The role of health professionals in the UK child protection system: A literature review

References

• Allsop J. Health policy and the National Health Service. Longman, London 1984
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong H. Annual reports of child protection committees 1993/94. ACPC Series, London 1995, Report No. 1
   Google Scholar
• Audit Commission. Developing community care for adults with mental handicap. Occasional paper 9. HMSO, London 1986
   Google Scholar
• Audit Commission. Seen but not heard: co‐ordinating community child health and social services for children in need. Department of Health, London 1994
   Google Scholar
• Barker R. W. Child protection, public services and the chimera of market force efficiency. Children & Society 1996; 10: 28–39
   Google Scholar
• Beatite A. War and peace among the health tribes. Interprofessional relations in health care, K. Soothill, L. Mackay, W. C. Mackay. Edward Arnold, London 1995; 11–23
   Google Scholar
• Benson J. K. The interorganisational network as a political economy. Administrative Science Quarterly 1975; 24: 229–249
   Google Scholar
• Birchall E. Report to the Department of Health: working together in child protection: report of Phase Two: a suruey of the experience and perceptions of the key professions. University of Stirling, Stirling 1992
   Google Scholar
• Birchall E., Hunter C. Working together in child protection. Report phase two: a survey of the experience and perceptions of the six key professions. HMSO, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Bisset A. F., Hunter D. Child sexual abuse in general practice in north east Scotland. Edinburgh Health Bulletin 1992; 50(3)237–247
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blyth E., Miilner M. J. The process of interagency work. Taking child abuse seriously, Violence Against Children Study Group. Unwin Hyman, London 1990
   Google Scholar
• Bond J., Cartljdge A., Gregson B., Philips P., Bow F., Gill K. A study of interprofessional collaboration in primary health care organisations. University of Newcastle upon Tyne Health Care Research Unit, Newcastle 1985
   Google Scholar
• Booth T. A. Collaboration between the health and social services. Part 1: a case study of joint care planning. Policy and Politics 1981; 9(1)23–49
   Google Scholar
• Borne R., Newberger E. H. Interdisciplinary group process in the hospital management of child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse and Neglect 1980; 4: 137–144
   Google Scholar
• British Medical Journal. Editorial: an ethical debate. British Medical Journal 1996; 313: 671–673
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broussine M., Cox P., Davies F. The significance of interprofessional stereotyping in the health and social services. Local Government Studies 1988; 14(3)57–67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Challis L., Fuller S., Henwood M., Klein R., Plowden W., Webb A., Whittingham P., Wistow G. Joint approaches to social policy: rationality and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1988
   Google Scholar
• Chapman T., Hugman R., Williams A. Effectiveness of interprofessional relationships: a case illustration of joint working. Interprofessional relations in health care, K. Soothill, L. Mackay, C. Webb. Edward Arnold, London 1995; 46–61
   Google Scholar
• The report of the inquiry into the removal of children from Orkney in February 1991. HMSO, Edinburgh 1992, Clyde Report
   Google Scholar
• Cole R., Perides M. Managing values and organisational climate in a multiprofessional setting. Interprofessional relations in health care, K. Soothill, L. Mackay, C. Webb. Edward Arnold, London 1995; 62–74
   Google Scholar
• Corby B. Interprofessional cooperation and interagency coordination. The child protection handbook, K. Wilson, A. James. Bailliere Tindall, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Dartington. Child protection: messages from research. HMSO, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Day P., Klein R. Accountabilities: five public services. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987
   Google Scholar
• Department Of Health. Working together under the Children Act 19S—a guide to arrangements for inter‐agency co‐operation for the protection of children against abuse. HMSO, London 1991
   Google Scholar
• Department Of Health. Children's service plans: LAC(92) 18. HMSO, London 1992
   Google Scholar
• Department Of Health. Child protection: clarification of arrangements between the NHS and other agencies. Addendum to Working Together under the Children Act 1989. HMSO, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Department Of Health Aan Socw Security. Report of the committee of enquiry into the care and supervision provided in relation to Maria Colwell. HMSO, London 1974
   Google Scholar
• Department Of Health And Social Security. Non‐accidental injury to children. Area review committees. HMSO, London 1976, Lassl(76)2
   Google Scholar
• Department Of Health And Social Security. Child abuse: central register systems. HMSO, London 1980, Lassl(80)4
   Google Scholar
• Department Of Health And Social Security. Working Together. HMSO, London 1988
   Google Scholar
• Department Of Health And Social Service Inspectorate. Inspection of Cleveland Social Services department's arrangements for handling child sexual abuse. HMSO, London 1988
   Google Scholar
• Department Of Health And Social Service Inspectorate. Report of an inspection of collaborative working arrangements between child protection agencies in Cleveland. HMSO, London 1990a
   Google Scholar
• Department Of Health And Social Security Inspectorate. Inspection of child protection services in Rochdale. Dhssi, NW Region, Manchester 1990b
   Google Scholar
• Department Of Health And Social Security And Welsh Office. Working together: a guide to arrangements for interagency cooperation for the protection of children from abuse. HMSO, London 1988
   Google Scholar
• Donadson L. J., Cresswell P. A. The NHS reforms and child protection: where does accountability now rest?. Health and Social Care in the Community 1994; 2(4)255–257
   Google Scholar
• Doyal L. The political economy of health. Medical Anthropology Newsletter 1981; 13(1)17–18
   Google Scholar
• Duggan M. Primary health care: a prognosis. Institute for Public Policy Research, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Eaton L. Vital signs are poor. Community Care 1997; 17–23
   Google Scholar
• Farmer E., Owen M. Child protection practice: private risks and public remedies. A study of decision‐making, intervention and outcome in child protection work. HMSO, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Fox S., Dingwall R. An exploratory study of variations in social workers' and health visitors' definition of child mistreatment. British Journal of Social Work 1985; I5(5)467–478
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons J., Conroy S., Bell C. Operating the child protection system. A study of child protection practices in English local authorities. Studies in Child Protection. HMSO, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Gough D., Boddy F., Dunning N., Stone F. A longitudinal study of child abuse in Glasgow. Volume 1: The Children who were registered. University of Glasgow Social Paediatric and Obstetric Research Unit, Glasgow 1987
   Google Scholar
• Hall A., Harris R. J. The development of a multidisciplinary approach to the assessment and management of child sex abuse in an inner city health district. Health Trends 1988; 20: 39–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallet C. Interagency co‐ordination in child protection. Studies in Child Protection. HMSO, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Hallett C., Birchall E. Co‐ordination and child protection: a review of the literature. HMSO, Edinburgh 1995
   Google Scholar
• Hallet C., Stevenson O. Child abuse: aspects of interprofessional co‐operation. HMSO, London 1980
   Google Scholar
• Hayden C. Has a quasi‐market in education helped to create the unmarketable child?. The 6th Quasi‐Market Research Seminar. April, 10–11th. University of Portsmouth School of Social and Historical Studies, 1997
   Google Scholar
• Health Committee. Priority setting in the NHS: purchasing. House of Commons, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Hearn J. Notes on patriarchy, professionalisation and the semi‐professions. Sociology 1982; 16(2)184–202
   Google Scholar
• Hearn J. Progress towards the abolition of corporal punishment. Forum for the Discussion of New Trends in Education 1985; 27(2)54–56
   Google Scholar
• HMSO. National Health Service Reorganisation: England. HMSO, London 1972, Cmnd. 5055
   Google Scholar
• HOME Office, Department Of Ziealth, Department OF Education And Science Welsh Office. Working together under the Children Act: a guide to arrangements for interagency co‐operation for the protection of children fiom abuse. HMSO, London 1991
   Google Scholar
• Hoyte P. Protecting the paediatrician: responding to recrimination. Child Abuse Review 1996; 5(2)103–112
   Google Scholar
• Hudson B. Caring sharing. Community Care 1997; 2–3
   Google Scholar
• Hudson B. Quasi‐markets in health and social care in Britain: can the public sector respond?. Policy and Politics 1992; 20(2)131–142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson B. General practice and community care: developing the links. Health and Social Care in the Community 1994; 2(5)309–321
   Google Scholar
• Hugman R. Contested territories and community services: interprofessional boundaries in health and social care. Interprofessional relations in health care, K. Soothill, L. Mackay, C. Webb. Edward Arnold, London 1995; 31–45
   Google Scholar
• Hunter D., Wistow G. Community care in Britain. Sociology of Health and Illness 1987; 10(3)311–313
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick K. Nurses and doctors: a problem of partnership. Interprofessional relations in health care, K. Soothill, L. Mackay, C. Webb. Edward Arnold, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Lea‐Cox C., Hall A. Attendance of general practitioners at child protection case conferences. British Medical Journal 1991; 302: 1378–1379
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leedham I., Wistow G. Community care and general practitioners. Nuffield Institute, Leeds 1992, Working paper number 6
   Google Scholar
• Lewis J. Community care: policy imperatives, joint planning and enabling authorities. Journal of Interprofessional Care 1993; 7(1)7–14
   Google Scholar
• London Borough Of Bexley. Report of the panel of enquiry into the death of Luck Gates. Borough of Bexley and Bexley Health Authority, London 1982
   Google Scholar
• London Borough Of Brent. A child in trust: the report of the panel of enquiry into the circumstances regarding the death of Jasmine Beckford. Borough of Brent, London 1985
   Google Scholar
• London Borough OF Greenwich. A child in mind, the protection of children in a responsible society. Borough of Greenwich, London 1987
   Google Scholar
• McMurray J. Case Conferences ABC of Child Abuse. 1989, R. Meadow. British Medical Association, London
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. Community Care Development. HMSO, London 1987, Report to the Auditor General
   Google Scholar
• National Commission Of The Inquiry Into The Prevention Of Child Asuse Chairman, Lorn Wiluams Ofmoystyn. Childhood matters. Report of the National Commission of the Inquiry into the Prevention of Child Abuse. Volume 1. The Report. The Stationery Office, London 1996
   Google Scholar
• Orkney Inquiry. Report of the inquiry into the removal of children from Orkney in February 1991. HMSO, London 1991
   Google Scholar
• Parton N. Neglect as child protection: the political context and the practical outcomes. Children & Society 1995; 9(1)67–89
   Google Scholar
• Sadlar C. Is working together falling apart?. Health Visitor 1994; 67(8)259–260
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sargeant T. Joint care planning in the health and social services. Planning for Welfare, T. Booth. Blackwell and Martin Robinson, Oxford 1979
   Google Scholar
• Secretary Of State For Social Services. Report of the Inquiry into child abuse in Cleveland. HMSO, London 1988, Cmnd 112
   Google Scholar
• Seebohm F. Report of the committee on local authority and allied personal social services. HMSO, London 1968
   Google Scholar
• Simpson C. H., Simpson R. J., Power K. G., Salter A., Williams G. ‐J. GPs' and health visitors' participation in child protection case conferences. Child Abuse Review 1994; 3: 211–230
   Google Scholar
• Interprofessional relations in health care, K. Soothill, L. Macmy, C. Webb. Edward Arnold, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson O. Multidisciplinary work—where next?. Child Abuse Review 1988; 2(1)5–9
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson O. Multi‐disciplinary work in child protection. Child abuse: public policy and professional practice, O. Stevenson. Harvester Wheatsheaf, London 1989
   Google Scholar
• Stoker G. The politics of local government. Macmillan, London 1991
   Google Scholar
• Suiton P. Crossing the boundaries: a discussion of children's services' plans. National Children's Bureau, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Taylor S., Tilley N. Health visitors and child protection: conflict, contradictions and ethical dilemmas. Health Visitor 1989; 62(9)273–275
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor S., Tilley N. Inter‐agency conflict in child abuse work—reducing tensions between social workers and health visitors. Adoption & Fostering 1990; 14(4)13–17
   Google Scholar
• Toon P. D. Justice for gatekeepers. The Lancet 1994; 343(8897)585
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tunstill J., Gate J., Wilson M., Sutton P. Crossing the organisational divide: family support services. Health and Social Care in the Community 1996; 4(1)41–49
   Google Scholar
• Utting W. Children in the public care: a review of residential cure. HMSO, London 1991, [for] Social Services Inspectorate
   Google Scholar
• Warner R. Improving input to case conferences. Nursing Standard 1993; 7(22)33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warren U. Comprehensive planning and coordination—some functional aspects. Social Problems 1973; 20: 355–364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watton M. Regulation in child protection—policy failure?. British Journal of Social Work 1993; 23: 139–156
   Google Scholar
• Weiss J. Substance vs symbol in administrative reform: the case of human services co‐ordination. Policy Analysis 1981; 7(1)21–45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wheeler J., Daniel P. Social work and local politics. Macmillan, Basingstoke 1989
   Google Scholar
• Williams A. Ethics, clinical freedom and the doctor's role. Competition in health care. Reforming the NHS, A. J. Culyer, A. K. Maynard, J. W. Posnett. Macmillan Press, London 1990
   Google Scholar
• Wistow G. Collaboration between health and local authorities: why is it necessary?. Journal of Social Policy and Administration 1982; 16(1)44–62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt G. P. Child sexual abuse and limits of responsibility. The Lancet 1991; 337: 1166
   Google Scholar