Automatic intelligibility assessment of pathologic speech over the telephone

References

• Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P, Cornut G, Crevier-Buchman L, Friedrich G, . Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS). A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;258:77–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubuisson T, Dutoit T, Gosselin B, Remacle M. On the use of the correlation between acoustic descriptors for the normal/pathological voices discrimination. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing; Analysis and Signal Processing of Oesophageal and Pathological Voices. 2009; 2009:19 pages. DOI:10.1155/2009/173967.
   Google Scholar
• Moran R, Reilly R, de Chazal P, Lacy P. Telephony-based voice pathology assessment using automated speech analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006;53:468–77.
   Google Scholar
• van Gogh CDL, Festen JM, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Parker AJ, Traissac L, Cheesman AD, . Acoustical analysis of tracheoesophageal voice. Speech Commun. 2005;47:160–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilakis M, Stylianou Y. Voice pathology detection based eon [sic] short-term jitter estimations in running speech. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2009;61:153–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malyska N, Quatieri T, Sturim D. Automatic dysphonia recognition using biologically-inspired amplitude-modulation features. Proc IEEE Int Conf on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). Vol I. IEEE: Philadelphia, PA; 2005. 873–6.
   Google Scholar
• Umapathy K, Krishnan S, Parsa V, Jamieson DG. Discrimination of pathological voices using a time-frequency approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005;52:421–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberstam B. Acoustic and perceptual parameters relating to connected speech are more reliable measures of hoarseness than parameters relating to sustained vowels. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2004;66:70–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckström T, Lehto L, Alku P, Vilkman E. Automatic pre-segmentation of running speech improves the robustness of several acoustic voice measures. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2003;28:101–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hogikyan ND, Sethuraman G. Validation of an instrument to measure voice- related quality of life (V-RQOL). J Voice. 1999;13:557–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haderlein T, Riedhammer K, Nöth E, Toy H, Schuster M, Eysholdt U, . Application of automatic speech recognition to quantitative assessment of tracheoesophageal speech in different signal quality. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2009;61: 12–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier A, Haderlein T, Stelzle F, Nöth E, Nkenke E, Rosanowski F, . Automatic speech recognition systems for the evaluation of voice and speech disorders in head and neck cancer. EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing. 2010;2010:7.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster M, Haderlein T, Nöth E, Lohscheller J, Eysholdt U, Rosanowski F. Intelligibility of laryngectomees’ substitute speech: automatic speech recognition and subjective rating. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;263:188–93.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzing P, Maier A, Åhlander VL. Automatic speech recognition (ASR) and its use as a tool for assessment or therapy of voice, speech, and language disorders. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2009;34:91–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananthakrishnan S, Narayanan S. An automatic prosody recognizer using a coupled multi-stream acoustic model and a syntactic-prosodic language model. Proc Int Conf on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP). Vol I. IEEE: Philadelphia, PA; 2005. 269–72.
   Google Scholar
• Batliner A, Buckow J, Niemann H, Nöth E, Warnke V. The prosody module. Wahlster W. Verbmobil: foundations of speech-to-speech translation. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2000. 106–21.
   Google Scholar
• Chen K, Hasegawa-Johnson M, Cohen A, Borys S, Kim S-S, Cole J, . Prosody dependent speech recognition on radio news corpus of American English. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process. 2006;14:232–45.
   Google Scholar
• Gallwitz F, Niemann H, Nöth E, Warnke V. Integrated recognition of words and prosodic phrase boundaries. Speech Commun. 2002;36:81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Nöth E, Batliner A, Kießling A, Kompe R, Niemann H. Verbmobil: the use of prosody in the linguistic components of a speech understanding system. IEEE Trans Speech Audio Process. 2000;8:519–32.
   Google Scholar
• Maier A. Speech of children with cleft lip and palate: automatic assessment [dissertation]. Studien zur Mustererkennung. Vol 29. Berlin: Logos Verlag; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Haderlein T, Nöth E, Toy H, Batliner A, Schuster M, Eysholdt U, . Automatic evaluation of prosodic features of tracheoesophageal substitute voice. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;264:1315–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 2008. Available at: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3 (accessed 14 Jun 2011).
   Google Scholar
• International Phonetic Association. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. London: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Stemmer G. Modeling variability in speech recognition [dissertation]. Studien zur Mustererkennung. Vol 19. Berlin: Logos Verlag; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Arias-Londoño JD, Godino-Llorente JI, Markaki M, Stylianou Y. On combining information from modulation spectra and mel-frequency cepstral coefficients for automatic detection of pathological voices. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2011;36:60–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schukat-Talamazzini EG, Niemann H, Eckert W, Kuhn T, Rieck S. Automatic speech recognition without phonemes. Proc European Conf on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech). Berlin: European Speech Communication Association (ESCA); 1993. 129–32.
   Google Scholar
• Batliner A, Fischer K, Huber R, Spilker J, Nöth E. How to find trouble in communication. Speech Commun. 2003;40: 117–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smola AJ, Schölkopf B. A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and Computing. 2004;14:199–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witten IH, Frank E. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. 2nd. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Zenner HP. The postlaryngectomy telephone intelligibility test (PLTT). Herrmann IF. Speech restoration via voice prosthesis. Berlin: Springer; 1986. 148–52.
   Google Scholar
• Haderlein T, Riedhammer K, Maier A, Nöth E, Toy H, Rosanowski F. An automatic version of the post-laryngectomy telephone test. Matoušek V, Mautner P. Proc 10th Int Conf Text, Speech and Dialogue (TSD 2007). Vol. 4629. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2007. 238–45.
   Google Scholar
• Wilpon JG, Jacobsen CN. A study of speech recognition for children and the elderly. IEEE Int Conf on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. IEEE: Atlanta, Georgia; 1996. 349–52.
   Google Scholar