Visualisation, tracking and navigation of instruments for MRI-guided interventional procedures

References

• Ladd M. E. Principles of Passive Visualization. Interventional magnetic resonance imaging, J F Debatin, G Adam. Springer, Heidelberg 1998; 35–43
   Google Scholar
• Ladd M E, Erhart P, Debatin J. F., et al. Biopsy needle susceptibility artifacts. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 646–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Martin A J, Truwit C. L. Interventional MRI at high-field (1.5 T): needle artifacts. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 214–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin J S, Duerk J L, Jain V. R., et al. Needle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 1337–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker C J, Hoogeveen R M, Hurtak W. F., et al. MR-guided endovascular interventions: susceptibility-based catheter and near-real-time imaging technique. Radiology 1997; 202: 273–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker C J, Smits H F, Bos C., et al. MR-guided balloon angioplasty: in vitro demonstration of the potential of MRI for guiding, monitoring, and evaluating endovascular interventions. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 245–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frahm C, Gehl H B, Melchert U H, Weiss H. D. Visualization of magnetic resonance-compatible needles at 1.5 and 0.2 Tesla. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1996; 19: 335–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehl H-B, Frahm C. Passive visualization of needles. Interventional magnetic resonance imaging, J F Debatin, G Adam. Springer, Heidelberg 1998; 45–9
   Google Scholar
• Lee T H, Anzai Y, Lufkin R. B. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided needle biopsy of head and neck lesions. West J Med 1993; 159: 69
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewin J S, Merkle E M, Duerk J L, Tarr R. W. MR-guided percutaneous sclerotherapy of low flow vascular malformations: safety and feasibility [Abstract]. ISMRM Proceedings April, 1998; 18–24, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin J S, Petersilge C A, Hatem S. F., et al. Interactive MR imaging-guided biopsy and aspiration with a modified clinical C-arm system. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 1593–601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lufkin R, Teresi L, Hanafee W. New needle for MR-guided aspiration cytology of the head and neck. Am J Roentgenol 1987; 149: 380–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lufkin R, Teresi L, Chiu L, Hanafee W. A technique for MR-guided needle placement. Am J Roentgenol 1988; 151: 193–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller P R, Stark D D, Simeone J. F., et al. MR-guided aspiration biopsy: needle design and clinical trials. Radiology 1986; 161: 605–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin D L, Ratner A V, Young S. W. Magnetic susceptibility effects and their application in the development of new ferromagnetic catheters for magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 1990; 25: 1325–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenck J. F. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996; 23: 815–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peal M RV, Shimizu K. Needle-tip tracking: real-time MR imaging using a projection reconstruction scheme [Abstract]. ISMRM Proceedings, Vancouver, BC, April 12–18, 1997, 1803
   Google Scholar
• Shimizu K, Mulkern R V, Oshio K., et al. Rapid tip tracking with MRI by a limited projection reconstruction technique. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 262–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits H FM, Bakker C. J. Susceptibility-based catheter visualization. Interventional magnetic resonance imaging, J F Debatin, G Adam. Springer, Heidelberg 1998; 51–5
   Google Scholar
• Trapp T, Lufkin R, Abemayor E., et al. A new needle and technique for MRI-guided aspiration cytology of the head and neck. Laryngoscope 1989; 99: 105–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unal O, Korosec F R, Frayne R., et al. A rapid 2D time-resolved variable-rate k-space sampling MR technique for passive catheter tracking during endovascular procedures. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40: 356–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Weide R, Zuiderveld K J, Bakker C. J., et al. Image guidance of endovascular interventions on a clinical MR scanner. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 17: 779–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt M, Busch M, Lenz G., et al. Dynamic tracking in interventional MRI using wavelet-encoded gradient- echo sequences. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 17: 803–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkle E M, Wendt M, Chung Y. C., et al. Pulssequenzen und Visualisierung von instrumenten. Der Radiologe 1998; 38: 185–93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petersilge C A, Lewin J S, Duerk J L, Hatem S F.M. Rarthrography of the shoulder: rethinking traditional imaging procedures to meet the technical requirements of MR imaging guidance. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 1453–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin J S, Duerk J L, Petersilge C. A., et al. Interactive MRI for procedure guidance on a clinical C-arm system: a pilot study. ISMRM Proceedings, New York, NY, April 27-May, 1996, 1803
   Google Scholar
• Newman R, Penner E. A. External referencing systems. Interventional magnetic resonance imaging, J F Debatin, G Adam. Springer, Heidelberg 1998; 83–91
   Google Scholar
• Black P M, Moriarty T, Alexander E., et al. Development and implementation of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and its neurosurgical applications. Neurosurgery 1997; 41: 831–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu L, Fried M P, Jolesz F. A. MR-guided endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19: 1235–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derbyshire J A, Wright G A, Henkelman R M, Hinks R. S. Dynamic scan-plane tracking using MR position monitoring. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 924–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan M J, Erickson R K, Levin D. N., et al. Frameless stereotaxy with real-time tracking of patient head movement and retrospective patient-image registration. J Neurosurg 1996; 85: 287–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriarty T M, Kikinis R, Jolesz F. A., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging therapy. Intraoperative MR imaging. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1996; 7: 323–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschberg H. Implementation of a stereotactic microscope using an optically coupled tracking system. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1996; 66: 96–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenck J F, Jolesz F A, Roemer P. B., et al. Superconducting open-configuration MR imaging system for image-guided therapy. Radiology 1995; 195: 805–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Kaczynski K, Schulz R., et al. A passive optical localization system for MR guidance of interventional procedures. ISMRM Proceedings. April 27-May, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Lee M H, Lufkin R B, Borges A., et al. MR-guided procedures using contemporaneous imaging frameless stereotaxis in an open-configuration system. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22: 998–1005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lufkin R, Duckwiler G, Spickler E., et al. MR body stereotaxis: an aid for MR-guided biopsies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988; 12: 1088–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas D G, Doshi P, Colchester A., et al. Craniotomy guidance using a stereo-video-based tracking system. Stereotact Fund Neurosurg 1996; 66: 81–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glowinski A. Field inhomogeneity-based catheter visualization. Interventional magnetic resonance imaging, J F Debatin, G Adam. Springer, Heidelberg 1998; 57–63
   Google Scholar
• Adam G, Glowinski A, Neuerburg J., et al. Visualization of MR-compatible catheters by electrically induced local inhomogeneities: evaluation in vivo. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 209–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glowinski A, Adam G, Bucker A, et al. Catheter visualization using locally induced, actively controlled field inhomogeneities. Magn Reson Med 1997; 38: 253–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam G, Glowinski A, Neuerburg J., et al. [Catheter visualization in MR-tomography: initial experimental results with field-inhomogeneity catheters]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1997; 166: 324–8
   Google Scholar
• Adam G. Intravascular applications of field inhomo-geneity catheters: in vivo results. Interventional magnetic resonance imaging, J F Debatin, G Adam. Springer, Heidelberg 1998; 263–8
   Google Scholar
• Dumoulin C L, Souza S P, Darrow R. D. Real-time position monitoring of invasive devices using magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med 1993; 29: 411–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumoulin C. L. Active visualization — MR tracking. Interventional magnetic resonance imaging, J F Debatin, G Adam. Springer, Heidelberg 1998; 65–75
   Google Scholar
• Wendt M, Busch M, Wetzler R., et al. Shifted rotated keyhole imaging and active tip-tracking for interventional procedure guidance. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 258–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd M E, Zimmermann G G, McKinnon G. C., et al. Visualization of vascular guidewires using MR tracking. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 251–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung D A, Debatin J F, Wildermuth S., et al. Real-time biplanar needle tracking for interventional MR imaging procedures. Radiology 1995; 197: 485–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasche V, Holz D, Kohler J., et al. Catheter tracking using continuous radial MRI. Magn Reson Med 1997; 37: 963–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin A J, McLoughlin R F, Chu K. C., et al. An expandable intravenous RF coil for arterial wall imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 226–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner P, Erhart P, Heske N., et al. Active biplanar MR tracking for biopsies in humans. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 735–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick H H, Ladd M E, Hilfiker P. R., et al. Autoperfused balloon catheter for intravascular MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9: 428–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann-Paul G G, Quick H H, Vogt P., et al. High-resolution intravascular magnetic resonance imaging: monitoring of plaque formation in heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits. Circulation 1999; 99: 1054–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann G G, Quick H H, Hilfiker P. R., et al. [Intravascular MR imaging: the first in-vivo experiences in an animal arteriosclerosis model]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1997; 167: 180–6
   Google Scholar
• Wildermuth S, Zimmermann G G, Debatin J. F. [Vascular applications of interventional MRI.]. Radiologe 1998; 38: 210–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin A J, Henkelman R. M. Intravascular MR imaging in a porcine animal model. Magn Reson Med 1994; 32: 224–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd M E, Erhart P, Debatin J. F., et al. Guidewire antennas for MR fluoroscopy. Magn Reson Med 1997; 37: 891–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd M. E. Active visualization — MR profiling. Interventional magnetic resonance imaging, J F Debatin, G Adam. Springer, Heidelberg 1998; 77–82
   Google Scholar
• Wildermuth S, Debatin J F, Leung D. A., et al. MR imaging-guided intravascular procedures: initial demonstration in a pig model. Radiology 1997; 202: 578–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildermuth S, Erhart P, Leung D. A., et al. [Active instrumental guidance in interventional MR tomography: introduction to a new concept]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1998; 169: 77–84
   Google Scholar
• Ladd M E, Zimmermann G G, Quick H. H., et al. Active MR visualization of a vascular guidewire in vivo. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 220–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Wendt M, Shankaranarayanan A., et al. A multiplexed active tip tracking system with automated scan plane definition for interventional MRI on a 0.2T MR imager. ISMRM Proceedings, SydneyAustralia, April 18–24, 1998, 687
   Google Scholar
• Debatin J F, Wildermuth S. Intravascular interventions with active MR tracking. Interventional magnetic resonance imaging, J F Debatin, G Adam. Springer, Heidelberg 1998; 269–82
   Google Scholar
• Dumoulin C. L. Active tracking of interventional devices. Interventional MRI, R Lufkin. Mosby, Inc., Los Angeles 1998; 144–53
   Google Scholar
• Erhart P, Ladd M E, Steiner P., et al. Tissue-independent MR tracking of invasive devices with an internal signal source. Magn Reson Med 1998; 39: 279–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung D A, Debatin J F, Wildermuth S., et al. Intravascular MR tracking catheter preliminary experimental evaluation. Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164: 1265–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin A J, Plewes D B, Henkelman R. M. MR imaging of blood vessels with an intravascular coil. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992; 2: 421–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon G C, Debatin J F, Leung D. A., et al. Towards active guidewire visualization in interventional magnetic resonance imaging. MAGMA 1996; 4: 13–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang Q, Wendt M, Zheng L., et al. A novel inductively coupled RF coil system and automatic image segmentation for active MR invasive device tip tracking. ISMRM Proceedings. 1999
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Duerk J L, Zheng L, et al. A new target-navigated active MR tip-tracking system. RSNA. 1998; 616–282, RSNA98, 282
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann-Paul G G, Ladd M E, Pfammatter T, et al. MR versus fluoroscopic guidance of a catheter/ guidewire system: in vitro comparison of steerability. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 1177–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann G G, Quick H H, Debatin J. F. Intravascular MRI. Interventional magnetic resonance imaging, J F Debatin, G Adam. Springer, Heidelberg 1998; 283–93
   Google Scholar