Computer navigated total knee arthroplasty: Aspects of a single unit's experience of 777 cases

References

• Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Computer Assisted Surgery in Primary Total Knee Replacement between 2006 and 2008. Request ID: 447. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• National Joint Registry for England and Wales 6th Annual Report. NJR Centre, Hemel Hempstead; 2009. p 72.
   Google Scholar
• Cocchhiarella L, Andersson GBJ. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. Fifth edition. American Medical Association. 1995; 549
   Google Scholar
• Insall JN, Dore LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; 248: 13–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes in antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1833–1840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 26-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Medical Care 1992; 30: 473–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Jr, Kosinski M, Dewey J. How to score version 2 of the SF-36 health survey. Quality Metric Incorporated, Lincoln, RI 2000
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM. Computer-assisted total knee replacement: A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86(6)818–823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scarff HP. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised trial comparing computer-navigation and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20(3)282–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seon JK, Song EK. Functional impact of navigation-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2005; 28-10: 1251–1254
   Google Scholar
• Choong P, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24(4)560–569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22(8)1097–2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauwens K, Mattes G, Wich M, Gedhard F, Hanson B, Ekkernkamp A, Stengel D. Navigated total knee replacement: A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(2)261–269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique: A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86(3)372–374
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rand JA, Coventry MB. Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 232: 168–173
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ritter MA, Faris P, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 299: 153–156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson B, Aström J. Alignment and long-term clinical results of a semiconstrained knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 226: 124–128
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ma HM, Lu YC, Ho FY, Huang CH. Long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 580–584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73(5)709–714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikorski JM. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90(9)1121–1127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikorski JM. Computer-assisted revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86(4)510–514
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: No difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89(4)477–480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvie P, Sloan K, Beaver RJ, Computer navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: Five-year functional results of a prospective randomised trial. J Arthroplasty 2011 (In press)
   Google Scholar
• Kalairajah Y, Cossey AJ, Verrall GM, Ludbrook G, Spriggins AJ. Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted knee surgery? A prospective, randomised, clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 88: 198–202
   Google Scholar
• Kim YH, Kim JS, Choi Y, Kwon OY. Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 14–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuhlberg SD, Yaffe MA, Koo SS. Computer-assisted surgery versus manual total knee arthroplasty: A case-controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88(Suppl 4)47–54
   Google Scholar
• Dong H, Buxton M. Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology: A Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2006; 22: 191–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalairajah Y, SD, Cossey AJ, Verrall GM, Spriggins AJ. Blood loss after total knee replacement: Effects of computer assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 1480–1482
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bierbaum BE, Callaghan JJ, Galante JO, Rubash HE, Tooms RE, Welch RB. An analysis of blood management in patients having total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81(1)2–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morawa LG, Manley MT, Edidin AA, Reilly DT. Transesophageal echocardiographic monitored events during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 331: 192–198
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Church JS, Scadden JE, Gupta RR, Cokis C, Williams KA, Janes GC. Embolic phenomena during computer-assisted and conventional toal knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 89: 481–485
   Google Scholar
• Ooi LH, Lo NN, Yeo SJ, Ong BC, Ding ZP, Lefi A. Does computer-assisted surgical navigation total knee arthroplasty reduce venous thromboembolism compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty?. Singapore Med J 2008; 49-8: 610–614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuhlberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacements: Results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84(Suppl 2)90–98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haytmanek CT, Pour AE, Restrepo C, Nikhil J, Parvizi J, Hozack WJ. Cognition following computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. A prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92: 92–97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Masri BA, MD. Commentary perspective on “Cognition following computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. A prospective cohort study” by Craig T Haytmanek, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92. http://www.ejbjs.org/Comments/2010/cp_jan10_masri.dtl
   Google Scholar
• Graham DJC, Harvie P, Sloan K, Beaver RJ, Morbidity of navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective review of 327 cases. J Arthroplasty 2011 (In press)
   Google Scholar
• Harvie P, Sloan K, Beaver RJ, Three-dimensional component alignment and functional outcome in computer navigated total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised study comparing two navigation systems. J Arthroplasty 2011 (In press)
   Google Scholar
• Dattani R, Patnail S, Kantak A, Tselentakis G. Navigation knee repalacement. International Orthopaedics 2009; 33: 7–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüring C, Bäthis H, Tingart M, Perlick L, Grifka J. Computer assistance in total knee replacement – a critical assessment of current health care technology. Comput Aided Surg 2006; 11(2)77–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24: 570–578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvie P, Scaddan M, Larkin J, Sloan K, Beaver RJ, Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Does component alignment differ in knees requiring manipulation: A retrospective cohort study of 281 patients. J Arthroplasty 2011 (In press)
   Google Scholar