The objective assessment of surgical skill

References

• Poloniecki J, Valencia O, Littlejohns P. Cumulative risk adjusted mortality chart for detecting changes in death rate: observational study of heart surgery. Br Med J 1998; 316: 1697–700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan D. A., et al. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination. The new gold standard for evaluating postgraduate clinical performance. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 735–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastakis D J, et al. Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model. Am J Surg 1999; 177: 167–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenyon R V, Afenya M B. Training in virtual and real environments. Ann Biomed Eng 1995; 23: 445–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston R, Weiss P. Analysis of virtual reality technology applied in education. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1997; 6: 126–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torkington J, et al. Skill transfer from a virtual reality simulator to a real laparoscopic task. Surg Endosc., In press
   Google Scholar
• Bellenkes A H, Wickens C D, Kramer A F. Visual scanning and pilot expertise: the role of attentional flexibility and mental model development. Aviat Space Environ Med 1997; 68: 569–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznick R, et al. Testing technical skill via an innovative ‘bench station’ examination. Am J Surg 1997; 173: 226–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin J A, et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 273–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winckel C P, et al. Reliability and construct validity of a structured technical skills assessment form. Am J Surg 1994; 167: 423–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsky J L. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1991; 161: 393–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters J H, et al. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 1991; 110: 769–77, Discussion 777–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosser J C, Jr, Rosser L E, Savalgi R S. Objective evaluation of a laparoscopic surgical skill program for residents and senior surgeons [Comments]. Arch Surg 1998; 133: 657–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furka I, et al. The history and the future of teaching and training of laparoscopic surgery in Hungary. Acta Chir Hung 1999; 38: 159–61
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe B M, et al. Training for minimally invasive surgery. Need for surgical skills. Surg Endosc 1993; 7: 93–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasley D S, Seth S R, Yancey M K. Porcine laparoscopy training for gynecologists and general surgeons. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1995; 2((4, Suppl))S24
   Google Scholar
• Lima M, et al. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with fibrin glue: experimental study on pigs. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1997; 7: 4–7
   Google Scholar
• Ordonez J L, et al. The effect of training and duration of surgery on adhesion formation in the rabbit model. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 2654–7
   Google Scholar
• Mori T HN, Maruyama S, Atomi Y. Significance of ‘hands-on training’ in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 256–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taffinder N TJ, Smith S, Russell R, Darzi A. The effect of time pressure on surgical precision: a randomized study. Br J Surg 1999; 86(Suppl 1)76
   Google Scholar
• Rosser J C, Rosser L E, Savalgi R S. Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 1997; 132: 200–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna G B, Shimi S, Cuschieri A. Optimal port locations for endoscopic intracorporeal knotting. Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 397–401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna G B, Shimi S, Cuschieri A. Influence of direction of view, target-to-endoscope distance and manipulation angle on endoscopic knot tying. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1460–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanna G B, Shimi S M, Cuschieri A. Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus threedimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy [Comments]. Lancet 1998; 351: 248–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taffinder N, et al. The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 1087–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taffinder N, . Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery. Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 6. Technology and Informatics 50, J Westwood, H Hoffman, D Stredney, S Weghorst, et al. IOS Press, Amsterdam 1998; 124–30, 1998. Jan 28–31; San Diego, USA
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher A G, et al. Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary assessment of minimally invasive surgical trainer virtual reality (MIST VR) [In Process Citation]. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 310–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith S, Wan A, Taffinder N, . Early experience and validation work with Procedicus VA - The Prosolvia virtual reality shoulder arthroscopy trainer. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, J Westwood, H Hoffman, R Robb, D Stedney, et al. IOS Press, Amsterdam 1999
   Google Scholar
• Hanna G B, Drew T, Clinch P, et al. A microprocessorcontrolled psychomotor tester for minimal access surgery. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 965–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna G B, Drew T, Cuschieri A. Technology for psychomotor skills testing in endoscopic surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg 1997; 4: 120–4
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan Al, Cuschieri A. Assessment of innate ability and skills for endoscopic manipulations by the Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester: predictive and concurrent validity. Am J Surg 1999; 177: 274–7
   Google Scholar
• Taffinder N, Smith S, Mair J, et al. Can a computer measure surgical precision? Reliability, validity and feasibility of the ICSAD. Surg Endosc 1999; 13(Suppl 1)81
   Google Scholar
• Smith S, Torkington J, Darzi A. A computerised assessment of surgical dexterity during perfused cadaveric porcine laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1999; 86(Suppl 1)95
   Google Scholar
• Joice P, Hanna G B, Cuschieri A. Ergonomic evaluation of laparoscopic bowel suturing. Am J Surg 1998; 176: 373–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berguer R. Surgical technology and the ergonomics of laparoscopic instruments. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 458–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berguer R, et al. A comparison of forearm and thumb muscle electromyographic responses to the use of laparoscopic instruments with either a finger grasp or a palm grasp. Ergonomics 1999; 42: 1634–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna G B, Frank T G, Cuschieri A. Objective assessment of endoscopic knot quality. Am J Surg 1997; 174: 410–3
   Google Scholar