The complexity of role balance: Support for the Model of Juggling Occupations

References

• Duxbury L, Higgins C. Work–life conflict in Canada in the new millennium: a status report [Internet]. Health Canada, Population and Public Health Branch; 2003. cited 2013 Nov 10 Available online at http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/H72-21-186-2003E.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Goward P, Mihailuk T, Moyle S, O'Connell K, de Silva N, Squire S, et al. Striking the balance: women, men, work and family. Canberra: Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (Australia); 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Squire S, Tilly J. It's about time: women, men, work and family. Canberra: Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (Australia); 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Craig L. Is there really a second shift, and if so, who does it? A time-diary investigation. Feminist Rev 2007;86:149–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins R, Hughes J, Tomyn A, Gibson A, Woerner J, Lai L. The wellbeing of Australians: carer health and wellbeing [Internet]. Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University; 2007. cited 2013 Nov 10 Available online at http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/auwbi/survey-reports/survey-017-1-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett R, Hyde J. Women, men, work, and family: an expansionist theory. Am Psychol 2001;56:781–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooklin A, Fagenblat H, Feldman S, Rubens J, Solomon G. Superwomen: a contextual study of Jewish sandwich generation women balancing intergenerational family responsibilities in multicultural Australia. Caulfield, Victoria: National Council of Jewish Women of Australia; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Martire L, Stephens M, Franks M. Multiple roles of women caregivers: feelings of mastery and self-esteem as predictors of psychosocial well-being. J Women Aging 1997;9:117–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastekaasa A. Parenthood, gender and sickness absence. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:1827–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evandrou M, Glaser K. Family, work and quality of life: changing economic and social roles through the lifecourse. Ageing Soc 2004;24:771–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backman C, Anaby D. Research directions for advancing the study of life balance and health. In Matuska K, Christiansen C, editors. Life balance: multidisciplinary theories and research. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK; 2009. p 257–68.
   Google Scholar
• Marks S. Multiple roles and life balance: an intellectual journey. In Matuska K, Christiansen C, editors. Life balance: multidisciplinary theories and research. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK; 2009. p 43–58.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen C, Matuska K. Lifestyle balance: a review of concepts and research. J Occup Sci 2006;13:49–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Backman C. Occupational balance: exploring the relationship among daily occupations and their influence on well-being. Can J Occup Ther 2004;71:202–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marks S, MacDermid S. Multiple roles and the self: a theory of role balance. J Marriage Fam 1996;58:417–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirgy J. The psychology of quality of life. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Model of human occupation: theory and application. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gudmundsson A. Balancing work and family: perspectives of Australian dual-earner parents. Dissertation, Griffith University; Southport, Queensland: 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Pocock B, Williams P, Skinner N. The Australian Work and Life Index (AWALI): concepts, methodology and rationale [Internet]. Centre for Work + Life, University of South Australia; 2007. cited 2013 Nov 10 Available online at www.unisa.edu.au/hawkeinstitute/cwl/documents/awali-concepts.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ezzedeen SR, Ritchey KG. Career and family strategies of executive women: revisiting the quest to “have it all”. Organ Dyn 2009;38:270–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wattis L, Standing K, Yerkes MA. Mothers and work–life balance: exploring the contradictions and complexities involved in work–family negotiation. Community Work Fam 2013;16:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen H. Actor and partner effects of strategies to manage and to cope with conflict between work and family roles. Dissertation, University of Minnesota; Minneapolis: 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wagman P, Björklund A, Håkansson C, Jacobsson C, Falkmer T. Perceptions of life balance among a working population in Sweden. Qual Health Res 2011;21:410–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagman P, Håkansson C, Björklund A. Occupational balance as used in occupational therapy: a concept analysis. Scand J Occup Ther 2012;19:322–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagman P, Håkansson C, Jacobsson C, Falkmer T, Björklund A. What is considered important for life balance? Similarities and differences among some working adults. Scand J Occup Ther 2012;19:377–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhaus J, Powell G. When work and family are allies: a theory of work–family enrichment. Acad Manage Rev 2006;31:72–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhaus J, Beutell N. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Acad Manage Rev 1985;10:76–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid J, Hardy M. Multiple roles and well-being among midlife women: testing role strain and role enhancement theories. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1999;54:329–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal M, Hammer L. Dual-earner couples in the sandwiched generation: effects of coping strategies over time. Psychol Manag J 2009;12:205–34.
   Google Scholar
• Håkansson C, Matuska K. How life balance is perceived by Swedish women recovering from a stress-related disorder: a validation of the life balance model. J Occup Sci 2010;17:112–19.
   Google Scholar
• Matuska K, Christiansen C. A proposed model of lifestyle balance. J Occup Sci 2008;15:9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wagman P, Håkansson C, Matuska K, Björklund A, Falkmer T. Validating the Model of Lifestyle Balance on a working Swedish population. J Occup Sci 2012;19:106–14.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood N, Mackenzie A, Cloud GC, Wilson N. Informal primary carers of stroke survivors living at home: challenges, satisfactions and coping: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:337–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady G, McCarthy AM. Work–life integration: experiences of mid-career professional working mothers. J Manag Psychol 2008;23:599–622.
   Google Scholar
• Aluko Y. Work–family conflict and coping strategies adopted by women in academia. Gender Behav 2009;7:2095–122.
   Google Scholar
• Pentland W, McColl M. Another perspective on life balance: living in integrity with values. In Matuska K, Christiansen C, editors. Life balance: multidisciplinary theories and research. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK; 2009. p 165–79.
   Google Scholar
• Watts J. “Allowed into a man's world” Meanings of work–life balance: perspectives of women civil engineers as “minority” workers in construction. Gender Work Organ 2009;16:37–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikandrou I, Panayotopoulou L, Apospori E. The impact of individual and organizational characteristics on work–family conflict and career outcomes. J Manag Psychol 2008;23:576–98.
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez S. Cultivating strategies for success: how mid-level women leaders of color in student affairs navigate the balance of work and family. Dissertation, University of Southern California; Los Angeles: 2013.
   Google Scholar
• AARP. In the middle: A report on multicultural boomers coping with family and aging issues Washington: AARP. 2001. 15 December 2007 Available online at http://www.aarp.org/research/housing-mobility/caregiving/aresearch-import-789-D17446.html.
   Google Scholar
• Grant-Vallone E, Ensher E. Opting in between: strategies used by professional women with children to balance work and family. J Career Dev 2011;38:331–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose J, Hewitt B, Baxter J. Women and part-time employment: easing or squeezing time pressure? J Sociol 2013;49:41–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossek E, Lautsch B, Eaton S. Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness. J Vocat Behav 2006;68:347–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood J, Tootell B. Is entrepreneurship the answer to achieving work–family balance? J Manage Organ 2008;14:285–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin R. Case study research: design and methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics A. Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Australia. 2011. Table 1. Postal Area (POA), SEIFA Summary, 2011, data cube: Excel spreadsheet, ABS cat. no. 2033.0.55.001 2013 cited 2013 Nov 1 Available online at http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/Lookup/2033.0.55.001main+features100132011.
   Google Scholar
• Ware J, Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker D, Gandek B. User's manual for the SF-12v2(R) health survey (with a supplement documenting version 1). Lincoln: QualityMetric; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• International Wellbeing Group. Personal Wellbeing Index [Internet]. Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University; 2006. cited 2013 Nov 10 Available online at http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing_index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley F, Kielhofner G, Barris R, Klinger Reichler R. The role checklist: development and empirical assessment of reliability. Occup Ther J Res 1986;6:157–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks S, Huston T, Johnson E, MacDermid S. Role balance among white married couples. J Marriage Fam 2001;63:1083–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little B, Gee T. The methodology of personal project analysis: four modules and a funnel. In Little B, Salmela-aro K, Phillips S, editors. Personal project pursuit: goals, action, and human flourishing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007. p 51–93.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen C, Little B, Backman C. Personal projects: a useful approach to the study of occupation. Am J Occup Ther 1998;52:439–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little B, Lecci L, Watkinson B. Personality and personal projects: linking big five and PAC units of analysis. J Pers 1992;60:501–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hektner J, Schmidt J, Csikszentmihalyi M. Experience sampling method: measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Pentland W, Harvey A, Powell Lawton M, McColl M. Application of time use methodology in the social sciences. Hingham, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• DePoy E, Gitlin L. Introduction to research: understanding and applying multiple strategies. 3rd ed. St Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth K, Deshpande S, Kielhofner G, Henriksson C, Haglund L, Olson L, et al. The occupational circumstances assessment interview and rating scale (OCAIRS) (Version 4.0). Chicago: Model of Human Occupation Clearinghouse; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hektner J. Family, school, and community predictors of adolescent growth-conductive experiences: global and specific approaches. Appl Dev Sci 2001;5:172–83.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Huberman M, Miles M, editors. The qualitative researcher's companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002. p 305–29.
   Google Scholar
• Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther 1991;45:214–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson C, Dahlin Ivanoff S, Sonn U. Achieving balance in everyday life. J Occup Sci 2006;13:74–82.
   Google Scholar
• Kim-Prieto C, Diener E, Tamir M, Scollon C, Diener M. Integrating the diverse definitions of happiness: a time-sequential framework of subjective well-being. J Happiness Stud 2005;6:261–300.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie C, Yu F. Mixed methods sampling: a typology with examples. J Mixed Methods Res 2007;1:77–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickerson A. Securing samples for effective research across research designs. In Kielhofner G, editor. Research in occupational therapy: methods of inquiry. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 2006. p 515–29.
   Google Scholar
• Heinz A, Pentland W. Professional coaching for life balance. In Matuska K, Christiansen C, editors. Life balance: multidisciplinary theories and research. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK; 2009. p 241–55.
   Google Scholar