Why don't teenagers use contraception? A qualitative interview study

References

• Social Exclusion Unit. Teenage pregnancy. London: Stationery Office, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills. Teenage pregnancy next steps: Guidance for local authorities and primary care trusts on effective delivery of local strategies. London: Stationery Office, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills. Teenage pregnancy: Accelerating the strategy to 2010. London: Stationery Office, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. Under 18 pregnancy data for Top Tier Local Authorities. London: Stationery Office, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kingston-upon-Hull City Council. Hull Trends. Accessed 3 February 2010 from: http://www.hullcc.gov.uk/portal/page?_pageid=221,134386&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL
   Google Scholar
• Buston K, Wight D. The salience and utility of school sex education to young women. Sex Educ 2002;2:233–250.
   Google Scholar
• Buston K, Wight D, Hart G. Inside the sex education classroom: The importance of context in engaging pupils. Cult Health Sex 2002;4:317–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buston K, Wight D. Pupils' participation in sex education lessons: Understanding variation across classes. Sex Educ 2004;4:285–301.
   Google Scholar
• Black C, McGough P, Bigrigg A, Thow C. What do clients of a young people's sexual health service recall about their sex education programme at school? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2005;10:235–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest S, Strange V, Oakley A, et al What do young people want from sex education? The results of a needs assessment from a peer-led sex education. Cult Health Sex 2004;6:337–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange V, Forrest S, Oakley A, et al Sex and relationship education for 13-16 year olds: evidence from England. Sex Educ 2006;6:31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Stone N, Ingham R. When and why do young people in the united Kingdom first use sexual health services? Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2003;35:114–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dei M, Bruni P, Bettini R, et al The resistance to contraceptive use in young Italian women. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2004;9:214–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson M, Tyden T, Hanson U, et al Contraceptive use and associated factors amongt Swedish high school students. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2007; 12:119–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez MA, Sola A, Cortes MJ, et al Sexual behaviour and contraception in people under the age of 20 in Alicante, Spain. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2007;12:125–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suvivo P, Tossavainen K, Kontula O. Contraceptive use and non-use among teenage girls in a sexually motivated situation. Sex Education 2009;9:355–369.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley N. Thrills and spills: Young people's sexual behaviour and attitudes in seaside and rural areas. Health Risk Soc 2008;7:337–348.
   Google Scholar
• Craig G, Stanley N. Visibility, immobility and stigma: Young people's use of sexual health services in rural areas. Child Soc 2008;20:171–182.
   Google Scholar
• Hooke A, Capewell S, Whyte M. Gender differences in Ayrshire teenagers' attitudes to sexual relationships, responsibility and unintended pregnancies. J Adolesc 2000;23:477–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Counterpoint Research. Young people's perceptions of contraception and seeking contraceptive advice, CPR 788. London: Counterpoint, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier L, Harrison L, Warr D. When you carry condoms all the boys think you want it: Negotiating competing discourses about safe sex. J Adolesc 1998;21:15–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood M. Lust, trust and latex: why heterosexual men do not use condoms. Cult Health Sex 2003;5:353–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• East L, Jackson D, O'Brien L, et al Use of the male condom by heterosexual adolescents and young people: Literature review. J Adv Nurs 2007;59;103–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell J. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. 2nd edn.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss S, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Green J. Commentary: Grounded theory and the constant comparative method. BMJ 1998;316:1064–1065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Discovering chronic illness: using grounded theory. Soc Sci Med 1990;30:1161–1172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ 2000;320:114–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman L, Ingham R. Attenders at young people's clinics in Southampton: Variations in contraceptive use. Br J Fam Plann 1998;24:101–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stone N, Ingham R. Factors affecting British teenagers' contraceptive use at first intercourse: The importance of partner communication. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2002;34:191–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkes A, Wight D, Henderson M. Teenagers' use of sexual health services: perceived need, knowledge and ability to access. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2004;30:217–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buston K, Williamson L, Hart G. Young women under 16 years with experience of sexual intercourse: who becomes pregnant? J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61:221–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar