Design and fabrication of a novel tactile sensory system applicable in artificial palpation

References

• Dargahi J, Najarian S. Advances in Tactile Sensors Design/Manufacturing and Its Impact on Robotics Application, A review. Indus Robot. 2005;32:268–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tholey G, Desai JP, Castellanos AE. Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery: results and analysis. Ann Surg. 2005;241:102–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najarian S, Dargahi J, Zheng XZ. A Novel Method in Measuring the Stiffness of Sensed Objects with Applications for Biomedical Robotic Systems. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg. 2006;2:84–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shikida M, Shimizu T, Sato K, Itoigawa K. Active tactile sensor for detecting contact force and hardness of an object. Sens. Actuators, A 2003;103:213–8.
   Google Scholar
• Mack M. Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery. Opportunities for Medical Research 2001;285:568–72.
   Google Scholar
• Camarillo DB, Krummel TM, Salisbury Jr JK. Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg. 2004;188:2S–15S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakoli M, Aziminejad A, Patel RV, Moallem M. Methods and mechanisms for contact feedback in a robot-assisted minimally invasive environment. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1570–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirabassi MV, Wadie G, Tashjian DB, Moriarty KP. Improving tactile sensation in minimally invasive pediatric surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2007;17:501–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eltaib MEH, Hewit JR. Tactile sensing technology for minimal access surgery–a review. Mechatronics 2003;13:1163–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dargahi J, Najarian S, Ramezanifard R. Graphical display of tactile sensing data with application in minimally invasive surgery. Can J Electr Comput Eng. 2007;32:151–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westebring-van der Putten EP, Goossens RH, Jakimowicz JJ, Dankelman J. Haptics in minimally invasive surgery-a review. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008;17:3–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dario P. Tactile Sensing-Technology and Applications. Sens. Actuators, A 1991;26:251–61.
   Google Scholar
• Lee MH. Tactile Sensing: New Directions, New Challenges. The International J. of Robotics Research 2000;19:636–43.
   Google Scholar
• Dargahi J, Najarian S. Human tactile perception as a standard for artificial tactile sensing-a review. Int J Med Robot. 2004;1:23–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najarian S, Dargahi J, Abouei A. Artificial tactile sensing in biomedical engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009:105–22.
   Google Scholar
• Najarian S, Dargahi J, Mirjalili V. Detecting Embedded Objects using Haptics with Applications in Artificial Palpation of Tumors. Sensors & Materials 2006;18:215–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roham H, Najarian S, Hosseini SM, Dargahi J. Design and fabrication of a new tactile probe for measuring the modulus of elasticity of soft tissues. Sensor Rev. 2007;27:317–23.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakoli M, Patel RV, Moallem M. Haptic interaction in robot-assisted endoscopic surgery: a sensorized end-effector. Int J Med Robot Comp. 2005;1:53–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schostek S, Ho CN, Kalanovic D, Schurr MO. Artificial tactile sensing in minimally invasive surgery-a new technical approach. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2006;15:296–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini SM, Najarian S, Motaghinasab S, Dargahi J. Detection of tumors using a computational tactile sensing approach. Int J Med Robot Comp. 2006;2:333–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini SM, Najarian S, Motaghinasab S, Tavakoli Golpaygani A, Torabi S. Prediction of tumor existence in the virtual soft tissue by using tactile tumor detector. American Journal of Applied Sciences 2008;5:483–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini SM, Towliat Kashani SM, Najarian S, Panahi F, Mousavi Naeini SR, Mojra A. A medical tactile sensing instrument for detecting embedded objects, with specific application for breast examination. Int J Med Robot Comp. 2010;6:73–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velanovich V. Laparoscopic vs open surgery: a preliminary comparison of quality-of-life outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:16–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nadu A, Schatloff O, Morag R, Ramon J, Winkler H. Laparoscopic Surgery for Renal Stones: Is it Indicated in the Modern Endourology Era?. International Braz J Urol. 2009;35:9–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ottermo MV, Ovstedal M, Langø T, Stavdahl O, Yavuz Y, Johansen TA, The role of tactile feedback in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006;16:390–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schostek S, Schurr MO, Buess GF. Review on aspects of artificial tactile feedback in laparoscopic surgery. Med Eng Phys. 2009;31:887–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett B. Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008: 650–660.
   Google Scholar
• American Cancer Society. 2007. Cancer Facts and Figures 2007, No. 500807. Atlanta, GA. American Cancer Society Inc. www.cancer.org.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng J, Wang Y, Freedman MT, Mum SK. Finger tracking for breast palpation quantification using color image features. SPIE J Opt Eng. 1997;36:3455–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barman I, Guha SK. Analysis of a New Combined Stretch and Pressure Sensor for Internal Nodule palpation. Sens. Actuators, A 2006;125:210–6.
   Google Scholar