The challenges of everyday technology in the workplace for persons with acquired brain injury

References

• Shames J, Treger I, Ring H, Giaquinto S. Return to work following traumatic brain injury: Trends and challenges. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1387–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treger I, Shames J, Giaquinto S, Ring H. Return to work in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1397–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestling M, Tufvesson B, Iwarsson S. Indicators for return to work after stroke and the importance of work for subjective well-being and life satisfaction. J Rehabil Med 2003;35:127–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson U, Högberg H, Bernspång B. Participation in everyday occupations in a late phase of recovery after brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther 2007;14:116–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wehman P, Gentry T, West M, Arango-Lasprilla JC. Community integration: Current issues in cognitive and vocational rehabilitation for individuals with ABI. J Rehabil Res Dev 2009;46:909–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röding J. Stroke in younger. Self-reported impact on work situation, cognitive function, physical function and life satisfaction. Doctoral thesis, Umeå University; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hofgren C, Esbjörnsson E, Sunnerhagen KS. Return to work after acquired brain injury: Facilitators and hindrances observed in a sub-acute rehabilitation setting. Work 2010;36:431–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dawson DR, Schwartz ML, Winocur G, Stuss DT. Return to productivity following traumatic brain injury: Cognitive, psychological, physical, spiritual, and environmental correlates. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:301–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyser-Marcus LA, Bricout JC, Wehman P, Campbell LR, Cifu DX, Englander J, et al. Acute predictors of return to employment after traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:635–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Naalt J. Prediction of outcome in mild to moderate head injury: A review. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2001;23:837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker WC, Marwitz JH, Kreutzer JS, Hart T, Novack TA. Occupational categories and return to work after traumatic brain injury: A multicenter study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:1576–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygård L, Starkhammar S. The meaning of everyday technology as experienced by people with dementia who live alone. Dementia 2008;7:481–502.
   Google Scholar
• Emiliani PL. Assistive technology (AT) versus mainstream technology (MST): Rhe research perspective. Technol Disabil 2006;18:19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Lange ML, Smith R. Technology and occupation: Contemporary viewpoints. The future of electronic aids to daily living. Am J Occup Ther 2002;6:107–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lindén A, Lexell J, Larsson Lund M. Perceived difficulties using everyday technology after acquired brain injury: Influence on activity and participation. Scand J Occup Ther 2010;17:267–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lövgren-Engström A-L, Lexell J, Lund ML. Difficulties in using everyday technology after acquired brain injury: A qualitative analysis. Scand J Occup Ther 2010;17:233–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsson Lund M, Lövgren-Engström A-L, Lexell J. Using everyday technology to compensate for difficulties in task performance in daily life: Experiences in persons with acquired brain injury and their significant others. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2011;6:402–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 3rd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson B, Scott-Findlay S. Critical issues in interviewing people with traumatic brain injury. Qual Health Res 2002;12:399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton MP. Environment and aging. 2nd ed. Albany,NY: Plenum; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. A model of human occupation: Theory and application. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher A. Occupational therapy intervention process model: A model for planning and implementing top-down, client-centred, and occupation-based interventions. Fort Collins: Three Star Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Cooper B, Strong S, Stewart D, Rigby P, Letts L. The person–environment–occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Can J Occup Ther 1996;63:9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lenker JA, Paquet VL. A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assist Technol 2003;15:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack W, McPherson K, McNaughton H. Success in the workplace following traumatic brain injury: Are we evaluating what is most important? Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:290–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson Lund M, Lövgren Engström A-L, Lexell J. Response actions to difficulties in using everyday technology after acquired brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther 2012;19:164–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinowsky C, Nygård L, Kottorp A. Psychometric evaluation of a new assessment of the ability to manage technology in everyday life. Scand J Occup Ther 2011;18:26–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinowsky C, Almkvist O, Kottorp A, Nygård L. Ability to manage everyday technology: A comparison of persons with dementia or mild cognitive impairment and older adults without cognitive impairment. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2010;5:462–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johansson B, Berglund P, Rönnbäck L. Mental fatigue and impaired information processing after mild and moderate traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2009;23:1027–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson J, Pettigrew L, Teasdale G. Structured interviews for the GOS and the GOS-E: Guidelines for daily use. J Neurotrauma 1998;5:573–85.
   Google Scholar
• International Labor Office [ILO] International Standard Classification of Occupations: ISCO-88. Geneva: ILO; 1990.
   Google Scholar