Evaluation of holistic sexuality education: A European expert group consensus agreement

References

• International Planned Parenthood Federation. IPPF framework for comprehensive sexuality education (CSE). London: IPPF 2006/2010.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. International technical guidance on sexuality education. An evidence-informed approach for schools, teachers and health educators. Paris: UNESCO 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung. Standards for sexuality education in Europe. A framework for policy makers, educational and health authorities and specialists. Cologne: BZgA 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung. Standards for sexuality education in Europe. Guidance for implementation. Cologne: BZgA 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Population Council. It's all one curriculum. Guidelines and activities for a unified approach to sexuality, gender, HIV, and human rights education. New York: Population Council 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Danielsson M, Rogala C, Sundström K. Teenage sexual and reproductive behavior in developed countries. Country report for Sweden. New York: The Guttmacher Institute 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Svendsen S. Elusive sex acts: Pleasure and politics in Norwegian sex education. Sex Educat 2012;12:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiefferink CH, Poelman J, Linthorst M, et al. Outcomes of a systematically designed strategy for the implementation of sex education in Dutch secondary schools. Health Educat Res 2005;20:323–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters K, Degryse B, Frans E, et al. Handboek relationele en seksuele vorming voor het secundair onderwijs. Antwerp: Garant 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Haldre K, Part K, Ketting E. Youth sexual health improvement in Estonia, 1990–2009: The role of sexuality education and youth-friendly services. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2012;17:351–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug-Schnabel G. Sexualität ist kein Tabu. Vom behutsamen Umgang mit einem schwierigem Thema. [Sexuality is no taboo. About carefully dealing with a difficult theme.] Freiburg: Herder 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Beier M, Bosinski H, Hartmann U, et al. Sexualmedizin. Grundlagen und Praxis. [Sexual medicine. Fundament and operation.] Munich: Jena: Urban & Fischer 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Future of sex education. History of sex education. Accessed on 24 June 2014 from: www.futureofsexed.org/background.html
   Google Scholar
• Ketting E, Winkelmann C. New approaches to sexuality education and underlying paradigms. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 2013;56:250–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathematica Policy Research. Impacts of four title V, section 510 abstinence education programs. Final report. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Collins C, Alagiri P, Summers T. Abstinence only vs. comprehensive sex education. What are the arguments? What is the evidence? San Francisco, CA: AIDS Research Institute, University of California 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby D, Laris BA, Rolleri LA. Sex and HIV education programs for youth: Their impact and important characteristics. Washington, DC: Family Health International 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Mellanby AR, Newcombe RG, Rees J, et al. A comparative study of peer-led and adult-led school sex education. Health Education Res 2001;16:481–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy C, Gabhainn SN. Moving from paper to practice. An examination of teachers’ implementation of relationships and sexuality education (RSE) in Irish post-primary schools. J Sex Med 2011;8:204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buston K, Wight D, Hart G, et al. Implementation of a teacher-delivered sex education programme: Obstacles and facilitating factors. Health Educat Res 2002;17:59–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayter M, Piercy H, Massey MT, et al. School nurses and sex education: Surveillance and disciplinary practices in primary schools. J Advan Nurs 2008;61:273–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourton V. Sex education in school: Young people's views. Paediatr Nurs 2006;18(8):20–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lisette S. Long live love. A collaborative implementation strategy for school-based sex education. Psychol Health 2011;26:274–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massar K. Eindrapportage evaluatie van de serious game ‘Can you fix it?’. Utrecht: Rutgers Nisso & WPF, Maastricht University 2011.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. Sexuality education review and assessment tool (SERAT). Paris: UNESCO 2013. Accessed 16 February 2014 from: http://hivhealthclearinghouse.unesco.org/library/documents/sexuality-education-review-and-assessment-tool-serat-0
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. Measuring the education sector response to HIV and AIDS. Guidelines for the construction and use of core indicators. Paris: UNESCO 2013.
   Google Scholar
• International Planned Parenthood Federation. Inside & out. Internal document: sexual education assessment tool. IPPF 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Carrera-Fernandez MV, Lameiras-Fernandez M, Foltz ML, et al. Evaluacion de un programa de educacion sexual con estudiantes de Educacion Secundaria Obligatoria. [Evaluation of an sexual educational programme for students of obligatory secondary education.] Int J Clin Health Psychol 2007;7:739–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomara I, Reparaz C, Osorio A, et al. Sex education in Spanish textbooks: Evaluation of an alternative textbook. Ese-Estudios Sobre Educacion 2010;:139–63.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff N. Using randomized controlled trials to evaluate socially complex services: problems, challenges and recommendations. J Mental Health Policy Econ 2000;3:97–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta GR, Parkhurst JO, Ogden JA, et al. Structural approaches to HIV prevention. Lancet 2008;372 (9640):764–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laga M, Rugg D, Peersman G, et al. Evaluating HIV prevention effectiveness: The perfect as the enemy of the good. AIDS 2012;26:779–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart-Brown S, Anthony R, Wilson L, et al. Should randomised controlled trials be the ‘gold standard’ for research on preventive interventions for children? J Child Services 2011;6(4).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonell C, Fletcher A, Morton M, et al. Realist randomised controlled trials: A new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions. Soc Sci Med 2012;75:2299–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivela J, Ketting E, Baltussen R. Cost analysis of school-based sexuality education programs in six countries. Cost effectiveness and resource allocation 2013;11:17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hornik R. Lessons learned from 30 years of research about the evaluation of public health communication campaigns. Colloque scientifique. Comment mésurer l’impact des campagnes de prévention. Paris: Institut national de prévention et d’éducation pour la santé 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes R, Kapiga S, Padian N, et al. HIV prevention research: Taking stock and the way forward. AIDS 2010;24(Suppl. 4):S81–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalmijn E, Cense M, Mari S. Gebruikers- & procesonderzoek: ‘Juf, doet u ook aan seks?’. Lespakket relationele en seksuele vorming voor de PABO [User and process evaluation: ‘Miss, do you also have sex?’. Package of lessons for teaching about relationships and sexuality.] Utrecht: Rutgers WPF 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Galambos NL, Almeida DM, Petersen AC. Masculinity, femininity, and sex-role attitudes in early adolescence: Exploring gender intensification. Child Dev 1990; 61:1905–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulerwitz J, Gortmaker SL, DeJong W. Measuring sexual relationship power in HIV/STD research. Sex Roles 2000;42:637–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl ML, Paz Galupo M. Development and validation of the attitudes toward same-sex marriage scale. J Homosex 2007;53:117–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avalos L, Tylka TL, Wood-Barcalow N. The body appreciation scale. Development and psychometric evaluation. Body Image 2005;2:285–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vickberg SMJ, Deaux K. Measuring the dimensions of women's sexuality. The women's sexual self-concept scale. Sex Roles 2005;53:361–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnell WE. The multidimensional sexual self-concept questionnaire 1998. Accessed 11 July 2014 from: www4.semo.edu/snell/scales/msscq_abs.doc
   Google Scholar
• Currie C, Zanoti C, Morgan A, et al., eds. Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) Study: International report from the 2009/2010 survey. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson RM. Positive sexuality and its impact on overall well-being. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheits forschung-Gesundheitsschutz 2013;56:208–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt CE, Mitchell N, Torgerson DJ. Listen to the data when results are not significant. BMJ (Clin Res Edn) 2008;5;336(7634):23–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson R, Tilley N. Realist evaluation. London: Sage 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Habicht JP, Victora CG, Vaughan JP. Evaluation designs for adequacy, plausibility and probability of public health programme performance and impact. Int J Epidem 1999;28:10–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apter D. Recent development and consequences of sexuality education in Finland. BZgA Forum Sex Educat Fam Plann 2011;2:3–8.
   Google Scholar