Direct versus Video Laryngoscopic Intubation by Novice Prehospital Intubators with and without Chest Compressions: A Pilot Manikin Study

References

• Wang HE, Seitz SR, Hostler D, Yealy DM.Defining the ‘‘learning curve’’ for paramedic student endotracheal intubation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005;9:156–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wayne M. Use of video laryngoscopy in a ground EMS system: better for you, better for your patients. JEMS. 2008;33 (9 suppl):11–3.
   Google Scholar
• Bjoernsen LP, Parquette BT, Lindsay MB. Prehospital use of video laryngoscope by an air medical crew. Air Med J. 2008;27:242–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aziz M, Dillman D, Kirsch JR, Brambrink A. Video laryngoscopy with the Macintosh video laryngoscope in simulated prehospital scenarios by paramedic students. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009;13:251–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakstad AR, Sandberg M. The GlideScope Ranger video laryngoscope can be useful in airway management of entrapped patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:1257–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildwine F. A throat with a view. Innovative video laryngoscope gives you a new angle. JEMS. 2007;32(2):86.
   Google Scholar
• Koyama J, Aoyama T, Kusano Y, Description and first clinical application of Airway Scope for tracheal intubation. J Neurosurg Anesthsiol. 2006;18:247–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lim Y, Lim TJ, Liu EHC. Ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Macintosh laryngoscope by inexperienced operators in simulated difficult airways. Can J Anaesth. 2004;51:641–2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miki T, Inagawa G, Kikuchi T, Koyama Y, Goto T. Evaluation of the Airway Scope, a new video laryngoscope, in tracheal intubation by naive operators: a manikin study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51:1378–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan BH, Liu EH, Lim RT, Liow LM, Goy RW. Ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Airway Scope by novice operators in simulated easy and difficult airways—a manikin study. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:187–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malik MA, Hassett P, Carney J, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG. A comparison of the Glidescope, Pentax AWS, and Macintosh laryngoscopes when used by novice personnel: a manikin study. Can J Anaesth. 2009;56:802–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadamori T, Kusunoki S, Ishida M, Otani T, Tanigawa K. Video laryngoscopy for emergency tracheal intubation during chest compression. Resuscitation. 2008;77:155–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han SK, Shin DH, Choi PC. Utility of the Pentax-AWS® without interruption of chest compression: comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope with the Pentax-AWS® in manikin model. Resuscitation. 2010;81:69–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cho J, Chung HS, Chung SP, Kim YM, Cho YS. Airway Scope vs. Macintosh laryngoscope during chest compressions on a fresh cadaver model. Am J Emerg Med. 2010;28: 741–1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2005 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 4: Adult basic life support. Circulation. 2005;112:IV19–IV34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatward JJ, Thomas MJ, Nolan JP, Cook TM. Effect of chest compressions on the time taken to insert airway devices in a manikin. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:351–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Heart Association guidelines 2000 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 6: Advanced cardiovascular life support: section 3: adjuncts for oxygenation, ventilation, and airway control. Circulation. 2000;102(8 suppl):I95–I104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nolan JP, Deakin CD, Soar J, Bottiger BW, Smith G. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 4. Adult for resuscitation advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2005; 67(suppl 1):S39–S86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg RA, Sanders AB, Kern KB, Adverse hemodynamic effects of interrupting chest compressions for rescue breathing during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2001;104: 2465–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 2005 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 7.1: Adjuncts for airway control and ventilation. Circulation. 2005;112:IV84–IV88.
   Google Scholar
• Pepe PE, Copass MK, Joyce TH. Prehospital endotracheal intubation: rationale for training emergency medical personnel. Ann Emerg Med. 1985;14:1085–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang HE, Simeone SJ, Weaver MD, Callaway CW. Interruptions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation from paramedic endotracheal intubation. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54:645–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakles JC, Rodgers R, Keim SM. Optical and video laryngoscopes for emergency airway management. Intern Emerg Med. 2008;3:139–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope®) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52:191–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platts-Mills TF, Campagne D, Chinnock B, Snowden B, Glickman LT, Hendey GW. A comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16:866–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serocki G, Bein B, Scholz J, Dörges V. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Maharaj CH, Costello JF, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Learning and performance of tracheal intubation by novice personnel: a comparison of the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:671–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowicki TA, Suozzi JC, Dziedzic M, Kamin R, Donahue S, Robinson K. Comparison of use of the the Airtraq with direct laryngoscopy by paramedics in the simulated airway. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009;13:75–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enomoto Y, Asai T, Arai T, Kamishima K, Okuda Y. Pentax-AWS, a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements: a randomized comparative study. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:544–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik MA, Subramaniam R, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Randomized controlled trial of the Pentax AWS, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in predicted difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:761–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar