Automatic non-linear MRI-ultrasound registration for the correction of intra-operative brain deformations

References

• Dorward N. Neuronavigation – the surgeon's sextant. Br J Neurosurg 1997; 11: 101–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golfinos J, Fitzpatrick B, Smith L, Spetzler R. Clinical use of a frameless stereotactic arm: result of 325 cases. Neurosurgery 1995; 83: 197–205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill D, Maurer C, Maciunas R, Barwise J, Fitzpatrick J, Wang M. Measurement of intraoperative brain surface deformation under a craniotomy. Neurosurgery 1998; 43: 514–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paleologos T, Wadley J, Kitchen N, Thomas D. Clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of interactive image-guided craniotomy: clinical comparison between conventional and image-guided meningioma surgery. Neurosurgery 2000; 47: 40–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer C, Aboutanos G, Dawant B, Gadamsetty S, Margolin R, Maciunas R, Fitzpatrick J. Effect of geometrical distortion correction in MR on image registration accuracy. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1996; 20: 666–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts D, Hartov A, Kennedy F, Miga M, Paulsen K. Intraoperative brain shift and deformation: a quantitative analysis of cortical displacement in 28 cases. Neurosurgery 1998; 43: 749–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabavi A, Black P, Gering D, Westin C, Mehta V, Pergolizzi R, Ferrant M, Warfield S, Hata N, Schwartz R, Wells W, Kikinis R, Jolesz F. Serial intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging of brain shift. Neurosurgery 2001; 48: 787–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black P, Alexander E, Martin C, Moriarty T, Nabavi A, Wong T, Schwartz R, Jolesz F. Craniotomy for tumor treatment in an intraoperative magnetic resonance unit. Neurosurgery 1999; 45: 423–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein M, Al-Anazi A, Kurcharczyk W, Manninen P, Bronskill M, Henkelman M. Brain tumor surgery with the Toronto open magnetic resonance imaging system: preliminary results for 36 patients and analysis of advantages, disadvantages, and future prospects. Neurosurgery 2000; 46(4)900–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtz C, Bonsanto M, Knauth M, Tronnier V, Albert F, Staubert A, Kunze S. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging to update interactive navigation in neurosurgery: Method and preliminary experience. Comput Aided Surg 1997; 2: 172–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts D, Miga M, Hartov A, Eisner S, Lemery J, Kennedy F, Paulsen K. Intraoperatively updated neuroimaging using brain modeling and sparse data. Neurosurgery 1999; 45: 1199–1207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miga M, Paulsen K, Lemery J, Eisner S, Hartov A, Kennedy F, Roberts D. Model-updated image guidance: Initial clinical experiences with gravity-induced brain deformation. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1999; 18: 866–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miga M I, Paulsen K D, Kennedy F E, Hartov A, Roberts D W (1999) Model-updated image-guided neurosurgery using the finite element method: Incorporation of the falx cerebri. Proceedings of Second International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI '99), CambridgeEngland, September, 1999, C Taylor, A Colchester. Springer, Berlin, 900–9, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1679
   Google Scholar
• Castellano-Smith A, Hartkens T, Schnabel J, Hose D, Liu H, Hall W, Truwit C, Hawkes D, Hill D (2001) Constructing patient specific models for correcting intraoperative brain deformations. Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2001), UtrechtThe Netherlands, October, 2001, W Niessen, M A Viergever. Springer, Berlin, 1091–99, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2208
   Google Scholar
• Audette M, Siddiqi K, Peters T (1999) Level-set surface segmentation and fast cortical range image tracking for computing intrasurgical deformations. Proceedings of Second International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI '99), CambridgeEngland, September, 1999, C Taylor, A Colchester. Springer, Berlin, 788–97, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1679
   Google Scholar
• Audette M, Ferrie F, Peters T. An algorithmic overview of surface registration techniques for medical imaging. Med Image Anal 2000; 4: 201–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronningsaeter A, Unsgard G, Ommedal S, Angelsen B. Ultrasound-guided neurosurgery: a feasibility study in the 3–30 MHz frequency range. Br J Neurosurg 1996; 10: 161–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammoud M, Ligon B L, ElSouki R, Shi W, Schomer D, Sawaya R. Use of intraoperative ultrasound for localizing tumors and determining the extent of resection: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 1996; 84: 737–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivukangas J, Louhisalmi Y, Alakuijala J, Oikarinen J. Ultrasound controlled neuronavigator-guided brain surgery. Neurosurgery 1993; 79: 36–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe J. The value of intraoperative ultrasound in neurosurgery. Br J Neurosurg 1991; 5: 169–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Comeau R, Sadikot A, Fenster A, Peters T. Intraoperative ultrasound for guidance and tissue shift correction in image-guided neurosurgery. Med Phys 2000; 27: 787–800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronningsaeter A, Kleven A, Ommedal S, Aarseth T, Lie T, Lindseth F, Lango T, Unsgard G. Sonowand an ultrasound-based neuronavigation system. Neurosurgery 2000; 47: 1373–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trobaugh J, Richard W, Smith K, Bucholz R. Frameless stereotactic ultrasonography: Methods and applications. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 1994; 18(4)235–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hata N, Dohi T, Iseki H, Takakura K. Development of a frameless and armless stereotactic neuronavigation system with ultrasonographic registration. Neurosurgery 1997; 41: 608–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschberg H, Unsgaard G. Incorporation of ultrasonic imaging in an optically coupled frameless stereotactic system. Acta Neurochir 1997; 68(Suppl)75–80
   Google Scholar
• Bucholz R, Sturm C, Henderson J. Detection of brain shift with an image guided ultrasound device. Acta Neurochirurgica 1996; 138: 627
   Google Scholar
• Bucholz R D, Yeh D D, Trobaugh J, McDurmont L L, Sturm C D, Baumann C, Henderson J M, Levy A, Kessman P (1997) The correction of stereotactic inaccuracy caused by brain shift using an intraoperative ultrasound device. Proceedings of First Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine and Medical Robotics and Computer-Assisted Surgery (CVRMed-MRCAS '97), GrenobleFrance, March, 1997, J Troccaz, E Grimson, R Mösges. Springer, Berlin, 459–66, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1205
   Google Scholar
• Erbe H, Kriete A, Jödicke A, Deinsberger W, Böker D K (1996) 3D-ultrasonography and image matching for detection of brain shift during intracranial surgery. Computer Assisted Radiology. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer and Communication Systems for Image Guided Diagnosis and Therapy (CAR '96), Paris, June, 1996, H U Lemke, M W Vannier, K Inamura, A G Farman. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 225–30
   Google Scholar
• Jödicke A, Deinsberger W, Erbe H. Intraoperative three-dimensional ultrasonography: an approach to register brain shift using multidimensional image processing. Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery 1998; 41: 13–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comeau R M, Fenster A, Peters T. Intraoperative US in interactive image-guided neurosurgery. Radiographics 1998; 19(4)1019–27
   Google Scholar
• Gobbi D G, Comeau R M, Peters T M (2000) Ultrasound/MRI overlay with image warping for neurosurgery. Proceedings of third International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2000), PitsburghPA, October, 2000, S L Delp, A M DiGioia, B Jaramaz. Springer, Berlin, 106–14, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1935
   Google Scholar
• Roche A, Pennec X, Rudolph M, Auer D P, Malandain G, Ourselin S, Auer L M, Ayache N (2000) Generalized correlation ratio for registration of 3D ultrasound with MR images. Proceedings of Third International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2000), Pittsburgh, PA, October, 2000, S L Delp, A M DiGioia, B Jaramaz. Springer, Berlin, 567–77, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1935
   Google Scholar
• Lunn K, Hartov A, Hansen E, Sun H, Roberts D, Paulsen K (2001) A quantitative comparison of edges in 3D intraoperative ultrasound and preoperative MR images of the brain. Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2001), UtrechtThe Netherlands, October, 2001, W Niessen, M A Viergever. Springer, Berlin, 1081–90, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2208
   Google Scholar
• Guimond A, Roche A, Ayache N, Meunier J. Three-dimensional multimodal brain warping using the demons algorithm and adaptive intensity corrections. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2001; 20: 58–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King A P, Blackall J M, Penney G P, Edwards P J, Hill D LG, Hawkes D J (2000) An estimation of intra-operative deformation for image-guided surgery using 3-D ultrasound. Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2001), Pitsburgh, PA, October, 2000, S L Delp, A M DiGioia, B Jaramaz. Springer, Berlin, 588–97, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1935
   Google Scholar
• Fenster A, Downey D. 3-D ultrasound imaging: A review. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 1996; 15(6)41–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prager R, Rohling R, Gee A, Berman L. Rapid calibration for 3-D freehand ultrasound. 1998; 24(6)855–69, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
   Google Scholar
• Rohling R N, Gee A H, Berman L. Three-dimensional spatial compounding of ultrasound images. Med Image Anal 1997; 1: 177–93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rohling R, Gee A, Berman L. A comparison of freehand three-dimensional ultrasound reconstruction techniques. Med Image Anal 1999; 3: 339–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neelin P, MacDonald D, Collins D, Evans A. The {MINC} file format: from bytes to brains. NeuroImage 1998; 7(4)786
   Google Scholar
• Blackall J M, Rueckert D, Maurer C R, Jr, Penney G P, Hill D LG, Hawkes D J (2000) An image registration approach to automated calibration from freehand 3D ultrasound. Pitsburgh, PA, October, 2000, S L Delp, A M DiGioia, B Jaramaz. Springer, Berlin, 463–70, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1935
   Google Scholar
• Burkhardt C B. Speckle in ultrasonic B-mode scans. IEEE Trans Sonics Ultrason 1998; SU-25: 1–25
   Google Scholar
• Collins D L, Evans A C. ANIMAL: validation and applications of non-linear registration-based segmentation. Int J Pattern Recog Artificial Intell 1997; 11: 1271–94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar