179
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical reports

Comparison of the ultrasonic scalpel to CO2 laser in cervical conization

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 185-188 | Published online: 17 Nov 2010

References

  • Mathevet P, Dargent D, Roy M, Beau G. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: Cold knife, Laser and LEEP. Gynecologic Oncology 2004;54:175–9.
  • Huang LW, Huang J L. A comparison between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical dysplasia: Residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy specimen. Gynecologic Oncology 1999;73:12–5.
  • Houlard S, Perrotin F, Fourquet F. Risk factors for cervical stenosis after laser cone biops. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;104:144–7.
  • Favalli G, Lomini M, Schreiber C. The use of carbon dioxide laser surgery in the treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia of the uterine cervix. Przegl Lek. 1999;56:58–64.
  • Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J. Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop incision or laser conization. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:933–8.
  • Narducci F, Occeli B, Boman F. Positive margins after conization and risk of persistent lesion. Gynecologic Oncology 2000;76:311–4.
  • Andersen ES, Pedersen B, Nielsen K. Laser conization: the results of treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecologic Oncology 1994;54:201–4.
  • Hagen B, Skjeldestad FE, Bratt H. CO2 Laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II – III: Complications and efficacy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77:558–63.
  • Parakevaides E, Davidson E, Koliopoulos G. Bleeding after loop electrosurgical excison procedure preformed in either the follicular or luteal phase of the menstrual cycle: A randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:997–1000.
  • dos Santos L, Odunsi K, Lele S. Clinicopathologic outcomes of laser conization for high-grade cervical dysplasia. Eur J Gynecol Oncol. 2004;25:305–7.
  • Kamat A, Kramer P, Soisson A. Superiority of electrocautery over the suture method for achieving cervical cone bed hemostasis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:726–30.
  • Paraskevaides E, Kitchener HC, Malamou Mitsi V. Thermal tissue damage following laser and large loop conization of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84:752–4.
  • Diakomanolis E, Haidopoulos D, Rodolakis A. Treating intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix by laser CO2. Evaluation of the past, appraisal for the future. Eur J Gynecol Oncol. 2002;23:463–8.
  • Schemmel M, Haefner H, Selvaggi S. Comparison of the Ultrasonic scalpel to CO2 laser and electrosurgery in terms of tissue injury and adhesion formation in a rabbit model. Fertility and Sterility 1997;67:382–6.
  • Akahira J, Konno R, Morija T. Conization by Harmonic Scalpel for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A Clinicopathological Study. Gyn and Obstet Investigation 2000;50:264–8.
  • Konno R, Akahira J, Igarashi T: Conization of the cervix using harmonic scalpel. Tohoku J Exp Med.1999;189:171–8.
  • Boddy M, Ramsay S, Carter P. Tissue effects of an Ultrasonic Scalpel for clinical surgical use. Urolog Research 1987;15:49–52.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.