Content analysis: A review of perceived barriers to sexual and reproductive health services by young people

REFERENCES

• UNFPA. Report of the International Conference on Population and Development – Cairo, 5–13 September 1994. New York: United Nations 1995: 1–193. Accessed on 5 September 2012 from: http://www.unfpa.org/public/site/global/publications/pid/1973
   Google Scholar
• International Planned Parenthood Federation [IPPF]. Vision 2000 and the ICPD Programme of Action. London: International Planned Parenthood Federation 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Fenton KA, Mercer CH, Johnson AM, et al. Reported sexually transmitted disease clinic attendance and sexually transmitted infections in Britain: Prevalence, risk factors, and proportionate population burden. J Infect Dis 2005;191:127–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French RS, Mercer CH, Kane R, et al. What impact has England's teenage pregnancy strategy had on young people's knowledge and access to contraceptive services? J Adolesc Health 2007;41:594–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambly S, Luzzi G. Sexual health services – A patient preference survey. Int J STD AIDS 2006;17:372–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasimova S. Family planning clinics. Milwaukee Alliance for Sexual Health 2006. Accessed 21 June 2011 from: http://city.milwaukee.gov/ImageLibrary/Groups/healthAuthors/MCH/PDFs/MASH/FamilyPlanningClinics063006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Senderowitz J. Making reproductive health services youth friendly. Washington, DC: FOCUS on Young Adults Program 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, et al. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005;10: 45–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandelowski M, Voils CI, Barroso J. Defining and designing mixed research synthesis studies. Res Sch 2006;13:29. Accessed 9 October 2012 from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc2809982/
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K. Content analysis, an introduction to its methodology, 3rd edn. London: Sage Publications 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2007;62:107–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15: 1277–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg C, Lewis-Spruill C, Crownover R. Barriers to sexual and reproductive health care: Urban male adolescents speak out. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs 2006;29:73–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donnelly C. Sexual health services: A study of young people's perceptions in Northern Ireland. Health Educ J 2000;59:288–96.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy DM, Fleming R, Swain C. Effect of mandatory parental notification on adolescent girls’ use of sexual health care services. JAMA 2002;14:710–4.
   Google Scholar
• DiCenso A, Borthwick VW, Busca CA, et al. Completing the picture: Adolescents talk about what's missing in sexual health services. Can J Public Health 2001;92:35–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram J, Salmon D. Young people's use and views of a school-based sexual health drop-in service in areas of high deprivation. Health Educ J 2010;69:227–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy EP, MacPhee C. Access to confidential sexual health services. Can Nurse 2006;102:29–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlisle J, Shickle D, Cork, M, et al. Concerns over confidentiality may deter adolescents from consulting their doctors. A qualitative exploration. J Med Ethics 2006; 32:133–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garside R, Ayres R, Owen M, et al. Anonymity and confidentiality: Rural teenagers’ concerns when accessing sexual health services. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2002;28:23–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas N, Murray E, Rogstad KE. Confidentiality is essential if young people are to access sexual health services. Int J STD AIDS 2006;17:525–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langille DB, Murphy GT, Hughes J, et al. Nova Scotia high school students’ interactions with physicians for sexual health information and services. Can J Public Health 2001;92:219–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson A, Williams R. Sexual health services: What do teenagers want? Ambul Child Health 2000;6:253–60.
   Google Scholar
• Stone N, Ingham R. When and why do young people in the United Kingdom first use sexual health services? Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2003;35:114–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burack R. Young teenagers'attitudes towards general practitioners and their provision of sexual health care. Br J Gen Pract 2000;50:550–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths C, Gerressu M, French RS. Are one-stop shops acceptable? Community perspectives on one-stop shop models of sexual health service provision in the UK. Sex Transm Infect 2008;84:395–9.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson S. Promoting sexual health services to young men: Findings from focus group discussions. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2003;29:194–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baraitser P, Blake G, Brown KC, et al. Barriers to the involvement of clients in family planning service development: Lessons learnt from experience. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2003;29:199–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans J, Cross J. Community sexually transmitted infection services are good enough: A qualitative study of clients’ experiences. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2007;33:259–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen J, Carroll C, Cooke J, et al. School-linked sexual health services for young people (SSHYP): A survey and systematic review concerning current models, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and research opportunities. Health Technol Assess 2010;14:1–255,iii–iv.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar