The measurement properties of the Occupational Circumstances Interview and Rating Scale - Sweden (OCAIRS-S V2)

References

• Creek J. Occupational therapy as defined as a complex intervention. London: College of Occupational Therapists; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. Health impact assessment: Main concepts and suggested approach: The Gothenburg Consensus Paper. Brussels: WHO Regional Office for Europe. [online] 1999. cited 2012 Nov 14 Available from http://www.who.dk/document/PAE/Gothenburgpaper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Model of Human Occupation: Theory and application. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Cubie S, Kaplan K. A case analysis method for the model of human occupation. Am J Occup Ther 1982;36:645–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan K. Short-term assessment: The need and a response. Occup Ther Ment Health 1984;4:29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Watts JH, Brollier D, Bauer D, Schmidt W. A comparison of two evaluation instruments used with psychiatric patients in occupational therapy. Occup Ther Ment Health 1989;8:7–27.
   Google Scholar
• Watts J H, Kielhofner G, Bauer D, Gregory M, Valentine D. The assessment of occupational functioning: A screening tool for use in long-term care. Am J Occup Ther 1986;40:231–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brollier C, Watts JH, Bauer D, Schmidt W. A concurrent validity study of two occupational therapy evaluation instruments: The AOF and OCAIRS. Occup Ther Ment Health 1989a;8:49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Haglund L, Henriksson C. Testing a Swedish version of OCAIRS on two different patient groups. Scand J Caring Sci 1994;8:223–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haglund L, Thorell L, Walinder J. Assessment of occupational functioning for screening of patients to occupational therapy in general psychiatric care. Occup Ther J Res 1998;18:193–206.
   Google Scholar
• Lai J, Haglund L, Kielhofner G. The Occupational Case Analysis Interview and Rating Scale: Construct validity and directions for future development. Scand J Caring Sci 1999;13:231–40.
   Google Scholar
• Wright BD, Stone MH. The Best Test design. Chicago: MESA Press; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Merbitz C, Morris J, Grip JC. Ordinance scales and foundations of misinference. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1989;70:308–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright BD, Linacre JM. Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989;70:857–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashway F.M. Objective mental measurement: Individual program evaluation using the Rasch model. Praeger special studies. New York: Praeger; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Many-facet: Rasch measurement. Chicago: Mesa Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth K, Deshpande S, Kielhofner G, Henriksson C, Haglund L, Olson L, et al. A user's manual for the Occupational Circumstances Assessment Interview and Rating Scale (OCAIRS). Version 4.0. Chicago: University of Illinois; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. Crosscultural assessment of process skills. Am J Occup Ther 1992;46:876–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries D, Littlejohns P, Victor C, O'Halloran P, Peacock J. Implementing evidence-based practice: Factors which influence the use of research by occupational therapists. Br J Occup Ther 2000;63:526–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett S, Tooth L, McKenna K, Rodger S, Strong J, Ziviani J, et al. Perceptions of evidence-based practice: A survey of Australian occupational therapists. Aust Occup Ther J 2003;50:13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Katz LJ. ADHD in adults: The syndrome and its reconceptualization. In Katz LJ, Lynda J, editors. Contemporary neurobehavioral syndromes. New York: Psychology Press; 2011. p 71–109.
   Google Scholar
• Haglund L, Thorell L, Wålinder J. Occupational functioning in relation to psychiatric diagnoses: Schizophrenia and mood disorders. Nord J Psychiatry 1998;52:223–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brollier C, Watts JH, Bauer D, Schmidt W. The assessment of occupational functioning: The second version. Occup Ther Ment Health 1989;8:61–87.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). [online] 2001. cited 2012 Nov 14 Available from http://www.who.int/ classifications/icf/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer J, Bowyer P, Kielhofner G. Evidence for practice from the Model of Human Occupation. In Kielhofner G, editor. The Model of Human Occupation. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p 466–506.
   Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Üstün B, Stucki G. ICF linking rules: An update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:212–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar