The use of systems and organizational theories in the interprofessional field: Findings from a scoping review

References

• Adler N.. A typology of management studies involving culture. Journal of International Business Studies. 1983; 14:29–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavi M., Leidner D.. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems, conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly. 2001; 25:107–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris C., Schön D.. 1978. Organisational learning. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Barr H.. Toward a theoretical framework for interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 20121–6 Early Online.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr H., Koppel I., Reeves S., Hammick M., Freeth D.. 2005. Effective interprofessional education: Assumption, argument and evidence. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett C., Ghoshal S.. Beyond the M-form: Toward a managerial theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal. 1993; 14:23–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry J., Annis R.. Acculturative stress: The role of ecology, culture and differentiation. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology. 1974; 5:382–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs J.. From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research and Development. 1993; 12:73–85.
   Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J., Nobel R., Ridderstrale J.. Knowledge as a contingency variable: Do the characteristics of knowledge predict organizational structure?. Organization Science. 2002; 13:274–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannon S.D., Kemper P., Barry T.. North Carolina's direct care workforce development journey: The case of the North Carolina New Organizational Vision Award Partner Team. Health Care Management Review. 2009; 34 3: 284–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caroll G.. A sociological view on why firms differ. Strategic Management Journal. 1993; 14:237–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherns A.. The principles of socio-technical design. Human Relations. 1976; 29:783–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark P.G.. What would a theory of interprofessional education look like?. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2006; 20 6: 577–589.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooper H., Braye S., Geyer R.. Complexity and interprofessional education. Learning in Health and Social Care. 2004; 3:179–189.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree B.F., Nutting P.A., Miller W.L., McDaniel R.R., Stange K.C., Jaén C.R., Stewart E.. Primary care practice transformation is hard work: Insights from a 15-year developmental program of research. Medical Care. 2011; 49:S28–S35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert R., March J.. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Damschroder L.J., Aron D.C., Keith R.E., Kirsh S.R., Alexander J.A., Lewery J.C.. Fostering implementation of health services research finding into practice: Consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science. 2009; 4:50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W.. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organization fields. American Sociological Review. 1983; 48:147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engestrom Y., Engestrom R., Vahaaho T.. 1999. When the center does not hold: The importance of knotworking. In: S. Chaklin, M. Hedegaard, U. Jensen. editors. Activity theory and social practice. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman R.E.. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Freeth D., Reeves S.. Learning to work together: Using presage, process, product (3P) model to highlight decisions and possibilities. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2004; 18:43–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gersick C.J.. Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review. 1991; 16:10–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg L., Tregunno D.. New approaches to interprofessional education and collaborative practice: Lessons from the organizational change literature. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2005; 19:177–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hannan M., Freeman J.. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review. 1984; 49:149–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hean S., Craddock D., O'Halloran C.. Learning theories and interprofessional education: A user's guide. Learning in Health and Social Care. 2009; 8 4: 250–262.
   Google Scholar
• Hean S., Craddock D., Hammick M.. Theoretical insights into interprofessional education: AMEE Guide No. 62. Medical Teacher. 2012; 34:e78–e101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman M., Ajdari S., Esquivel M., Chernof B., Tamm N., Landowski L., Guterman J.. Quality improvement principles in practice: The reduction of umbilical cord blood errors in the labor and delivery suite. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 1998; 12:47–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller F.. Socio-technology and the environment. Human Relations. 1997; 50:605–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helme, M., Jones, M., & Coyler, H. (2005). The theory-practice relationship in interprofessional education. Health Sciences and Practice Repository, Retrieved from http://repos.hsap.kcl.ac.uk/content/col10007/1.4/.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey M., Kleefield S., Pearson S., Hassan S., Harding M., Haughie P., Lee T.H., Brennan T.. Payer-hospital collaboration to improve patient satisfaction with hospital discharge. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement. 1996; 22:336–344.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hummels J.. Teamwork and morality: Comparing lean production and socio-technology. Journal of Business Ethics. 2000; 26:75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo Y., Steers R.. Cultural influences on the design of incentive systems: The case of east Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 1993; 10:71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Jawahar I., McLaughlin G.. Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach. Academy of Management Review. 2001; 26:317–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen M.. Value maximization, stakeholder theory and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. 2001; 14:8–21.
   Google Scholar
• Kamal M.. IT innovation adoption in the government sector: Identifying the critical success factors. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 2006; 19:192–222.
   Google Scholar
• Kelner M., Wellman B., Boon H., Walsh S.. Responses of established healthcare to the professionalization of complementary and alternative medicine in Ontario. Social Science and Medicine. 2004; 59:915–930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent R.. 2001. Installing change: An executive guide for implementing and maintaining organizational change. Winnipeg: Pragma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krippner S.. Humanistic psychology and chaos theory: The third revolution and the third force. Journal of Human Psychology. 1994; 34:53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence P., Lorsch J.. 1967. Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin K.. 1951. Field theory in social science selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Leykum L.K., Parchman M., Pugh J., Lawrence V., Noël P.H., McDaniel R.R.. The importance of organizational characteristics for improving outcomes in patients with chronic disease: A systematic review of congestive heart failure. Implementation Science. 2010; 5:66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra Y., Galletta D.Role of commitment and motivation in knowledge management systems implementation: Theory, conceptualization and measurement of antecedents of success2003 Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. 6–9 January 2003, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• McMaster T., Wastell D.. Diffusion or delusion? Challenging an IS research tradition. Information Technology and People. 2005; 18:383–404.
   Google Scholar
• Michie S., Fixsen D., Grimshaw J.M., Eccles M.P.. Specifying and reporting complex behaviour interventions: The need for a scientific method. Implementation Science. 2009; 4:40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montjoy R., O'Toole L.. Toward a theory of policy implementation: An organizational perspective. Public Administration Review. 1979; 39 5: 465–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulding N., Silagy C., Weller D.. A framework for effective management of change in clinical practice: Dissemination and implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Quality in Health Care. 1999; 8:177–183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reeves S.. Using the sociological imagination in the interprofessional field. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2011; 25:317–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves S., Goldman J., Gilbert J., Tepper J., Silver I., Suter E., Zwarenstein M.. A scoping review to improve conceptual clarity of interprofessional interventions. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2011; 25:167–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves S.. Ideas for the development of the interprofessional field. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2010; 24 3: 217–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves S., Lewin S., Espin S., Zwarenstein M.. 2010. Interprofessional teamwork for health and social care. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, S., Suter, E., Goldman, J., Martimianski, T., Chatalasingh, C., & Dematteo, D. (2007). A scoping review to identify organizational and educational theories relevant for interprofessional practice and education., Retrieved from http://www.cihc.ca/files/publications/ScopingReview_IP_Theories_Dec07.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves S., Freeth D.. Re-examining the evaluation of interprofessional education for community mental health teams with a different lens: Understanding presage, process and product factors. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 2006; 13:765–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves S., Lewin S.. Interprofessional collaboration in the hospital: Strategies and meanings. Journal of Health Service Research Policy. 2004; 9:218–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rehbein K., Schuler D.. Testing the firm as a filter of corporate political action. Business and Society. 1999; 38:144–166.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts R.. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting Organizations and Society. 1992; 17:595–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers E.. 1962. Diffusion of innovation. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford D.. Appraisal in action: A case study of innovation and leadership. Studies in Higher Education. 1992; 17:201–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senge P.M.. 1990. fifth discipline or the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday Currency.
   Google Scholar
• Suter E., Deutschlander S., Lait J.. Using a complex systems perspective to achieve sustainable practice change. Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education. 2011; 2 1: 83–99.
   Google Scholar
• Trist E., Bamforth K.. Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal getting. Human Relations. 1951; 4:3–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velde B., Greer A., Lynch D., Escott-Stump E.. Chaos theory as a planning tool for community-based educational experiences for health students. Journal of Allied Health. 2002; 31:147–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Von Bertalanffy L.. 1971. General systems theory. London: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Lubitz D., Wickramasinghe N.. Dynamic leadership in unstable and unpredictable environments. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development. 2006; 3:339–350.
   Google Scholar
• Wezel F., Saka-Helmhout A.. Antecedents and consequences of organizational change: “Institutionalizing” the behavioral theory of the firm. Organization Studies. 2006; 27:265–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcock P., Campion-Smith C., Head M.. The Dorset Seedcorn Project: Interprofessional learning and continuous quality improvement in primary care. British Journal of General Practice. 2002; 52:S39–S44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodall J.. Managing culture change: Can it ever be ethical?. Personnel Review. 1996; 25:26–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward J.. 1965. Industrial organization: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar