Relative distancing: A grounded theory of how learners negotiate the interprofessional

References

• Adams A.. 2003. The modernisation of social work practice and management in England. Eichstatt: ISIS.
   Google Scholar
• Adams A.. 2005. Theorising interprofessionalism. In: H. Colyer, M. Helme, I. Jones. editors. The theory–practice relationship in interprofessional education. London: Higher Education Academy, HSP31–37 Occasional Paper No. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Allport G.. 1954. The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes D., Carpenter J., Dickinson C.. Interprofessional education for community mental health: Attitudes to community care and professional stereotypes. Social Work Education. 2000; 19 6: 565–583.
   Google Scholar
• Barr H.. Competent to collaborate: Towards a competency-based model for interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 1998; 12 2: 181–187.
   Google Scholar
• Barr H.. 2002. Interprofessional education: Today, yesterday and tomorrow. London: The Higher Education Academy, HSP Occasional Paper No. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Barr H., Ross F.. Mainstreaming interprofessional education in the United Kingdom: A position paper. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2006; 20 2: 96–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benner P.. 1984. From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer H.. 1969. Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron A.. 2000. New role developments in context. In: D. Humphries, A. Masterson. editors. Developing new clinical roles. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter J.. Doctors and nurses: Stereotypes and stereotype change in interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 1995; 9 2: 151–161.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter J., Hewstone M.. Shared learning for doctors and social workers: Evaluation of a programme. British Journal of Social Work. 1996; 26 2: 239–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Challis L., Fuller S., Henwood M., Klein R., Polwden W., Webb A., Whittingham P., Wistow G.. 1988. Joint approaches to social policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K.. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clark P.. What would a theory of interprofessional education look like? Some suggestions for developing a theoretical framework for teamwork training. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2006; 20 6: 577–589.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke A.. 2005. Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• D'Eon M.. A blueprint for interprofessional learning. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2005; 19 supplement 1: 49–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Department of Health. 1997. The new NHS. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. 2000. The NHS plan. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. 2003. The NHS plan – a progress report. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. 2006. Our health, our care, our say: A new direction for community services. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. 2010. Liberating the NHS: Regulating health care providers. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Dey I.. 1999. Grounding grounded theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeth D., Hammick M., Reeves S., Koppel I., Barr H.. 2005. Effective interprofessional education: Development, delivery and application. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert J., Bainbridge L.. 2003. Canada – interprofessional education and collaboration: Theoretical challenges, practical solutions. In: A. Leathard. editors. Interprofessional collaboration: From policy to practice in health and social care. London: Routledge280–296.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser B.. 1978. Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser B.. 1998. Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser B.. 2005. The grounded theory perspective III: Theoretical coding. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L.. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E.. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Hean S., Dickinson C.. The contact hypothesis: An exploration of its further potential in interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2005; 19 5: 480–491.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hean S., Barr H., Borthwick A., Carr E., Craddock D., Dickenson C., Hammick M., . 2008. Evolving IPE theory for practice: The outcomes of discussion from a seminar series. Retrieved from http://ihcs.bournemouth.ac.uk/etipe/pdf/s1reflect.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hean S., Craddock D., O'Halloran C.. Learning theories and interprofessional education: A user's guide. Learning in Health and Social Care. 2009; 8 4: 250–262.
   Google Scholar
• Hean S., Craddock D., Hammick M.. Theoretical insights into interprofessional education: AMEE Guide No. 62. Medical Teacher. 2012; 34:e78–e101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewstone M., Brown R.. 1986. Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the ‘contact hypothesis’. In: M. Hewstone, R. Brown. editors. Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters. Oxford: Blackwell3–44.
   Google Scholar
• Holstein J., Gubrium J.. 2003. Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns. In: J. Holstein, J. Gubrium. editors. Inside interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hornsey M., Hogg M.. The effects of status on subgroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology. 2002; 41 2: 203–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour B.. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave J., Wenger E.. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard J.-F.. 1984. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller B.. Skills for sale: What is being commodified in higher education?. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2010; 34 2: 199–206.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves S.. Ideas for the development of the interprofessional field. Journal of Interprofesssional Care. 2010; 24 3: 217–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves S., Suter E., Goldman J., Martimianakis T., Chatalalsingh C., Dematteo D.. 2007. A scoping review to identify organisational and educational theories relevant for interprofessional practice and education. Retrieved from http://meds.queensu.ca/quipped/assets/ScopingReview_IP_Theories_Dec07.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, R. (2004). The destruction of public higher education in America, and how the UK can avoid the same fate. Second Higher Education Policy Institute Lecture delivered 25 March 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson D.. 2000. Students as consumers: The individualisation of competitive advantage. In: P. Scott. editors. Higher education reformed. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shumar W.. 1997. College for sale: A critique of the commodification of higher education. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley J.. 1980. Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans S., Tavory I.. 2007. Advancing ethnographic research through grounded theory practice. In: A. Bryant, K. Charmaz. editors. The Sage handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage493–512.
   Google Scholar
• Turner J.. 1999. Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorisation theories. In: N. Ellemers, R. Spears, B. Doosje. editors. Social identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Turner J., Hogg M., Oakes P., Reicher S., Wetherall M.. 1987. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisation theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wackerhausen S.. Collaboration, professional identity and reflection across boundaries. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2009; 23 5: 455–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger E.. 1999. Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation (WHO). 2010. Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation Study Group. 2010. Interprofessional education and collaborative practice glossary. Retrieved on 25 July 2010 from http://cihc.wikispaces.com/Interprofessional+Glossary.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman D., Wieder D.. The diary-interview method. Urban Life. 1977; 5:479–498.
   Google Scholar