Advanced search
Publication Cover
Computer Aided Surgery Volume 17, 2012 - Issue 2
Journal homepage
1,693
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Comparison of analog 2D and digital 3D preoperative templating for predicting implant size in total knee arthroplasty

Atsushi KobayashiAsakura Clinic, Maebashi, Gunma, JapanCorrespondence[email protected]
, MD,
Yoshinori IshiiIshii Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Clinic, Gyouda, Saitama, Japan
,
Mitsuhiro TakedaIshii Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Clinic, Gyouda, Saitama, Japan
,
Hideo NoguchiIshii Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Clinic, Gyouda, Saitama, Japan
,
Hiroshi HiguchiAsakura Clinic, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
&
Sinichi ToyabeCrisis Management Office, Niigata University, Niigata, Niigata, Japan
Pages 96-101 | Received 09 Jan 2011, Accepted 22 Nov 2011, Published online: 06 Feb 2012

References

  • Eggli S, Pisan M, Müller ME. The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80(3)382–390
  • Müller ME. Lessons of 30 years of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; 274: 12–21
  • Clarke IC, Gruen T, Matos M, Amstutz HC. Improved methods for quantitative radiographic evaluation with particular reference to total-hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976; 121: 83–91
  • Arora J, Sharma S, Blyth M. The role of pre-operative templating in primary total knee replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005; 13(3)187–189
  • Aslam N, Lo S, Nagarajah K, Pasapula C, Akmal M. Reliability of preoperative templating in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 2004; 70(6)560–564
  • Heal J, Blewitt N. Kinemax total knee arthroplasty: Trial by template. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17(1)90–94
  • Howcroft DW, Fehily MJ, Peck C, Fox A, Dillon B, Johnson DS. The role of preoperative templating in total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of three prostheses. Knee 2006; 13(6)427–429
  • Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86(3)372–377
  • Jazrawi LM, Birdzell L, Kummer FJ, Di Cesare PE. The accuracy of computed tomography for determining femoral and tibial total knee arthroplasty component rotation. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15(6)761–766
  • Müller W, Bockholt U, Voss G, Lahmer A, Börner M. Planning system for computer assisted total knee replacement. Stud Health Technol Inform 2000; 70: 214–219
  • Sato T, Koga Y, Omori G. Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment assessment system. Application to evaluation of component positioning after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19: 620–628
  • Sato T, Koga Y, Sobue T, Omori G, Tanabe Y, Sakamoto M. Quantitative 3-dimensional analysis of preoperative and postoperative joint lines in total knee arthroplasty: A new concept for evaluation of component alignment. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 560–568
  • Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM. Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86(6)818–823
  • van der Linden-van der Zwaag HM, Wolterbeek R, Nelissen RG. Computer assisted orthopedic surgery; its influence on prosthesis size in total knee replacement. Knee 2008; 15(4)281–285
  • The B, Diercks RL, van Ooijen PM, van Horn J. Comparison of analog and digital preoperative planning in total hip and knee arthroplasties. A prospective study of 173 hips and 65 total knees. Acta Orthop 2005; 76(1)78–84
  • Specht LM, Levitz S, Iorio R, Healy WL, Tilzey JF. A comparison of acetate and digital templating for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 464: 179–183
  • Sugano N, Ohzono K, Nishii T, Haraguchi K, Sakai T, Ochi T. Computed-tomography-based computer preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 1998; 3(6)320–324
  • Viceconti M, Chiarini A, Testi D, Taddei F, Bordini B, Traina F, Toni A. New aspects and approaches in pre-operative planning of hip reconstruction: A computer simulation. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2004; 389(5)400–404

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.