Wireless vital signs from a life-supporting medical device exposed to electromagnetic disturbance

References

• Calcagnini G, Mattei E, Censi F, Triventi M, Lo Sterzo R, Marchetta E, et al. Electromagnetic compatibility of WLAN adapters with life-supporting medical devices. Health Phys. 2011;100:497–501.
   Google Scholar
• Chen M, Gonzalez S, Vasilakos A, Cao H. Body area networks: a survey. Mobile Netw Appl. 2010;16:171–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle J. Wireless technologies and patient safety in hospitals. Telemed J E Health. 2006;12:373–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lapinsky SE, Easty AC. Electromagnetic interference in critical care. J Crit Care. 2006;21:267–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEEE 11073-00101. Health informatics-PoC medical device communication. Part 00101: Guide-Guidelines for the use of RF wireless technology. New York, NY, USA: The Institute of Electical and Electronics Engineers, Inc; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bit-Babik G, Morrissey JJ, Faraone A, Balzano Q. Electromagnetic compatibility management of wireless transceivers in electromagnetc interference sensitive environments. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2007;43:218–24.
   Google Scholar
• Vallejos de Schatz CH, Medeiros HP, Schneider FK, Abatti PJ. Wireless medical sensor networks: design requirements and enabling technologies. Telemed J E Health. 2012;18:394–9.
   Google Scholar
• Halperin D, Anderson T, Wetherall D. Taking the sting out of carrier sense: interference cancellation for wireless LAN’s. Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom’08); 2008. 339–50.
   Google Scholar
• Hauer J, Handziski V, Wolisz A. Experimental study of the impact of WLAN interference on IEEE 802.15.4 body area networks. Proceedings of the 6th European conference on Wireless Sensor Networks (EWSN ’09); 2009. 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ko J, Gao T, Terziz A. Emirical study of a medical sensor application in an urban emergency department. Proceedings of the ICST 4th Conference on Body Area Networks (BodyNets ‘09). 2009. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ko J, Gao T, Rothman R, Terzis A. Wireless sensing systems in clinical environments: improving the efficiency of the patient monitoring process. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2010;29:103–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mangir T, Sarakbi L, Younan H. Analyzing the impact of Wi-Fi interference on ZigBee networks based on real time experiments. IJDPS. 2011;2:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Yang D, Xu Y, Gidlund M. Coexistence of IEEE 802.15.4 based networks: a survey. Proceedings of the 36th Annual conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON 2010); 2010. 2107–13.
   Google Scholar
• Angrisani L, Bertocco M, Fortin D, Sona A. Experimental study of coexistence issues between IEEE 802.11b and IEEE 802.15.4 wireless networks. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2008;57:1514–23.
   Google Scholar
• Gummadi R, Wetherall D, Greenstein B, Seshan S. Understanding and mitigating the impact of RF interference on 802.11 networks. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev. 2007;37:385–96.
   Google Scholar
• Javed Q, Prakash R. Exploring alternatives to channel change for improving coexistence of IEEE 802.15.4 and IEEE 802.11. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Mobile Ad-hoc Sensor Networks (MSN); 2012. 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• LaSorte N, Rajab S, Refai H. Developing a reproducible non-line-of-sight experimental setup for testing wireless medical device coexistence utilizing ZigBee. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012;59:3221–9.
   Google Scholar
• Liang C, Priyantha N, Liu J, Terzis A. Surviving Wi-Fi interference in low power ZigBee networks. New Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys ’10); 2010. 309–22.
   Google Scholar
• Mahalin N, Sharifa H, Suyed Yusof S, Fisal N, Rashid R. RSSI measrements for enabling IEEE 802.15.4 coexistence with IEEE 802.11 b/g. Proceedings of TENCON; 2009. 23–6.
   Google Scholar
• Mao Y, Zhao Z, Jia X. Understanding the indoor interference between IEEE 802.15.4 and IEEE 802.11.b/g via measurements. Proceedings of the 2011 international conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP); 2011. 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Polepalli B, Xie W, Thangaraja D, Goyal M, Hosseini HBY. Impact of IEEE 802.11n operation on IEEE 802.15.4 operation. Proceedings of the international conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA ’09); 2009. 328–33.
   Google Scholar
• Pollin S, Tan I, Hodge B, Chun C, Bahai A. Harmful coexistence between 802.15.4 and 802.11: a measurement-based study. Proceedings of the 3rd International conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications (CrownCom ‘08); 2008. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreed statistics: measurement method comparison. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:182–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quenot JP, Milesi C, Cravoisy A, Capellier G, Mimoz O, Fourcade O, et al. Intrahospital transport of critically ill patients (excluding newborns) recommendations of the Societe de Reanimation de Langue Francaise (SRLF), the Societe Francaise d’Anesthesie et de Reanimation (SFAR), and the Societe Francaise de Medecine d’Urgence (SFMU). Ann Intensive Care. 2012;2:1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rossi PJ, Edmiston CE Jr. Patient safety in the critical care environment. Surg Clin North Am. 2012;92:1369–86.
   Google Scholar
• Schweickert WD, Kress JP. Implementing early mobilization interventions in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU. Chest. 2011;140:1612–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voigt LP, Pastores SM, Raoof ND, Thaler HT, Halpern NA. Review of a large clinical series: intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: outcomes, timing, and patterns. J Intensive Care Med. 2009;24:108–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fanara B, Manzon C, Barbot O, Desmettre T, Capellier G. Recommendations for the intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2010;14:R87.
   Google Scholar
• Unverzagt S, Machemer MT, Solms A, Thiele H, Burkhoff D, Seyfarth M, et al. Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;CD007398.
   Google Scholar
• Øyri K, Støa S, Balasingham I, Fosse E. Short-range wireless sensor network for critical care monitoring. IJAACS. 2013;6:225–39.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. Medical devices directive 93/42/EEC. Official J Eur Union. 1993;L169:1–43.
   Google Scholar
• International Electrotechnical Commission I. Medical electrical equipment- Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral standard: electormagnetic compatibility- Requirements and tests. Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), 2007. Report No.: IEC 60601-1-2 - 3RD Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Baker SD, Hoglund D. Medical-grade, mission-critical wireless networks. designing an enterprise mobility solution in the healthcare environment. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2008;27:86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Lopez H, Afonso J, Correia J, Simoes R. The need for standardized tests to evaluate the reliability of data transport in wireless medical systems. In Martins F, Lopes L, Paulino H, editors. Sensor systems and software. Proceedings of the Third International ICST Conference on Sensor Systems and Software. 2012. 137–45.
   Google Scholar
• Baker SD, Knudsen J, Ahmadi DM. Security and safety for medical devices and hospitals. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2013;47:208–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qiu L, Bahl P, Rao A, Zohu L. Troubleshooting wireless mesh networks. AGM SIGCO MM Comput Commun Rev. 2006;36:17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Demrikol I, Ersoy C, Alagoz F. MAC protocols for wireless sensor networks: a survey. IEEE Commun Mag. 2006;44:115–21.
   Google Scholar
• Khan JY, Yuce MR, Bulger G, Harding B. Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN) design techniques and performance evaluation. J Med Syst. 2012;36:1441–57.
   Google Scholar