Interaction between persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities and their partners: A literature review

References

• Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, M. (2003). Socio-communicative variables and behavior states in students with profound and multiple disabilities: Descriptive data from school settings. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 200– 219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, M. (2004). Patterns amongst behavior states, sociocommunicative, and activity variables in educational programs for students with profound and multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 16, 125– 149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur-Kelly, M., Bochner, S., Center, Y., & Mok, M. (2007). Socio-communicative perspectives on research and evidence-based practice in the education of students with profound and multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 19, 161– 176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur-Kelly, M., Foreman, P., Bennett, D., & Pascoe, S. (2008). Interaction, inclusion and students with profound and multiple disabilities: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 8, 161– 166.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg, K., West, D., & Iacono, T. A. (2003). PICTURE IT: An evaluation of a training program for carers of adults with severe and multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 28, 260– 282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, J. A., Standen, P. J., & Cromby, J. J. (1991a). Interactions between adults with profound intellectual disability and staff. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 17, 377– 389.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, J. A., Standen, P. J., & Cromby, J. J. (1991b). The analysis of talk sessions between staff and adults with profound intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 17, 391– 400.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, J. A., Standen, P. J.& Jones, G. (1996). Striking the balance: A grounded theory analysis of staff perspectives. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35, 249– 264.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research. A guide for literature reviews, (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cozby, P. C. (2003). Methods in behavioral research, (8th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Crittenden, P. M., & Claussen, A. H. (2000). The organization of attachment relationships: Maturation, culture, and context, Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daelman, M. (2003). Een analyse van de presymbolische communicatie bij blinde kinderen met een meervoudige handicap, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
   Google Scholar
• Davis, P. K., Young, A., Cherry, H., Dahman, D.,& Rehfeldt, R. A. (2004). Increasing the happiness of individuals with profound multiple disabilities: Replication and extension. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 531– 534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Waele, I., & Van Hove, G. (2005). Modern times: An ethnographic study on the quality of life of people with a high support need in a Flemish residential facility. Disability & Society, 20, 625– 639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, S., Upadhyaya, S., & Stanley, B. (2002). Using an interdisciplinary approach to training to develop the quality of communication with adults with profound learning disabilities by care staff. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 37, 41– 57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favell, J. E., Realon, R. E., & Sutton, K. A. (1996). Measuring and increasing the happiness of people with profound mental retardation and physical handicaps. Behavioral Interventions, 11, 47– 58.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, W. M. L., Antaki, C., Walton, C., & Stribling, P. (2008). The dilemma for staff in ‘playing a game’ with a person with profound intellectual disabilities: Empowerment, inclusion and competence in interactional practice. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30, 531– 549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogel, A. (1993). Developing through relationships. Origins of communication, self, and culture, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foreman, P., Arthur-Kelly, M., Pascoe, S.,& King, B. S. (2004). Evaluating the educational experiences of students with profound and multiple disabilities in inclusive and segregated classroom settings: An Australian perspective. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 29, 183– 193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, S., & Iacono, T. (2008). Disability support workers' experience of interaction with a person with profound intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 33, 137– 147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, S., & Eng, S. (2005). Gaga over Google? Scholar in the social sciences. Library Hi Tech News, 22 (8), 42– 45.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, N., Bunning, K., Porter, J., & Olsson, C. (1999). ‘See what I mean’: Interpreting the meaning of communication by people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 12, 190– 203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, D., & Noonan Walsh, P. (2007). Communication among nurses and adults with severe and profound intellectual disabilities: Predicted and observed strategies. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 11, 127– 141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hile, M. G., & Walbran, B. B. (1991). Observing staff-resident interactions: What staff do, what residents receive. Mental Retardation, 29, 35– 41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Janssen, M. J., Riksen-Walraven, J. M., & Van Dijk, J. P. M. (2003). Toward a diagnostic intervention model for fostering harmonious interactions between deaf-blind children and their educators. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 197– 214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubinski, R., (1981). Speech, language, and audiology programs in home health care agencies and nursing homes. In Beasley D. S. & Davis G. A. ( Eds.), Aging: Communication processes and disorders. ( pp. 339– 356. New York: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, G. (2005). The Life Satisfaction Matrix: An instrument and procedure for assessing the subjective quality of life of individuals with profound multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 766– 769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, C., & Stoljar, N. (2000). Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maes, B., Lambrechts, G., Hostyn, I., & Petry, K. (2007). Quality-enhancing interventions for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A review of the empirical research literature. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 32, 163– 178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollum, J. A., & McBride, S. L. (1997). Ratings of parent–infant interaction: Raising questions of cultural validity. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 17, 494– 519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey, R., Morris, I., & Purcell, M. (1999). Communications between staff and adults with intellectual disabilities in naturally occurring settings. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 43, 194– 205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwen, I. R. (1992). Assistive positioning as a control parameter of social-communicative interactions between students with profound multiple disabilities and classroom staff. Physical Therapy, 72, 634– 644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakken, H., & Vlaskamp, C. (2002). Joining forces: Supporting individuals with profound multiple learning disabilities. Tizard Learning Disability Review, 7 (3), 10– 15.
   Google Scholar
• Nedelsky, J. (1989). Reconceiving autonomy: Sources, thoughts and possibilities. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 1, 7– 36.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, C. (2004). Dyadic interaction with a child with multiple disabilities: A system theory perspective on communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 228– 242.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, C. (2005). The use of communicative functions among pre-school children with multiple disabilities in two different setting conditions: Group versus individual patterns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 3– 18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, M. M. (2003). Relating improvisational music therapy with severely and multiply disabled children to communication development. Journal of Music Therapy, 40, 227– 246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petry, K., & Maes, B. (2007). Description of the support needs of people with profound multiple disabilities using the 2002 AAMR system: An overview of literature. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 130– 143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petry, K., Maes, B., & Vlaskamp, C. (2005). Domains of quality of life of people with profound multiple disabilities: The perspective of parents and direct support staff. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18, 35– 46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide, Malden MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, J., Emerson, E., Gregory, N., Hatton, C., Kessissoglou, S., & Hallam, A. et al. (2001). Social networks of people with mental retardation in residential settings. Mental Retardation, 39, 201– 214.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schalock, R. L. (2004). The concept of quality of life: What we know and do not know. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48, 203– 216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepis, M. M., & Reid, D. H. (1995). Effects of a voice output communication aid on interactions between support personnel and an individual with multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 73– 77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seys, D., Duker, P., Salemink, W., & Franken-Wijnhoven, J. (1998). Resident behaviors and characteristics as determinants of quality of residential care: An observational study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 19, 261– 273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel-Causey, E., & Bashinski, S. M. (1997). Enhancing initial communication and responsiveness of learners with multiple disabilities: A tri-focus framework for partners. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 12, 105– 120.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries. A political argument for an ethic of care, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, P. J., & Kretschmer, R. R. (1999). How adult beliefs shape the speech communities of a child who has multiple disabilities. Mental Retardation, 37, 395– 406.
   Google Scholar
• Vlaskamp, C., de Geeter, K. I., Huijsmans, L. M., & Smit, I. H. (2003). Passive activities: The effectiveness of multisensory environments on the level of activity of individuals with profound multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16, 135– 143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder, J., Axelsson, C., & Granlund, M. (2004). Parent–child interaction: A comparison of parents' perceptions in three groups. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 1313– 1322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder, J., & Granlund, M. (2003). Behaviour style and interaction between seven children with multiple disabilities and their caregivers. Child: Care, Health and Development, 29, 559– 567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2001). ICF: International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar