Aerodynamic measures of speech in unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) patients

References

• Baylor C, Yorkston K, Strand E, Eadie T, Duffy J. Measurement of treatment outcome in unilateral vocal fold paralysis: a systematic review. Seattle: Academy of Neurologic Communication Disorders and Sciences (ANCDS) and American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA); 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Sulica L, Cultrara A, Blitzer A. Vocal fold paralysis: causes, outcomes, and clinical aspects. In: Sulica L, Blitzer A, editors. Vocal fold paralysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2006. p. 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Dejonckere P, Bradley P, Clemente M, Cornut G, Buchman L, Friedrich G, . A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques: Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngology. 2001;258:77–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billante C, Clary J, Childs P, Netterville J. Voice gains following thyroplasty may improve over time. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2002;27:89–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havas T, Lowinger D, Priestley J. Unilateral vocal fold paralysis: causes, options and outcomes. Aust N Z J Surg. 1999;69:509–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morsomme D, Jamart J, Wéry C, Giovanni A, Remacle M. Comparison between the GIRBAS scale and the acoustic and aerodynamic measures provided by EVA for the assessment of dysphonia following unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2001;53:317–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hans S, Vaissiére J, Buchman L, Laccourreye O, Brasnu D. Aerodynamic and acoustic parameters in CO2 laser posterior transverse cordotomy for bilateral vocal fold paralysis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000;120:330–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yumoto E, Nakano K, Oyamada Y. Relationship between 3D behavior of the unilaterally paralyzed larynx and aerodynamic vocal function. Acta Otolaryngol. 2003;123:274–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartl DM, Hans S, Vaissiére J, Brasnu DF. Objective acoustic and aerodynamic measures of breathiness in paralytic dysphonia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngology. 2003;260:175–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baken R, Orkiloff R. Clinical measurement of speech and voice. 2nd ed. San Diego: Singular; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler A, Bottero A, Capaccio P, Ginocchio D, Adorni F, Ottaviani F. Vocal improvement after voice therapy in unilateral vocal fold paralysis. J Voice. 2008;22:113–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothenberg M. A new inverse-filtering technique for deriving the glottal air flow waveform during voicing. J Acoust Soc Am. 1973;53:1632–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcin A, Abberton E. Hearing and phonetic criteria in voice measurement: clinical applications. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2007;33:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadle C. Aerodynamics of speech, and the puzzle of voiced fricatives. Conference on Phonetic Universals; Leipzig, Germany; 2010. (Conference: October 29–30).
   Google Scholar
• Rothenberg M, Mahshie J. Monitoring vocal fold abduction through vocal fold contact area. J Speech Hear Res. 1988;31:338–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirano M, & Mori K. (2000). Vocal Fold Paralysis. In R. Kent & M. Ball (Eds.), Voice Quality Measurement (pp. 385-395). San Diego (California): Singular.
   Google Scholar
• Jesus LMT, Barney A, Santos R, Caetano J, Jorge J, Couto PS. Universidade de Aveiro’s Voice Evaluation Protocol. 10th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech 2009); Brighton, UK; 2009. (Conference: September 6-10).
   Google Scholar
• Svec JG, Granqvist S. Guidelines for selecting microphones for human voice production research. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010;19:356–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma P. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International. 2001;5:341–5.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer R, Vail V, Guo C. Required number of tokens to determine representative voice perturbation values. J Speech Hear Res. 1995;38:1260–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller M, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:319–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesus LMT, Shadle CH. A parametric study of the spectral characteristics of European Portuguese fricatives. J Phon. 2002;30:437–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirello K, Blumstein S, Kurowski K. The characteristics of voicing in syllable-initial fricatives in American English. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;101:3754–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinho CMR, Jesus LMT, Barney A. Weak voicing in fricative production. J Phon. 2012 (in press).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladefoged P. Speculations on the control of speech In: Hardcastle W, Beck J, editors. A figure of speech: a festschrift for John Laver. Mahwah: LEA; 2005. p. 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Lahiri A, Gewirth L, Blumstein S. A reconsideration of acoustic invariance for place of articulation in diffuse stop consonants: evidence from a cross-language study. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984;76:391–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladefoged P, Johnson K. A course in phonetics. 6th ed. Scarborough: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Trujillo-Ortiz A, Hernandez-Walls R, Trujillo-Perez RA. RMAOV2: Two-way repeated measures ANOVA. 2004. Available from: http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/5578. Accessed February 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mauchly JW. Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 1940;11:204–9.
   Google Scholar
• Trujillo-Ortiz A, Hernandez-Walls R. Cochtest: Cochran’s test for homogeneity of variances for equal or unequal sample sizes. 2003. Available from: http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/3292. Accessed February 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Huynh H. Some approximate tests for repeated measurement designs. Psychometrika. 1978;43:161–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trujillo-Ortiz A. Anfactpc: factor analysis by the principal components method. 2006. Available from: http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/10601-anfactpc. Accessed February 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bielamowicz S, Kapoor R, Schwartz J, Stager SV. Relationship among glottal area, static supraglottic compression, and laryngeal function studies in unilateral vocal fold paresis and paralysis. J Voice. 2004;18:138–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart C, Allen E. Voice therapy for unilateral vocal fold paralysis. In: Sulica L, Blitzer A, editors Vocal fold paralysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2006. p. 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Oguz H, Demirci M, Safak M, Arslan N, Islam A, Kargin S. Effect of unilateral vocal cord paralysis on objective voice measures obtained by Praat. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;264:257–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice. Vienna: Springer-Verlag; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Kempster G, Gerratt B, Abbott K, Kraemer J, Hillman R. Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009;18:124–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone D, McFarlane S, Berg S, Zraick R. The voice and voice therapy. 8th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kent R, Kent J, Rosenbek J. Maximum performance tests of speech production. J Speech Hear Disord. 1987;52:367–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verdolini K. Diagnosis in speech-language pathology. In: Tomblin J, Morris H, Spriestersbach D, editors. Voice disorders. San Diego: Singular; 1994. p. 247–306.
   Google Scholar
• Pindzola R. VAP: a voice assessment protocol for children and adults [manual]. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1987.
   Google Scholar