion. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2001;2:E5–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan YTF, Peh KK, Al-Hanbali O. Effect of Carbopol and Polyvinyl pyrrolidone on the mechanical, rheological, and release properties of bioadhesive polyethylene glycol gels. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2000;1:E24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pitchard WH. The role of hydrogen bonding in adhesion. Aspects Adhes 1971;6:11.
   Google Scholar
• Rumore MM. Clinical pharmacokinetics of chlorpheneramine. Drug Int Clin Pharm 1984;180:701–707.
   Google Scholar
• Kanfer I, Dowse R, Vusumuzi V. Pharmacokinetics of oral decongestants,Pharmacotherapy 1993;13(6):16S–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block LH. Medicated applications. In: Gennaro AR, editor. Philadelphia: Remington; 1995: 1577–1591.
   Google Scholar
• Babu RJ, Pandit JK. Effect of penetration enhancers on the release and skin permeation of bupranolol from reservoir-type transdermal delivery systems. Int J Pharm 2005;288:325–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal SN. Preparation of hydrogels of grisofulvin for dermal application. Int J Pharm 2006;326:20–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skhmolka IR. Poloxamers in the pharmaceutical industry. In: Tarcha PJ, editor. Polymers for controlled drug delivery. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1991:189–214.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert AL, Martin MR, Gilbert SB. Pharmaceutical dosage forms, disperse systems. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1996:404–405.
   Google Scholar
• Michael EA. The science of dosage form design. London: Churchill Livingston; 2nd ed. Suspensions and emulsions. 2002:353–356.
   Google Scholar
• Ammar HO, Ghorab M, El-Nahhas SA, Kamel R. Design of transdermal delivery system for aspirin as an antithrombotic drug. Int J Pharm 2006;327:81–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feriggeri A, Feringa BL, Van Esch J. Entrapment and release of quinoline derivatives using a hydrogel of a low molecular weight gelator. J Control Rel 2004;97:241–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JY, Oh Y, Choi HG, Kim YB, Kim CK. Rheological evaluation of thermosensitive and mucoadhesive vaginal gels in physiological conditions. Int J Pharm 2002;241:155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callens C, Ceulemans J, Ludwing A, Foreman P, Remon JA. Rheological study on mucoadhesivity of some nasal powder formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2003;55:323–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck T, Leiacker R, Riechelmann H, Rettinger G. Temperature profile in the nasal cavity. Laryngoscope 2002;110:1651–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mygind N, Dahl R. Anatomy, physiology, and function of the nasal cavities in health and disease. Adv Drug Del Rev 1998;29:3–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Fassihi R. Zero order release kinetics from a self-;correcting floatable asymmetric configuration drug delivery system. J Pharm Sci 1996;85:170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Fassihi R. New ternary polymeric matrix system for controlled drug delivery of highly soluble drugs. Part 1. Diltiazem hydrochloride. Pharm Res 1997;14:1415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JY, Oh Y, Choi HG, Kim YB, Kim CK. Rheological evaluation of thermosensitive and mucoadhesive vaginal gels in physiological conditions. Int J Pharm 2002;241:155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peppas NA. Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release from polymers. Pharm Acta Helv 1985;60:110–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rita J, Pradip K, Manish L, Rayasa SR. Thermoreversible-mucoadhesive gel for nasal delivery of sumatriptan. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2006;7(3):E1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovon MD, Zhou M. Drug effects on in-vivo nasal clearance in rats. Int J Pharm 1995;116:77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Hemant H, Alur S, Indiran P, Ashim K, Thomas P. Transmucosal sustained-delivery of chlorpheneramine maleate in rabbits using a novel natural mucoadhesive gum as an exipient in buccal tablets. Int J Pharm 1999;188:1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laba D. The flow of cosmetics and toiletries. In: Rheological properties of cosmetics and toiletries. Vol. 13. 1st ed. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1993:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Varma MVS, Kaushal AM, Garg A, Garg S. Factors affecting mechanism and kinetics of drug release from matrix based oral controlled drug delivery systems. Am J Drug Deliv 2004;2:43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Katzhendler I, Mader K, Friedman M. Structure and hydration properties of Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose matrices containing naproxen and naproxen sodium. Int J Pharm 2000;200:161–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan LSC, Heng PWS, Wang LF. Relationship between swelling and drug release in hydrophilic matrix. Drug Deliv Ind Pharm 1993;19:1201–1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambhaji P, Vijay SI, Kakasaheb MI, Shivajirao KI. Effect of organogel components on in-vitro nasal delivery of Propranolol hydrochloride. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2004;5(4):Article 63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang SM, Athanikar NK, Sridhar K, Huang YC, Chiou WL. Pharmacokinetics of Chlorpheniramine maleate after intravenous and oral administration in normal adults. Eur J Pharmacol 1982;22:359–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noha MZ, Gehanne AA, Nahed DM, Seham SA. Rapid-onset intranasal delivery of metoclopramide hydrochloride. Part I. Influence of formulation variables on drug absorption in anesthetized rats. Int J Pharm 2006;327:89–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duchateau GS, Zuidema J, Albers WM, Merkus FW. Nasal absorption of alprenolol and metoprolol. Int J Pharm 1986;34:131–136.
   Google Scholar
• Kilian N, Muller DG. The effect of a viscosity and an absorption enhancer on the intra nasal absorption of metoprolol in rats. Int J Pharm 1998;163:211–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain A, Foster T, Hirai S, Kashihara T, Batenhorst R, Jones M. Nasal absorption of propranolol in humans. J Pharm Sci 1980;69:1240–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien YW. Nasal drug delivery systems. In: Swarbrick J, ;editor. Novel drug delivery systems. New York: Marcel Dekker 1992:139–196.
   Google Scholar
• Chovan JP, Klett RP, Rakietten N. Comparison of meclizine levels in the plasma of rats and dogs after intranasal, intravenous and oral administration. J Pharm Sci 1985;74:1111–1113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoester PD, Jonker DM, Van der Hoeven, Vermeij TAC, Edelbroek PM, Brekelmans GJ. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of midazolam administered as a concentrated intranasal spray. A study in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2002;53:501–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang SM, Huang YC, Chio WL. Oral absorption and presystemic first pass effect of Chlorpheniramine maleate in rabbits. J Phrmacokinet Biopharm 1981;9:725–738.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar