What influences young women to choose between the emergency contraceptive pill and an intrauterine device? A qualitative study

References

• Levonelle® 1500 microgram tablet, PL05276/0019, Medimpex UK Limited. Accessed 10 October 2010 from: http://www.medicines.org.uk/EMC/medicine/16887/SPC/Levonelle+1500+microgram+tablet/
   Google Scholar
• Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2008, produced by the Office for National Statistics on behalf of the Department of Health, London: Office for National Statistics2010. Accessed 8 December 2010 from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_116336.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Raymond EG, Trussell J, Polis C. Population effect of increased access to emergency contraceptive pills: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:181–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polis CB, Schaffer K, Blanchard K, et al. Advance provision of emergency contraception for pregnancy prevention. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD005497. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005497.pub2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng CX, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Stephansson O, et al. Emergency contraceptive use among 5677 women seeking abortion in Shanghai, China. Hum Reprod 2009;24:1612–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faculty of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care Clinical Effectiveness Unit. FFPRHC Guidance. Emergency contraception. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2006;32:121–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Gulmezoglu AM, Piaggio G, et al. Interventions for emergency contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008:CD001324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Godfrey EM, Wojdyla D, et al. Copper T380A intrauterine device for emergency contraception: A prospective, multicentre, cohort clinical trial. BJOG 2010;117:1205–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Long-acting reversible contraception: The effective and appropriate use of long-acting reversible contraceptionLondon, UKRCOG Press2005. Accessed 26 March 2006 from: http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/CG030fullguideline.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lippes J, Malik T, Tatum HJ. The postcoital copper-T. Adv Plann Parenth 1976;11:24–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lader D. Contraception and sexual heath Opinions Survey Report No. 41, produced by the Office for National Statistics on behalf of the Department of Health, LondonOffice for National Statistics2008/09.
   Google Scholar
• Asker C, Stokes-Lampard H, Beavan J, Wilson S. What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non-users: A qualitative study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2006;32:89–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker AK, Johnson LM, Harwood B, et al. Adolescent and young adult women's knowledge of and attitudes toward the intrauterine device. Contraception 2008;78:211–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zijl S, Morroni C, van der Spuy ZM. A survey to assess knowledge and acceptability of the intrauterine device in the Family Planning Services in Cape Town, South Africa. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2010;36:73–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard B. Endometrial morphological changes in IUD users: A review. Contraception 1987;36:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss E, Reynolds T, Kundu A. Emergency contraception: Patterns of use in community sexual health clinics. J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;29:337–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bannister L, Macve J, Pinkey B, Webberley H. Is the faculty of family planning and reproductive health care guidance on emergency contraception being followed in general practice? An audit in the West Midlands, UK. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2007;33:195–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Cheng L. Awareness and usage of emergency contraception among teenagers seeking abortion: A Shanghai survey. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;141:143–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallon D. Accessing emergency contraception: The role of friends in the adolescent experience. Sociol Health Illn 2010;32:677–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenk KD. Emergency contraception: Lessons learned from the UK. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2003;29:35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown S, Guthrie K. Why don't teenagers use contraception? A qualitative interview study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2010;15:197–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastianelli C, Farris M, Benagiano G. Reasons for requesting emergency contraception: A survey of 506 Italian women. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2005;10:157–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanek AM, Bednarek PH, Nichols MD, et al. Barriers associated with the failure to return for intrauterine device insertion following first-trimester abortion. Contraception 2009;79:216–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasier AF, Cameron ST, Fine PM, et al. Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: A randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis. Lancet 2010;375:555–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar