Standardization of nasalance scores in normal Saudi speakers

References

• Kummer AW. Nasometry. In: Kummer AW, editor. Cleft palate and craniofacial anomalies: effects on speech and resonance. 2nd ed. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Leeper H, Rochet A, MacKay I. Characteristics of nasalance in Canadian speakers of English and French. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Banff, AB, Canada; 1992. p. 49–52.
   Google Scholar
• Okalidou A, Karathanasi A, Griogoraki E. Nasalance norms in Greek adults. Clin Linguist Phon. 2011;25:671–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaver EJ, Dalston RM, Leeper HA, Adams LE. A study of nasometric values for normal nasal resonance. J Speech Hear Res. 1991;34:715–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nichols A. Nasalance statistics for two Mexican populations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999;36:57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson RT. Nasometric values for normal Spanish- speaking females: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996;33:333–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haapanen ML. Nasalance scores in normal Finnish speech. Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1991;43:197–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lierde KM, Wuyts FL, De Bodt M, Van Cauwenberg P. Nasometric values for normal nasal resonance in the speech of young Flemish adults. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001; 38:112–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschberg J, Bok S, Juhasz M, Trenovszki Z, Votisky P, Hirshberg A. Adaptation of nasometry to Hungarian language and experiences with its clinical application. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;70:785–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden P, Hobbel HH, Van der Laan BF, Korsten-Meijer AG, Goorhuis-Brouwer SM. Nasometry normative data for young Dutch children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;75:420–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh M, Fee E, Kalinowski J. Nasometric values for three dialectical groups within the Atlantic Provinces of Canada. J Speech Lang Path Aud. 1994;18:7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Abou-Elsaad T, Quriba A, Baz H, Elkassaby R. Standardization of nasometry for normal Egyptian Arabic speakers. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 2013;64:271–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Weijer JC, Slis IH. Nasaliteitsmeting met de Nasometer. Logopedie en Foniatrie. 1991;63:97–101.
   Google Scholar
• Prathanee B, Thanaviratananich S, Pongjunyakul A, Rengpatanakij K. Nasalance scores for speech in normal Thai children. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2003;37:351–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tachimura T, Mori C, Hirata S, Wada T. Nasalance score variation in normal adult Japanese speakers of Mid-West Japanese dialect. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000; 37:463–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo R, Floyd LA, Warren DW, Dalston RM, Mayo MC. Nasalance and nasal area values: cross-racial studies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996;33:143–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay IRA, Kummer AW. The MacKay Kummer SNAP Test. Lincoln Park, NJ: Kay Elemetrics Corp; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Kay Elemetrics Corporation. Instruction manual of the Nasometer model 6200-3, IBM PC verson. Lincoln Park, NJ: Kay Elemetrics; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Dalston RM, Neiman GS, Gonzalez-Landa G. Nasometric sensitivity and specificity: a cross-dialect and cross-culture. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993;30:285–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogen Esch TT, Dejonckere PH. Objectivating nasality in healthy and velopharyngeal insufficient children with the Nasalance Acquisition System (NasalView). Defining minimal required speech tasks assessing normative values for Dutch language. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2004; 68:1039–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soneghet R, Santos RP, Behlau M, Habermann W, Friedrich G, Stamberg H. Nasalance changes after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. J Voice. 2002;16:392–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen LHP, Allegro J, Low A, Parsin B, Campisi P. Effect of cochlear implantation on nasality in children. Ear Nose Throat J. 2008;87:138–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fale I, Hub Farira I. Nasometric values for European Portuguese: preliminary results.In: Proceeding of the 2nd ISCA Workshop on Experimental Linguistics, 25–27 August. Athens, Greece; 2008. p. 85–8.
   Google Scholar
• Litzaw LL, Dalston RM. The effect of gender upon nasalance scores among normal adult speakers. J Commun Disord. 1992;25:55–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehill LT. Nasalance measures in Cantonese speaking women. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38:119–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallino-Napolli LD, Montgomery AA. Examination of the standard nasalance scores in subjects with cleft palate: implication for clinical use. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997;34:512–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shprintzen R, Bardach J. Cleft palate speech management: a multidisciplinary approach. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Gooze J, Murdoch B, Theodoros D, Thompson E. The effect of age and gender on laryngeal aerodynamics. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders. 1998; 33:221–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKerns D, Bzoch KR. Variation in velopharyngeal valving; the factor of sex. Cleft Palate J. 1970;7:652–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson AE, Hixon TJ. Nasal air flow during normal speech production. Cleft Palate J. 1979;16:412–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Doorn J, Purcell A. Nasalance levels in speech of normal Australian children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998;35:287–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney T, Sell D, O’Regan M. Nasalance scores for normal-speaking Irish children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;41:168–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher SG. Nasalance versus listener judgments of nasality. Cleft Palate J. 1976;13:31–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen MY. Acoustic correlates of English and French nasalized vowels. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;102:2360–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell-Berti F. Nasometric values for normal Spanish-speaking females: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1980; 33:333–6.
   Google Scholar