Implementing personalisation in integrated mental health teams in England

References

• Adult Social Care Statistics Team, Health and Social Care Information Centre. (2013). Measures from the adult social care outcomes framework, England: 2012–13, London. Retrieved from www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB13187/meas-from-asc-of-eng-1213-fin-rpt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, D., & Harris, M. (2009). The challenge of co-production. London: New Economics Foundation
   Google Scholar
• Breton, M. (1999). Sharing power. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 10, 33–51
   Google Scholar
• Clewett, N., Hamilton, S., Szymczynska, P., Manthorpe, J., Tew, J., Larsen, J., Pinfold, V. (2015). How can the benefits of personal budgets for people with mental illness be sustained after the payments stop? Research, Policy and Planning, 31, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (2007). Putting people first: A shared vision and commitment to the transformation of Adult Social Care. London: Department of Health
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (2009). Personal health budgets: First steps. London: Department of Health
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (2011). No health without mental health: A cross-government mental health outcomes strategy for people of all ages. London: Department of Health
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S., Huxley, P., Baker, C., White, J., Madge, S., Onyett, S. & Gould, N. (2012). The social care component of multidisciplinary mental health teams; a review and national survey. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 17, 23–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, A. & Reeves, S. (2014). Interprofessional collaborative patient-centred care: A critical exploration of two related discourses. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29, 113--118
   Google Scholar
• Freidson, E. (1970). Profession of medicine: A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. New York: Harper and Row
   Google Scholar
• Gannon, Z. & Lawson, N. (2008). Co-production: the modernisation of public services by staff and users. London: Compass
   Google Scholar
• Glasby, J. (2012). The controversies of choice and control: Why some people might be hostile to english social care reforms. British Journal of Social Work, 44, 252–266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (2005). Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19, 188–196
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunter, S., & Ritchie, P. (2007). With, not to: Models of co-production in social welfare. In S. Hunter & P. Ritchie (Eds.), Co-production and personalisation in social care: Changing relationships in the provision of social care (pp. 9--18). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers Limited
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, P. & Davis, H. (2004). Service design, culture and performance: Collusion and co-production in health care. Human Relations, 57, 1407–1426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P., Wistow, G., Schulz, R., & Hardy, B. (2003). Interagency and interprofessional collaboration in community care: The interdependence of structures and values. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 17, 70–83
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, S. & Cameron, A. (2014). Personalisation of adult social care: self-directed support and the choice and control agenda. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 264--271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, C., & Callaghan, P. (2005). Professionals' perceptions of interprofessional working in community mental health teams. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19, 338–346
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsen, J., Ainsworth, E., Harrop, C., Patterson, S., Hamilton, S., Szymczynska, P., … Pinfold, V. (2013). Implementing personalisation for people with mental health problems: a comparative case study of four local authorities in England. Journal of Mental Health, 22, 174–182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leece, J. & Leece, D. (2011). Personalisation: Perceptions of the role of social work in a world of brokers and budgets. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 204–223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manthorpe, J., & Moriarty, J. (2010). Nothing ventured, nothing gained. London: Department of Health (DH). Retrieved from http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/@ps/documents/digitalasset/dh_121493.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Manthorpe, J. & Samsi, K. (2013). ‘Inherently risky?’: Personal budgets for people with dementia and the risks of financial abuse: Findings from an interview-based study with adult safeguarding coordinators. British Journal of Social Work, 43, 889–903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNicholl, A. (2013). Councils split on integration of mental health social workers in NHS. Community Care. Retrieved from: http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/mental-health/2013/09/councils-split-on-full-integration-of-mental-health-social-workers-in-nhs/
   Google Scholar
• Musselwhite, K. Cuff, L., McGregor, L., & King, K. (2007). The telephone interview is an effective method of data collection in clinical nursing research: A discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44, 1064–1070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham, C. (2011). Personalization: From story-line to practice. Social Policy & Administration, 45, 54–68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham, C. & Carr, S. (2009). Co-production: An emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation. London: SCIE
   Google Scholar
• Peck, E., & Norman, I. J. (1999). Working together in adult community mental health services: exploring inter-professional role relations. Journal of Mental Health, 8, 231–243
   Google Scholar
• Powell, A. E., & Davies, H. T. (2012). The struggle to improve patient care in the face of professional boundaries. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 807–814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J. & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman (Ed.), Analysing qualitative data (pp. 173--194). London: Psychology Press
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. (2005). Community psychiatric nurses and the care co-ordinator role: squeezed to provide ‘limited nursing’. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52, 689–699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slasberg, C., Beresford, P., & Schofield, P. (2012). How self-directed support is failing to deliver personal budgets and personalisation. Research, Policy and Planning, 29, 161–177
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, N. (2008). Obstacles and dilemmas in the delivery of direct payments to service users with poor mental health. Practice, 20, 43–55
   Google Scholar
• Williams, V., Porter, S., & Marriott, A. (2014) Your life, your choice: Support planning led by Disabled People's Organisations. British Journal of Social Work, 44, 1197--1215. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct005
   Google Scholar