Advanced search
Publication Cover
The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care Volume 20, 2015 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
172
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Laparoscopic non-microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: A retrospective cohort study

Marije van de Water *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
,
Jan BosteelsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
,
Petra De Sutter *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
&
Steven Weyers *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, BelgiumCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 193-200 | Published online: 29 Dec 2014

REFERENCES

  • Wilcox LS, Chu SY, Eaker ED, et al. Risk factors for regret after tubal sterilization: 5 years of follow-up in a prospective study. Fertil Steril 1991;55:927–33.
  • Siegler AM, Hulka J, Peretz A. Reversibility of female sterilization. Fertil Steril 1985;43:499–510.
  • George K, Kamath MS, Tharyan P. Minimally invasive versus open surgery for reversal of tubal sterilization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;2:CD009174.
  • Barjot PJ, Marie G, Von Theobald P. Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis and reversal of sterilization. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1222–5.
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–13.
  • Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1520–4.
  • Gauwerky JF, Klose R. An experimental model for pelviscopic tubal anastomosis. Hum Reprod 1990;5:439–43.
  • Reich H, McGlynn F, Parente C, et al. Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1993;1:16–9.
  • Koh CH. Microsurgical laparoscopic tubal resection and anastomosis: technique and results. Références Gynécol Obstét 1995;Special issue:102–4.
  • Yoon TK, Sung HR, Cha SH, et al. Fertility outcome after laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis. Fertil Steril 1997;67:18–22.
  • Dubuisson JC, Chapron C. Single suture laparoscopic tubal re-anastomosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1998;10:307–13.
  • Bissonnette F, Lapensée L, Bouzayen R. Outpatient laparoscopic tubal anastomosis and subsequent fertility. Fertil Steril 1999;72:549–52.
  • Yoon TK, Sung HR, Kang HG, et al. Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: fertility outcome in 202 cases. Fertil Steril 1999;72:1121–6.
  • Cha SH, Lee MH, Kim JH, et al. Fertility outcome after tubal anastomosis by laparoscopy and laparotomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2001;8:348–52.
  • Hawkins J, Dube D, Kaplow M, Tulandi T. Cost analysis of tubal anastomosis by laparoscopy and by laparotomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2002;9:120–4.
  • Goldberg JM, Falcone T. Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis with and without robotic assistance. Hum Reprod 2003;18:145–7.
  • Ribeiro SC, Tormena RA, Giribela CG, et al. Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2004;84:142–6.
  • Wiegerinck MA, Roukema M, van Kessel P, Mol BW. Sutureless re-anastomosis by laparoscopy versus microsurgical re-anastomosis by laparotomy for sterilization reversal: a matched cohort study. Hum Reprod 2005;20:2355–8.
  • Schepens JJ, Mol BW, Wiegerinck MH, et al. Pregnancy outcomes and prognostic factors from tubal sterilization reversal by sutureless laparoscopical re-anastomosis: a retrospective cohort study. Hum Reprod 2011;26:354–9.
  • Deffieux X, Morin Surroca M, Faivre E, et al. Tubal anastomosis after tubal sterilization: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011;283:1149–58.
  • Trimbos-Kemper TC. Reversal of sterilization in women over 40 years of age: a multicenter survey in the Netherlands. Fertil Steril 1990;53:575–7.
  • Jihui Ai, Pei Zhang, Lei Jin, et al. Fertility outcome analysis after modified laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis. Front Med 2011;5:310–4.
  • Tan HH, Loh SF. Microsurgical reversal of sterilization – is this still clinically relevant today? Ann Acad Med Singapore 2010;39:22–6.
  • Rodgers AK, Goldberg JM, Hammel JP, Falcone T. Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:1375–80.
  • Dharia Patel SP, Steinkampf MP, Whitten SJ, Malizia BA. Robotic tubal anastomosis: surgical technique and cost effectiveness. Fertil Steril 2008;90:1175–9.
  • Caillet M, Vandromme J, Rozenberg S, et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a retrospective study. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1844–7.
  • Boeckxstaens A, Devroey P, Collins J, Tournaye H. Getting pregnant after tubal sterilization: surgical reversal or IVF? Hum Reprod 2007;22:2660–4.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.