Comparison of Vitek identification and antifungal susceptibility testing methods to DNA sequencing and Sensititre YeastOne antifungal testing

References

• Horn DL, Neofytos D, Anaissie EJ, . Epidemiology and outcomes of candidemia in 2019 patients: data from the prospective antifungal therapy alliance registry. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 15: 1695–1703.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis RE. Overview of the changing epidemiology of candidemia. Curr Med Res Opin 2009; 25: 1732–1740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; CLSI document M27-S3. Wayne, PA:CLSI, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Davey K, Szekeley A, Johnson E, Warnock D. Comparison of a new commercial colorimetric microdilution method with a standard method for in-vitro susceptibility testing of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998; 42: 439–444.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Espinel-Ingroff A, Pfaller M, Messer S, . Multicenter comparison of the Sensititre YeastOne Colorimetric Antifungal panel with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M27-A reference method for testing of clinical isolates of common and emerging Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp., and other yeasts and yeast-like organisms. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37: 591–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaller M, Espinel-Ingroff A, Jones R. Clinical evaluation of the Sensititre YeastOne Colorimetric antifungal plate for antifungal susceptibility testing of the new triazoles, voriconazole, posaconazole and ravuconazole. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42: 4577–4580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinel-Ingroff A, Pfaller M, Messer S, . Multicenter comparison of the Sensititre YeastOne Colorimetric Antifungal panel with the NCCLS M27-A2 reference method for testing new antifungal agents against clinical isolates of Candida spp. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42: 718–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; CLSI document M27-A3. Wayne, PA:CLSI, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• De Baere T, Van Keerberghen A, Van Hauwe P, . An interlaboratory comparison of ITS2-PCR for the identification of yeasts, using the ABI Prism 310 and CEQ8000 capillary electrophoresis systems. BMC Microbiol 2005; 18: 14.
   Google Scholar
• Graf B, Adam T, Zill E, Göbel UB. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid identification of yeasts and yeast-like organisms. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 1782–1785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loïez C, Wallet F, Sendid B, Courcol RJ. Evaluation of VITEK 2 colorimetric cards versus fluorimetric cards for identification of yeasts. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2006; 56: 455–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubertine CL, Rivera M, Rohan SM, Larone DH. Comparative study of the new colorimetric VITEK 2 yeast identification card versus the older fluorometric card and of CHROMagar Candida as a source medium with the new card. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44: 227–228.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meurman O, Koskensalo A, Rantakokko-Jalava K. Evaluation of VITEK 2 for identification of yeasts in the clinical laboratory. Clin Microbiol Infect 2006; 12: 591–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenza G, Strasen J, Schäfer F, . Evaluation of new colorimetric Vitek 2 yeast identification card by use of different source media. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46: 3784–3787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanguinetti M, Porta R, Sali M, . Evaluation of VITEK 2 and RapID yeast plus systems for yeast species identification: experience at a large clinical microbiology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45: 1343–1346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massonet C, Van Eldere J, Vaneechoutte M, . Comparison of VITEK 2 with ITS2-fragment length polymorphism analysis for identification of yeast species. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42: 2209–2211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Procop GW, Rinaldi MG. Multicenter comparison of the Vitek 2 yeast susceptibility test with the CLSI broth microdilution reference method for testing fluconazole against Candida spp. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45: 796–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posteraro B, Martucci R, La Sorda M, . Reliability of the Vitek 2 yeast susceptibility test for detection of in vitro resistance to fluconazole and voriconazole in clinical isolates of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata. J Clin Microbiol 2009; 47: 1927–1930.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bourgeois N, Dehandschoewercker L, Bertout S, . Antifungal susceptibility of 205 Candida spp. primarily isolated during invasive candidiasis. Comparison of the Vitek 2 system with CLSI microdilution and Etest methods. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48:154–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaller M A, Diekema DJ, Procop GW, Rinaldi MG. Multicenter comparison of the Vitek 2 antifungal susceptibility test with the CLSI broth microdilution reference method for testing amphotericin B, flucytosine, and voriconazole against Candida spp. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45: 3522–3528.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cuenca-Estrella M, Gomez-Lopez A, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, . Comparison of the Vitek 2 antifungal susceptibility system with the CLSI and the EUCAST broth microdilution reference methods and with the Sensititre Yeast-One and the Etest techniques for the detection in vitro of antifungal resistance in yeasts. J Clin Microbiol 2010 Mar 10 [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar