Exploring psychometric properties of the interdisciplinary education perception scale in health graduate students

References

• Bendix, R., & Lipset, S.M. (1953). Class, status, and power: A reader in social stratification (pp. 411–426). New York, NY: Free Press
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P.M. (1990). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Bronstein, L. (2003). A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Social Work, 48, 297--306. doi:10.1093/sw/48.3.297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M.W., & Cudek, R. (1993). Alternative ways of testing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Carmines, E.G., & McIver, J.P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables. In G.W. Bohrnstedt & E.F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 61–73). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. Available at: http://psych.colorado.edu/~carey/Courses/PSYC5112/Readings/alpha_Cronbach.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elston, S., & Holloway, E. (2001). The impact of recent primary care reforms in the UK on interprofessional working in primary care centres. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15, 19–27. doi:10.1080/13561820020022846
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans, J.L., Henderson, A., & Johnson, N. (2012). Interprofessional learning enhances knowledge of roles but is less able to shift attitudes: A case study from dental education. European Journal of Dental Education: Official Journal of The Association For Dental Education In Europe, 16, 239–245. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0579.2012.00749.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gusfield, J.R., & Schwartz, M. (1963). The meanings of occupational prestige: Reconsideration of the NORC scale. American Sociological Review, 28, 265–271. Available from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2090613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, A., Friberg, F., Segesten, K., Gedda, B., & Mattson, B. (2008). Two sides of the coin: General Practitioners’ experience of working in multidisciplinary teams. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22, 5–16. doi: 10.1080/13561820701722808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann, G.D., Schmitt, M.H., Farrell, M.P., & Brallier, S.A. (1999). Development of an attitudes toward health care teams scale. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 22, 123–122. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10350960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huck, S. (2012). Reading statistics and research. Boston, MA: Pearson
   Google Scholar
• Hulin, C., Cudeck, R., Netemeyer, R., Dillon, W.R., McDonald, R., & Bearden, W. (2001). Measurement. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10, 55–69. Available from http://users.ugent.be/~hgroenvy/scriptie/docs/55-69.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Luecht, R.M., Madsen, M.K., Taugher, M.P., & Petterson, B.J. (1990). Assessing professional perceptions: Design and validation of an interdisciplinary education perception scale. Journal of Allied Health, 19, 181–191. Available from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&AN=2365636&site=ehost-live
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacKay, S. (2004). The role perception questionnaire (RPQ): A tool for assessing undergraduate students' perceptions of the role of other professions. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 18, 289–302. doi: 10.1080/13561820410001731331
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matsueda, R.L. (2011). Key advances in the history of structural equation modeling. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 17--42). NewYork, NY: Guilford Press
   Google Scholar
• McFadyen, A.K., Maclaren, W.M., & Webster, V.S. (2007). The interdisciplinary education perception scale (IEPS): An alternative remodelled sub-scale structure and its reliability. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 21, 433–443. 10.1080/13561820701352531
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998–2011). Mplus user's guide (6th ed). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén
   Google Scholar
• Perloe, S.I. (1961). Status and the judgment of occupational prestige. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 671–674. doi: 10.1037/h0042664
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pullon, S. (2008). Competence, respect and trust: Key features of successful interprofessional nurse-doctor relationships. Journal of Interprofesssional Care, 22, 133–147. doi: 10.1080/13561820701795069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qualtrics (2005, 2009). Provo, UT: Qualtrics Labs, Inc
   Google Scholar
• Sireci, S.G. (1998). Validity theory and the methods used in validation: Perspectives from social behavioral sciences. Social Indicators Research, 45, 83–117. Available from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27522338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R., & Anderson, L. (2008). Interprofessional learning: Aspiration or achievement? Social Work Education, 27, 759–776. doi:10.1080/02615470701708636
   Google Scholar
• SPSS Inc. (2009). SPSS Base 8.0 for Windows User's Guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc
   Google Scholar
• Streiner, D.L., & Norman, G.R. (1996). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
   Google Scholar
• Thylefors, I. (2011). All professionals are equal but some professionals are more equal than others? Dominance, status and efficiency in Swedish interprofessional teams. Scandanavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 26, 505–512. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00955.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tucker, L.R., & Lewis, C. (1973). The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar