Application of a motion capture data glove for hand and wrist ergonomic analysis during laparoscopy

References

• De la Cruz F, De la Cruz JL. Bypass Gástrico por Laparoscopia. Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre Jesús Usón, editor. Cáceres, Spain: 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Khan MN, Fayyad T, Cecil TD, Moran BJ. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: the risk of postoperative infectious complications. JSLS. 2007;11:363–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD. Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:466–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matern U, Waller P, Giebmeyer C, Ruckauer KD, Farthmann EH. Ergonomics: requirements for adjusting the height of laparoscopic operating tables. JSLS. 2001;5:7–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berguer R, Chen J, Smith WD. A comparison of the physical effort required for laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. Arch Surg. 2003;138:967–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berguer R, Gerber S, Kilpatrick G, Remler M, Beckley D. A comparison of forearm and thumb muscle electromyographic responses to the use of laparoscopic instruments with either a finger grasp or a palm grasp. Ergonomics. 1999;42:1634–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berguer R, Smith WD, Chung YH. Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:1204–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haveran LA, Novitsky YW, Czerniach DR, Kaban GK, Taylor M, Gallagher-Dorval K, et al. Optimizing laparoscopic task efficiency: the role of camera and monitor positions. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:980–4.
   Google Scholar
• Matern U, Faist M, Kehl K, Giebmeyer C, Buess G. Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:436–40.
   Google Scholar
• van Veelen M, Meijer DW, Goossens RH, Snijders CJ. New ergonomic design criteria for handles of laparoscopic dissection forceps. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001;11:17–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berguer R, Remler M, Beckley D. Laparoscopic instruments cause increased forearm fatigue: A subjective and objective comparison of open and laparoscopic techniques. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 1997;6:36–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matern U, Kuttler G, Giebmeyer C, Waller P, Faist M. Ergonomic aspects of five different types of laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks: an electromyographic-based study. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1231–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matern U, Waller P. Instruments for minimally invasive surgery: principles of ergonomic handles. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:174–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inaki N, Kanehira E, Kinoshita T, Komai K, Omura K, Watanabe G. Ringed silicon rubber attachment prevents laparoscopic surgeon’s thumb. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1126–30.
   Google Scholar
• van Veelen MA, Meijer DW, Goossens RH, Snijders CJ, Jakimowicz JJ. Improved usability of a new handle design for laparoscopic dissection forceps. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:201–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanna GB, Shimi S, Cuschieri A. Influence of direction of view, target-to-endoscope distance and manipulation angle on endoscopic knot tying. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1460–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emam TA, Frank TG, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Influence of handle design on the surgeon’s upper limb movements, muscle recruitment, and fatigue during endoscopic suturing. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:667–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emam TA, Frank TG, Hanna GB, Stockham G, Cuschieri A. Rocker handle for endoscopic needle drivers. Technical and ergonomic evaluation by infrared motion analysis system. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:658–61.
   Google Scholar
• van Veelen MA, Meijer DW, Uijttewaal I, Goossens RH, Snijders CJ, Kazemier G. Improvement of the laparoscopic needle holder based on new ergonomic guidelines. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:699–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousek JB, Brown-Clerk B, Lowndes BR, Balogh BJ, Hallbeck MS. Optimizing integration of electrosurgical hand controls within a laparoscopic surgical tool. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012;21:222–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinyagin I, Biryukova E, Maier M. Kinematic and dynamic synergies of human precision-grip movements. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94:2284–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Margallo FM, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Pagador JB, Moyano-Cuevas JL, Moreno J, Usón J. Ergonomic assessment of hand movements in laparoscopic surgery using the CyberGlove®. Computational Biomechanics for Medicine Miller K, Nielsen PMF, Editors. New York: Springer, 2010. 121–8.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Duarte FJ, Lucas-Hernández M, Matos-Azevedo A, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Díaz-Güemes I, Sánchez-Margallo FM. Objective analysis of surgeons’ ergonomy during laparoendoscopic single-site surgery through the use of surface electromyography and a motion capture data glove. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1314–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wong JPY LR, Ma L. Virtual 3D sculpting. J Visual Comp Animat. 2000;11:155–66.
   Google Scholar
• Matern U. Ergonomic deficiencies in the operating room: examples from minimally invasive surgery. Work. 2009;33:165–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herring SR, Trejo AE, Hallbeck MS. Evaluation of four cursor control devices during a target acquisition task for laparoscopic tool control. Appl Ergon. 2010;41:47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes DA, Tang B, Cuschieri A. Minimal access surgery (MAS)-related surgeon morbidity syndromes. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun MH, Eoh H, Cho J. A two-dimensional dynamic finger modeling for the analysis of repetitive finger flexion and extension. Int J Ind Ergon. 2002;29:231–48.
   Google Scholar
• Wauben LS, van Veelen MA, Gossot D, Goossens RH. Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire survey of 284 surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1268–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar