Impact of barbed suture in controlling the dorsal vein complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

References

• AHeidenreich, PJBastian, JBellmunt, MBolla, SJoniau, Tvan der Kwast, et al. EAU Guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and localtreatment with curative intent-update 2013. EurUrol. 2014;65:124–37.
   Google Scholar
• WMassound, RThanigasalam, AEl Hajj, FGirard, PETheveniaud, GChatellier, et al. Does the use of barbed polyglyconate absorbable suture have an impact on urethral anastomosis time, urethral stenosis rates, and cost effectiveness during robotassisted radical prostatectomy? Urology. 2013;82:90–4.
   Google Scholar
• JRassweiler, MSchulze, DTeber, RMarrero, OSeemann, JRumpelt, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: oncological resultsin the first 500 patients. J Urol. 2005;173:761–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JRassweiler, MCRassweiler, HKenngott, TFrede, MSMichel, PAlken, et al. The past, present and future of minimally invasive therapy in urology: a review andspeculative outlook. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2013;22:200–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JRassweiler, RMarrero, AHammady, TErdogru, DTeber, TFrede. Transperitoneallaparoscopic radical prostatectomy: ascending technique. J Endourol. 2004;18:593–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• JRassweiler, MHruza, TFrede, DTeber. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal ascending nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: an effective and safe technique for apical tumors. J Endourol. 2008;22:2009–13.
   Google Scholar
• MMNguyen, TTurna, BRSantos, RFrota, MAron, RJStein, et al. The use of an endoscopic stapler vs suture ligature for dorsal vein control in laparoscopic prostatectomy: operative outcomes. BJU Int. 2007;101:463–6.
   Google Scholar
• FPorpiglia, CFiori, SGrande, IMorra, RMScarpa. Selective versus standard ligature of the deep venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: effects on continence, blood loss, and margin status. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1377–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASGözen, MArslan, MSchulze, JRassweiler. Comparison of laparoscopic closure of the bladder with barbed polyglyconate versus polyglactin suture material in the pig bladder model: an experimental in vitro study. J Endourol. 2012;26:732–6.
   Google Scholar
• ARPolland, JAGraversen, ACMues, KKBadani. Polyglyconate unidirectional barbed suture for posterior reconstruction and anastomosis during robot-assisted prostatectomy: effect on procedure time, efficacy, and minimum 6-month follow-up. J Endourol. 2011;25:1493–6.
   Google Scholar
• SShikanov, MWille, MLarge, DALifshitz, KCZorn, ALShalhav, et al. Knotless closure of the collecting system and renal parenchyma with a novel barbedsuture during laparoscopic porcine partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2009;23:1157–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PJZondervan, ASGozen, DOpondo, JJRassweiler, JJde la Rosette, MPLaguna. Partial nephrectomy: Is there an advantage of the self-retaining barbed suture in the perioperative period? A matched case-control comparison. World J Urol. 2012;30:659–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• THvan der Kwast, MBAmin, ABillis, JIEpstein, DGriffiths, PAHumphrey, et al. ISUP Prostate Cancer Group: International Society of Urological Pathology(ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical ProstatectomySpecimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume. Mod Pathol. 2011;24:16–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAtes, DTeber, ASGozen, ATefekli, MHruza, MSugiono, et al. A New Postoperative predictor of time to urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the urine loss ratio. Eur Urol. 2007;52:178–85.
   Google Scholar
• MHruza, HOWeiss, GPini, ASGoezen, MSchulze, DTeber, et al. Complications in 2200 consecutive laparoscopic radical prostatectomies: standardised evaluation and analysis of learning curves. Eur Urol. 2010;58:733–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JWalz, AGallina, FSaad, FMontorsi, PPerrotte, SFShariat, et al. Nomogram predicting 10-year life expectancy in candidates for radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3576–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MHruza, JLBermejo, BFlinspach, MSchulze, DTeber, HJRumpelt, et al. Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2013;111:271–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GDaouacher, MWaldén. A simple reconstruction of the posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter and sparing of puboprostatic collar reduces the time to early continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2014;28:481–6.
   Google Scholar
• TGondo, KYoshioka, THashimoto, YNakagami, RHamada, TKashima, et al. The powerful impact of double-layered posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction on early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2012;26:1159–64.
   Google Scholar
• NYassine, AHouchani. The pre-looped intracorporeal knot: a new technique for knot tying in laparoscopic surgery. J Urol. 2001;166:195–7.
   Google Scholar
• SCAbreu, MRubinstein, FIMessias, RSArgollo, GAGuedes, MBAraújo, et al. Use of titanium knot placement device (TK-5) to secure dorsal vein complex duringlaparoscopic radical prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy. Urology. 2006;67:190–4.
   Google Scholar
• SDWu, JJMeeks, JCashy, KTPerry, RBNadler. Suture versus staple ligation of the dorsal venous complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2010;106:385–90.
   Google Scholar
• YLei, MAlemozaffar, SBWilliams, NHevelone, SRLipsitz, BAPlaster, et al. Athermaldivision and selective suture ligation of the dorsal vein complex duringrobot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique andoutcomes. Eur Urol. 2011;59:235–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JFBorin, DWSkarecky, NNarula, TEAhlering. Impact of urethral stump lengton continence and positive surgical margins in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology. 2007;70:173–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar