References
- Speech Technologies—Bibliography. Available at: http://liceu.uab.es/˜joaquim/speech_technology/tecnol_parla/speech_tech_general/refs_gen_tecnol_parla.html (accessed 9 November 2012).
- Keller E. Improvements in speech synthesis: COST 258: the naturalness of synthetic speech. Chichester, UK/New York: J Wiley; 2002.
- Eide E, Bakis R, Hamza W, Pitrelli JF. Towards expressive synthetic speech. In: Narayanan S, Alwan A, editors. Text to speech synthesis: new paradigms and advances. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2005.
- Narayanan S, Alwan A. Text to speech synthesis: new paradigms and advances. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2005.
- Tatham M, Morton K. Expression in speech: analysis and synthesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.
- Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Informa Healthcare. Available at: http://informahealthcare.com/loi/aac/ (accessed 6 November 2012).
- AAC Journal. Communication Matters. Available at: http://www.communicationmatters.org.uk/page/aac-journal (accessed 6 November 2012).
- Dundee AAC Research Group. Available at: http://aac.computing.dundee.ac.uk/ (accessed 6 November 2012).
- AAC-RERC—Spread the word. Available at: http://aac-rerc.psu.edu/ (accessed 6 November 2012).
- AAC Research Unit at the University of Stirling. Available at: http://www.aacscotland.stir.ac.uk/about.htm (accessed 6 November 2012).
- Bercow J. The Bercow review: a review of services for children and young people (0-19) with speech, language and communication needs. Rt Hon John Bercow MP, Member of Parliament for Buckingham. Available at: http://www.johnbercow.co.uk/bercowreview (accessed 6 November 2012).
- AAC Evidence Base Project. Communication Matters. Available at: http://www.communicationmatters.org.uk/page/aac-evidence-base-project (accessed 6 November 2012).
- Pistorius M, Davies ML. Ghost boy. Johannesburg: Simon & Schuster/Jonathan Ball; 2011.
- Wickenden M. Whose voice is that?: issues of identity, voice and representation arising in an ethnographic study of the lives of disabled teenagers who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC). Disability Studies Quarterly; 2011. Available at: http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1724/1772 (accessed 9 November 2012).
- Wickenden M. Listen to us too. Available at: http://cscy.group.shef.ac.uk/knowledge/ListenToUsToofinalJune2011 mw.pdf (accessed 9 November 2012).
- Baxter S, Enderby P, Evans P, Judge S. Barriers and facilitators to the use of high-technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012; 47:115–29.
- Judge S, Townend G. Users’ perceptions of communication aid design. Project report. Devices for Dignity; 2010.
- Mirenda P, Beukelman D. A comparison of speech synthesis intelligibility with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 1987;3(3): 120–8.
- Reynolds M, Jefferson L. Natural and synthetic speech comprehension: comparison of children from two age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 1999;15(3): 174–82.
- Newell C. Place, authenticity, and time: a framework for liveness in synthetic speech. Chapter 5. Unpublished thesis. University of York; 2009.
- Interactive TTS demo. Available at: http://www.loquendo.com/en/demo-center/interactive-tts-demo/ (accessed 6 November 2012).