SAPS 3 is not superior to SAPS 2 in cardiac surgery patients

References

• Piacentini E, Ferrer C. Scoring prognostic system: to predict or not to predict. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78: 149–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS 2) based on a European/North American multicenter study. J Am Med Assoc. 1993;270: 2957–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metnitz PG, Moreno RP, Almeida E, Jordan B, Bauer P, Campos RA, et al. SAPS 3 – from evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part1: objectives, methods and cohort description. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:1336–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno RP, Metnitz PG, Almeida E, Jordan B, Bauer P, Campos RA, et al. SAPS 3 - from evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:1345–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss YG, Merin G, Koganov E, Ribo A, Oppenheim-Eden A, Medalion B, et al. Post cardiopulmonary bypass hypoxemia: a prospective study on incidence, risk factors, and clinical significance. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2000;14: 506–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakr Y, Krauss C, Amaral AC, Réa-Neto A, Specht M, Reinhart K, Marx G. Comparison of the performance of SAPS 2, SAPS 3, APACHE II, and their customized prognostic models in a surgical intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:798–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerr F, Badreldin AM, Heldwein MB, Bossert T, Richter M, Lehmann T, et al. A comparative study of four intensive care outcome prediction models in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;6:21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Metnitz PG, Valentin A, Vesely H, Alberti C, Lang T, Lenz K, et al. Prognostic performance and customization of the SAPS 2: results of a multicenter Austrian study. Simplified Acute Physiology Score. Intensive Care Med. 1999;2:192–7.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno R, Miranda DR, Fidler V, Van Schilfgaarde R. Evaluation of two outcome prediction models on an independent database. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:50–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metnitz PG, Vesely H, Valentin A, Popow C, Hiesmayr M, Lenz K, et al. Evaluation of an interdisciplinary data set for national intensive care unit assessment. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:1486–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aegerter P, Boumendil A, Retbi A, Minvielle E, Dervaux B, Guidet B. SAPS 2 revisited. Intensive Care Med. 2005; 31:416–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popovich MJ. If most intensive care units are graduating with honors, is it genuine quality or grade inflation?Crit Care Med. 2002;30:2145–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand K, Flaatten H. Severity scoring in the ICU: a review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52:467–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno RP, Metnitz PG, Metnitz B, Bauer P, Afonso de Carvalho S, Hoechtl A; SAPS 3 Investigators. Modeling in-hospital patient survival during the first 28 days after intensive care unit admission A prognostic model for clinical trials in general critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2008;23: 339–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares M, Salluh JI. Validation of the SAPS 3 admission prognostic model in patients with cancer in need of intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:1839–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledoux D, Canivet JL, Preiser JC, Lefrancq J, Damas P. SAPS 3 admission score: an external validation in a general intensive care population. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:1873–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole D, Rossi C, Latronico N, Rossi G, Finazzi S, Bertolini G, GiViTI. Comparison between SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in predicting hospital mortality in a cohort of 103 Italian ICUs. Is new always better? Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:1280–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juneja D, Singh O, Nasa P, Dang R. Comparison of newer scoring systems with the conventional scoring systems in general intensive care population. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78:194–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekmat K, Kroener A, Stuetzer H, Schwinger RH, Kampe S, Bennink GB, Mehlhorn U. Daily assessment of organ dysfunction and survival in intensive care unit cardiac surgical patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1555–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:707–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salciccioli JD, Cristia C, Chase M, Giberson T, Graver A, Gautam S, et al. Performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 Scores in post-cardiac arrest. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78: 1341–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann JE, Draper EA, Wagner DP. Comparing ICU populations: background and current methods. In: Sibbald WJ, Bion JF, eds. Evaluating critical care. Berlin: Springer Verlag 2001. pp. 121–39.
   Google Scholar
• Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Zimmerman JE, Bergner M, Bastos PG, et al. The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest. 1991;100:1619–36.
   Google Scholar
• Badreldin AM, Kroener A, Heldwein MB, Doerr F, Vogt H, Ismail MM, et al. Prognostic value of daily cardiac surgery score (CASUS) and its derivatives in cardiac surgery patients. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;58:392–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerr F, Badreldin AM, Bender EM, Heldwein MB, Lehmann T, Bayer O, et al. Outcome prediction in cardiac surgery: the first logistic scoring model for cardiac surgical intensive care patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78:879–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar