Misinformation on abortion

REFERENCES

• Rowlands S. Abortion law of each nation state. 2010. Accessed 5 March, 2011, from: http://www.fiapac.org/media/ABORTION%20LAW%20OF%20EACH%20NATION%20STATE%20Sam%20Rowlands%20May%202010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgh G, Henshaw S, Singh S, . Induced abortion: Estimated rates and trends worldwide. Lancet 2007;370: 1338–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw D. Abortion and human rights. Best Practice Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2010;24:633–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook RJ, Dickens BM, Fathalla MF. Reproductive health and human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Sifris R. Restrictive regulation of abortion and the right to health. Med Law Rev 2010;18:185–212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reardon DC, Strahan TW, Thorp JM Jr, Shuping MW. Deaths associated with abortion compared to childbirth – A review of new and old data and the medical and legal implications. J Contemp Health Law Policy 2004; 20: 279–327.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gissler M, Berg C, Bouvier-Colle MH, Buekens P. Pregnancy-associated mortality after birth, spontaneous abortion, or induced abortion in Finland, 1987–2000. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:422–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Classification of Diseases and related health problems. 10th revision. Geneva: World Health Organization 1992. Accessed 5 March, 2011, from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/ICD-10_2nd_ed_volume2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Berg C, Danel I, Atrash H, . Strategies to reduce pregnancy-related deaths: From identification and review to action. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention> 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Ronsmans C, Khlat M, Kodio B, . Evidence for a “healthy pregnant woman effect” in Niakhar, Senegal? Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:467–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner LA, Kramer MS, Liu S. Maternal Mortality and Morbidity Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System: Cause-specific mortality during and after pregnancy and the definition of maternal death. Chronic Dis Can 2002;23:31–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gissler M, Berg C, Bouvier-Colle MH, Buekens P. Injury deaths, suicides and homicides associated with pregnancy, Finland 1987–2000. Eur J Public Health 2005;15:459–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saving mothers’ lives: 2003–2005. London: Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health 2007. Accessed 5 March, 2011, from: www.cmace.org.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Brind J. The abortion-breast cancer connection. Issues Law Med 2005;21:109–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D, . Levels of evidence. Oxford: Centre for Evidence-based Medicine 2009. Accessed 5 March, 2011, from: www.cebm.net.
   Google Scholar
• Wingo P, Newsome K, Marks J, . The risk of breast cancer following spontaneous or induced abortion [published erratum appears in Cancer Causes Control 1997;8:260]. Cancer Causes Control 1997;8:93–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brind J, Chinchilli VM, Severs WB, Summy-Long J. Induced abortion as an independent risk factor for breast cancer: Comprehensive review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health 1996;50:481–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collaborative group on hormonal factors in breast cancer. Breast cancer and abortion: Collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83 000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries. Lancet 2004;363:1007–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlin S. Recall bias in epidemiologic studies. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:87–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindefors-Harris BM, Eklund G, Adami HO, Meirik O. Response bias in a case-control study: Analysis utilizing comparative data concerning legal abortions from two independent Swedish studies. Am J Epidemiol 1991;134: 1003–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udry JR, Gaughan M, Schwingl PJ, van den Berg BJ. A medical record linkage analysis of abortion underreporting. Fam Plann Perspect 1996;28:228–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rowlands S. Memorandum 25. Science and Technology Committee. Scientific developments relating to the Abortion Act 1967 Volume II. HC 1045-II. London: The Stationery Office 2007. Ev 128-Ev 133.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. Summary report: Early reproductive events and breast cancer workshop. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Cancer 2003.
   Google Scholar
• RCOG. The care of women requesting induced abortion: Evidence-based Guideline No. 7, 2nd. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 2004. Accessed 5 March, 2011, from: www.rcog.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. Scientific developments relating to the Abortion Act 1967 Volume I. HC 1045-1. London: The Stationery Office 2007. Accessed 5 March, 2011, from: www.publications.parliament.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Speckhard A, Rue V. Postabortion syndrome: An emerging public health concern. J Soc Issues 1992;48: 95–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Dadlez EM, Andrews WL. Post-abortion syndrome: Creating an affliction. Bioethics 2010;24:445–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H¨¨k K. Refused abortion. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1963; 39 (Suppl. 168):1–156.
   Google Scholar
• Pare CMB, Raven H. Follow-up of patients referred for termination of pregnancy. Lancet 1970;1:635–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCance C, Olley PC, Edward V. Long-term psychiatric follow-up. Horobin G. Experience with abortion: A case study of North-East Scotland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1973:245–300.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg JR, Finer LB. Examining the association of abortion history and current mental health: A reanalysis of the National Comorbidity Survey using a common-risk-factors approach. Soc Sci Med 2011;72:72–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munk-Olsen T, Laursen TM, Pedersen CB, . Induced first-trimester abortion and risk of mental disorder. New Engl J Med 2011;364:332–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APA Task Force. Mental health and abortion. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Charles VE, Polis CB, Sridhara SK, Blum RW. Abortion and long-term mental health outcomes: A systematic review of the evidence. Contraception 2008;78:436–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major B, Appelbaum M, Beckman L, . Abortion and mental health: Evaluating the evidence. Am Psychol 2009;64:863–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowery CL, Hardman MP, Manning N, . Neuro-developmental changes of fetal pain. Semin Perinatol 2007;31:275–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Working Party. Fetal awareness: Review of research and recommendations for practice. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 2010. Accessed 5 March, 2011, from: www.rcog.org.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SJ, Ralston HJP, Drey EA, . Fetal pain: A systematic multidisciplinary review of the evidence. JAMA 2005;294:947–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous. State policies in brief: Counseling and waiting periods for abortion. New York: Guttmacher Institute 2010. Accessed 5 March, 2011, from: www.guttmacher.org.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger AA. Fetal pain legislation. J Leg Med 2006;27: 459–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisis pregnancy centers: An affront to choice. Washington DC: National Abortion Federation 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett LA, Berg CJ, Shulman HB, . Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:729–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes DA. Risks of mifepristone abortion in context. Contraception 2005;71:161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraiya M, Green CA, Berg CJ, . Spontaneous abortion-related deaths among women in the United States –1981–1991. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:172–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes DA. Estimation of pregnancy-related mortality risk by pregnancy outcome, United States, 1991 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:92–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves GK, Kan S-W, Key T, . Breast cancer risk in relation to abortion: Results from the EPIC study. Int J Cancer 2006;119:1741–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels KB, Xue F, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Induced and spontaneous abortion and incidence of breast cancer among young women: A prospective cohort study. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:814–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson KD, Sullivan-Halley J, Reynolds P, . Incomplete pregnancy is not associated with breast cancer risk: The California Teachers Study. Contraception 2008;77:391–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization Task Force. Secondary infertility following induced abortion. Stud Fam Plann 1984;15:291–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie IZ, Fry A. A prospective self-controlled study of fertility after second-trimester prostaglandin-induced abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158: 1137–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank P, McNamee R, Hannaford PC, . The effect of induced abortion on subsequent fertility. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:575–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daling JR, Weiss NS, Voigt L, . Tubal infertility in relation to prior induced abortion. Fertil Steril 1985;43: 389–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzonou A, Hsieh CC, Trichopolous D, . Induced abortions, miscarriages, and tobacco smoking as risk factors for secondary infertility. J Epidemiol Community Health 1993;47:36–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minh PN, Vinh NQ, Tuong HM, . A case-control study on the relationship between induced abortion and secondary tubal infertility in Vietnam. Fukushima J Med Sci 2002;48:15–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torres-Sánchez L, López-Carrillo L, Espinoza H, Langer A. Is induced abortion a contributing factor to tubal infertility in Mexico? Evidence from a case-control study. BJOG 2004;111:1254–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar