Long-acting reversible contraception: Findings from the Understanding Fertility Management in Contemporary Australia survey

REFERENCES

• Richters J, Grulich AE, de Visser RO, et al. Sex in Australia: Contraceptive practices among a representative sample of women. Aust N Z J Public Health 2003;27:210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read C, Bateson D, Wesiberg E, Estoesta J. Contraception and pregnancy then and now: Examining the experiences of a cohort of mid-age Australian women. Aust N Z J Public Health 2009;49:429–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr N, Siedlecky S. Use of ‘dual protection’ and other combinations of contraceptive methods in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2007;31:567–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray E, McDonald P. Using a reproductive life course approach to understand contraceptive method use in Australia. J Biosocial Sci 2010;42:43–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazza D, Harrison C, Taft A, et al. Current contraceptive management in Australian general practice: An analysis of BEACH data. Med J Aust 2012;197:110–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexual Health and Family Planning Australia. Time for a change: Increasing the use of long acting reversible contraceptive methods in Australia2013; Available from: www.fpv.org.au/assets/LARCstatementSHFPAFINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harvey C, Seib C, Lucke J. Continuation rates and reasons for removal among Implanon® users accessing two family planning clinics in Queensland, Australia. Contraception 2009;80:527–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Family Planning NSW. Reproductive and sexual health in Australia. Ashfield, Sydney, NSW: FPNSW, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use: 2008 update. Geneva: WHO 2008. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2008/WHO_RHR_08.19_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion no. 450: increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy. Obstetr Gynecol 2009; 114:1434–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Likis FE. A new year's resolution: Promoting long-acting reversible contraception. J Midwifery Women Health 2014;59:1–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peipert J, Zhao Q, Allsworth J, et al. Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception. Obstetr Gynecol 2011;117:1105–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Long-acting reversible contraception: The effective and appropriate use of long-acting reversible contraception. London: RCOG Press 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Eeckhaut MCW, Sweeney MM, Gipson JD. Who is using long-acting reversible contraceptive methods? Findings from nine low-fertility countries. Perspect Sexual Reproduct Health 2014;46:149–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization. Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Black KI, Bateson D, Harvey C. Australian women need increased access to long-acting reversible contraception. Med J Australia 2013;199:317–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Nurse-Midwives. Our moment of truth. 2013 survey of women's health care experiences and perceptions: Spotlight on family planning and contraception; executive summary. Silver Spring, MD: American College of Nurse-Midwives 2013
   Google Scholar
• Blumenthal PD, Voedisch A, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: Increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception. Human Reproduct Update 2011;17:121–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finer L, Jerman J, Kavanaugh M. Changes in use of long acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007–2009. Fertil Steril 2012;98:893–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanaugh M, Jerman J, Hubacher D, et al. Characteristics of women in the United States who use long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Obstetr Gynecol 2011; 117:1349–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forste R, Morgan J. How relationships of U.S. men affect contraceptive use and efforts to prevent sexually transmitted diseases. Family Plann Perspect 1998;30:56–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dempsey A, Billingsley C, Savage A, Korte JE. Predictors of long-acting reversible contraception use among unmarried young adults. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206(526):e1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asch D, Jedrziewski M, Christakis N. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:1129–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, et al. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: Systematic review. BMJ 2002;324:1183–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming C, Bowden M. Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods. J Environ Manage 2009;90:284–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler R, Little R, Groves R. Advances in strategies for minimizing and adjusting for survey nonresponse. Epidem Rev 1995;17:192–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2011 Census of Population and Housing. Canberra: ABS 2011. Accessed on 15 December 2014 from: www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/census?opendocument&navpos = 10
   Google Scholar
• Spies E, Askelson NM, Gelman E, Losch ME. Young women's knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to long-acting reversible contraceptives. Women Health Issues 2010;20:394–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanaugh ML, Lindberg LD, Frost JJ. Factors influencing partners’ involvement in women's contraceptive services. Contraception 2012;85:83–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldstone P, Mehta YH, McGeechan K, et al. Factors predicting uptake of long-acting reversible methods of contraception among women presenting for abortion. Med J Aust 2014;201:412–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. Health and socioeconomic advantage. Canberra: ABS 2010. Accessed on 22 December 2014 from: www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/Lookup/4102.0Main+ Features30Mar + 2010
   Google Scholar
• Cooper RJ, Bissell P, Wingfield J. Ethical, religious and factual beliefs about the supply of emergency hormonal contraception by UK community pharmacists. Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2008;34:47–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher C, Holton A, McDonald L, Gallagher P. The fox and the grapes: an Anglo-Irish perspective on conscientious objection to the supply of emergency hormonal contraception without prescription. J Med Ethics 2013;39:638–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo J, Miller E, Gold M. Myths and misconceptions about long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). J Adolesc Health 2013;52(4 Suppl.):S14–S21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracken J, Graham CA. Young women's attitudes towards, and experiences of, long-acting reversible contraceptives. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2014;19:276–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez AM, Fuentes L, Allina A. Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Perspect Sexual Reproduct Health 2014;46:171–5.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JA. Celebration meets caution: LARC's boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach. Contraception 2014;89:237–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2011 Census QuickStats. Canberra: ABS 2013. Available from: www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/quickstat/2?opendocument&navpos = 220
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australia based data for sex, basic community profile Table B01, for 2011 Census. Canberra: ABS 2014. Available from: http://stat.abs.gov.au/Index.aspx?DataSetCode = ABS_CENSUS2011_B01
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4364.0.55.002 – Australian Health Survey: health service usage and health related actions, 2011–12. Accessed September 2014 from: www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/Lookup/E334D0A98272E4DCCA257B39000F2DCF?opendocument
   Google Scholar