Effects of modernisation and new population policies on reproductive health in Kars, Turkey

references

• Open database: Census of population 2010 [Database on the internet]. Turkish Statistical Institute. Accessed 10 March 2011 from: http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/Start.do;jsessionid = p1hyNSXLQSpQCvYxDNjdhs5gY4pljY1lZtHWGGNvVmFh18skmkXJ!-1875654405
   Google Scholar
• Özvarş ŞB. Doğurganl g n Düzenlenmesi. In: UNFPA-I nsan Kaynağını Gelis tirme Vakfı, eds. Aile Planlamas nda Temel Bilgiler [Basics of family planning]. İstanbul: Damla Matbaacılık 2002:5 - 15. [In Turkish]
   Google Scholar
• Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. Turkey Demographic and Health Survey, 2003. Ankara: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Ministry of Health General Directorate of Mother and Child Health and Family Planning, State Planning Organisation and European Union 2004. Accessed 1 September 2010 from: http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/tnsa2003/anaraporenglish.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. Turkey Demographic and Health Survey, 2008. Ankara: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Ministry of Health General Directorate of Mother and Child Health and Family Planning, State Planning Organisation and Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey 2009. Accessed 1 September 2010 from: http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/tnsa2008/data/TNSA-2008_ana_Rapor-tr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Census of population 1990. Social and economic characteristics of population. Province: 36 Kars. Ankara: State Institute of Statistics, printing division 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Census of population 2000. Social and economic characteristics of population. Province: 36 Kars. Ankara: State Institute of Statistics, printing division 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Çallı Ş. Nüfus ve nüfus sorunlar. In: UNFPA-I nsan Kaynağ n Geliştirme Vakf , eds. Aile Planlamas nda Temel Bilgiler [Basics of family planning]. İstanbul: Damla Matbaacılık 2002:17–25. [In Turkish]
   Google Scholar
• Bölgesel göstergeler [Regional indices] Aǧrı, Kars, Iğdır, Ardahan 2009. Turkish Statistical Institute. Ankara: State Institute of Statistics, printing division 2010. [In Turkish]
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers JL, Kohler HP, McGue M, . Education and cognitive ability as direct, mediating, or spurious influences on female age at first birth: behavior genetic models fit to Danish twin data. Am J Sociol 2008;114(Suppl.): S202–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rindfuss RF, Hirschman C. The timing of family formation: structural and societal factors in the Asian context. J Marriage Fam 1984;46:205–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkie JR. The trend toward delayed parenthood. J Marriage Fam 1981;43:583–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam MN, Ahmed AU. Age at first marriage and its determinants in Bangladesh. Asia Pac Popul J 1998;13:73–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) -Births: Preliminary data for 2005. Accessed 10 April 2010 from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/prelimbirths05/prelimbirths05.htm
   Google Scholar
• Coskun A, Kotsu B, Ercan O, . Kahramanmaraş il merkezinde 2004 ve 2006 yıllarındaki dogǧumların karşılaştırılması [Comparison of births between 2004 and 2006 in Kahramanmaraş city centre]. J Turkish Obstet Gynaecol Soc 2007;4:168–72. [In Turkish]
   Google Scholar
• Meikle SF, Steiner CA, Zhang J, Lawrence WL. A national estimate of the elective primary cesarean birth rate. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:751–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin HC, Xirasagar S. Institutional factors in cesarean birth rates: policy and research implications. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:128–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özkaya O. Birth rates and cesarean indications at Süleyman Demirel University Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic through a 5-year period. SDÜ Tip Fak Derg 2005;12:36–9.
   Google Scholar
• Güney M, Uzun E, Oral B, et al. Caesarean section rates and indications at our clinic between 2001 and 2005. J Turkish Obstet Gynaecol Soc 2006;3:249–54. [In Turkish]
   Google Scholar
• Yaşar O, Sahin FK, Cosar E, . Birth method choices of primiparous women and the factors which have an effect on these choices. Türkiye Klinikleri J Gynecol Obstet (Same comment.) 2007;17:414–20. [In Turkish]
   Google Scholar
• Farrell SA, Basket TF, Farrell KD. The choice of elective cesarean birth in obstetrics: a voluntary survey of Canadian health care professionals. Int Urogynecol J 2005; 16:378–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz HP. Elective cesarean section – the right choice for whom? Curr Womens Health Rev 2005;1:85–8.
   Google Scholar
• Aile yapısı araştırması. [Family structure survey] Ankara: Turkish Republic General Directorate of Family and Social Research. 2006. [In Turkish]. Accessed 1 September 2010 from: http://www.aile.gov.tr/files/AileYapısı%202006%20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Frost J, Darroch J. Contraceptive use and unintended pregnancy. Glob Libr Womens Med (ISSN: 1756-2228) 2008; DOI 10.3843/GLOWM.10379. Accessed 1 September 2010 from: http://www.glowm.com/?p = glowm.cml/section_view&articleid = 378
   Google Scholar
• Rasch V, Gammeltoft T, Knudsen LB, et al. Induced abortion in Denmark: effect of socio-economic situation and country of birth. Eur J Public Health 2007;18: 144–9.
   Google Scholar
• Auger N, Giraud J, Daniel M. The joint influence of area income, income inequality, and immigrant density on adverse birth outcomes: a population-based study. BMC Public Health 2009;9:237.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bobak M, Dejmek J, Solansky I, et al. Unfavourable birth outcomes of the Roma women in the Czech Republic and the potential explanations: a population-based study. BMC Public Health 2005;5:106.
   Google Scholar
• Stoltenberg C, Magnus P, Lie RT, et al. Influence of consanguinity and maternal education on risk of stillbirth and infant death in Norway, 1967–1993. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148:452–9.
   Google Scholar
• Vehid S, Aran SN, Köksal S, . Silivri Bölgesi Kad nlar nda Menopoz ve Özellikleri. [Menopause and its characteristics in women living in the Silivri District]. Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2001;21:493–9. [In Turkish]
   Google Scholar
• Raleigh VS. Abortion rates in England in 1995: comparative study of data from district health authorities BMJ 1998;316:1711–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.C. Saǧlık Bakanlıǧı Ana Çocuk Saǧlıǧı ve Aile Planlaması Genel Müdürlüğü. Ulusal Aile Planlaması Hizmet Rehberi Cilt 1. Aile Planlaması ve Üreme Saǧlıǧı. [Turkish Republic Health Ministry Directorate of Maternity, Child Health and Family Planning. National Family Planning Services Guide Volume 1. Family Planning and Reproductive Health]. Ankara: Damla Matbaacılık, Reklamcılık ve Yayıncılık Tic.Ltd.Şt. 2005. [In Turkish]
   Google Scholar