Cross-linked sodium hyaluronate, an anti-adhesion barrier gel in gynaecological endoscopic surgery

References

• Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, Clark D, Boyd JH, Finlayson AR, Knight AD, et al. Adhesion-related readmissions following gynaecological laparoscopy or laparotomy in Scotland: an epidemiological study of 24 046 patients. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1877–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, Ellis H, O’Brien F, Buchan S, Crowe AM. The impact of adhesions on hospital readmissions over ten years after 8849 open gynaecological operations: an assessment from the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study. Br J of Obstet Gynecol. 2000;107:855–62.
   Google Scholar
• diZerega GS, Tulandi T. Prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions in gynaecological surgery. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:303–6.
   Google Scholar
• Van Goor H. Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:25–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tingstedt B, Isaksson J, Andersson R. Long-term follow-up and cost analysis following surgery for small bowel obstruction caused by intra-abdominal adhesions. Br J Surg. 2007;94:743–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D. The SCAR-3 study: 5-year adhesion-related readmission risk following lower abdominal surgical procedures. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7:551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson MS. Cost and economics of adhesions. Hosp Med. 2004;65:343–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kössi J, Salminen P, Rantala A, Laato M. Population-based study of the surgical workload and economic impact of bowel obstruction caused by postoperative adhesions. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1441–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinas CR, Koninckx PR. Hypoxaemia induced by CO2 or helium Pneumoperitoneum is a cofactor in adhesion formation in rabbits. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1758–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Control and prevention of peritoneal adhesions in gynaecologic surgery. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:S1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhatia DS, Allen JE. The prevention of experimentally induced postoperative adhesions. Am Surgeon. 1997;63:775–7.
   Google Scholar
• Brown CB, Luciano AA, Martin D, Peers E, Scrimgeour A, diZerega GS. Adept Adhesion Reduction Study Group. Adept (icodextrin 4 % solution) reduces adhesions after laparoscopy surgery for adhesiolysis: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:1413–26; Ebub 2007 Mar 26.
   Google Scholar
• Trew G, Pistofidis G, Pados G, Lower A, Mettler L, Wallwiener D, et al. Gynaecological endoscopic evaluation of 4 % icodextrin solution: a European, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study of the efficacy and safety in the reduction of de novo adhesions after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2015–27; Epub 2011 Jun 1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baptista ML, Bonsack ME, Felemovicius I, Delaney JP. Abdominal adhesions to prosthetic mesh evaluated by laparoscopy and electron microscopy. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190:271–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Wong PF, Leaper DJ. Intra-peritoneal prophylactic agents for preventing adhesions and adhesive intestinal obstruction after non-gynaecological abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:CD005080.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson B. Efficacy of Interceed in adhesion prevention in gynaecologic surgery: a review of 13 clinical studies. J Reprod Med. 1996;41:27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn R, Lyman MD, Edelman PG, Campbell PK. Evaluation of the Spraygel adhesion barrier in the rat caecum abrasion and rabbit uterine horn adhesion models. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:411–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettler L, Audebert A, Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Schive-Peterhansl K, Jacobs VR. A randomized, prospective, controlled, multicenter clinical trial of a sprayable, site-specific adhesion barrier system in patients undergoing myomectomy. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:398–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettler L, Hucke J, Bojahr B, Tinneberg HR, Leyland N, Avelar R. A safety and efficacy study of a resorbable hydrogel for reduction of post-operative adhesions following myomectomy. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1093–100; Epub 2008 Mar 17.
   Google Scholar
• Wallwiener M, Brucker S, Hierlemann H, Brockhausen Ch, Solomayer E, Wallwiener Ch. Innovative barriers for peritoneal adhesion prevention: Liquid or solid? A rat uterine horn model. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:1266–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellicano M, Bramante S, Cirillo D, Palomba S, Bifulco G, Zullo F, et al. Effectiveness of autocrosslinked hyaluronic acid gel after laparoscopic myomectomy in infertile patients: a prospective, randomized, controller study. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:441–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWilde RL, Trew G. On behalf of the Expert Adhesions Working Party of the European Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE). Postoperative abdominal adhesions and their prevention in gynaecological surgery. Expert consensus position. Part 2-steps to reduce adhesions. Gynecol Surg. 2007;4:243–53.
   Google Scholar
• Trew G, Lower A. Consensus in adhesion reduction management. Obset Gynaecol. 2004;6:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Guida M, Acunzo G, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Bifulco G, Piccoli R, Pellicano M, et al. Effectiveness of auto-crosslinked hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1461–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acunzo G, Guida M, Pellicano M, Tommaselli GA, Di Spiezio Sardo A, et al. Effectiveness of auto-crosslinked hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1918–21.
   Google Scholar
• Frey C, Chanelles O, Poncelet C. How to prevent postoperative intrauterine adhesions? Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2010;38:550–2.
   Google Scholar
• Dubuisson J, Botchorishvili R, Perrette S, Bourdel N, Jardon K, Rabischong B, et al. Incidence of intraabdominal adhesions in a continous series of 1000 laparoscopic proecedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:111.e1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Beck DE, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, Kaufman HS, van Goor H, Wolff BG. A prospectve, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1310–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swank DJ, Swank-Bordewijk SCG, Hop WCJ, van Erp WFM, Janssen IMC, Bonjer HJ. Laparoscopic adehsiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain: a blinded randomised controlled multi-centre trial. Lancet. 2003;361:1247–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D, et al. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 1999;353:1476–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettler L. Manual for Laparoscopic and Hysteroscopic Gynecological Surgery. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd, 2006. p 3–184.
   Google Scholar