Clinical and radiographic outcomes of total hip replacement with poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine)-grafted highly cross-linked polyethylene liners: Three-year results of a prospective consecutive series

References

• Willert HG, Bertram H, Buchhorn GH. Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip. The role of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;258:95–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk TB, Wilson AS, Stachowiak GW. The morphology and composition of the superficial zone of mammalian articular cartilage. J Orthop Rheumatol. 1993;6:21–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills BA. Boundary lubrication in vivo. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 2000;214:83–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moro T, Takatori Y, Ishihara K, Konno T, Takigawa Y, Matsushita T, et al. Surface grafting of artificial joints with a biocompatible polymer for preventing periprosthetic osteolysis. Nat Mater. 2004;3(11): 829–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moro T, Takatori Y, Ishihara K, Nakamura K, Kawaguchi H. Grafting of biocompatible polymer for longevity of artificial hip joints. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moro T, Kyomoto M, Ishihara K, Saiga K, Hashimoto M, Tanaka S, et al. Grafting of poly (2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) on polyethylene liner in artificial hip joints reduces production of wear particles. J Mechan Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;31:100–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moro T, Takatori Y, Kyomoto M, Ishihara K, Hashimoto M, Ito H, et al. Long-term hip simulator testing of the artificial hip joint bearing surface grafted with biocompatible phospholipid polymer. J Orthop Res. 2014;32(3):369–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kyomoto M, Moro T, Saiga K, Hashimoto M, Ito H, Kawaguchi H, et al. Biomimetic hydration lubrication with various polyelectrolyte layers on cross-linked polyethylene orthopedic bearing materials. Biomaterials. 2012;33(18):4451–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myers GJ, Johnstone DR, Swyer WJ, McTeer S, Maxwell SL, Squires C, et al. Evaluation of Mimesys phosphorylcholine (PC)-coated oxygenators during cardiopulmonary bypass in adults. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2003;35(1):6–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuiper KK, Nordrehaug JE. Early mobilization after protamine reversal of heparin following implantation of phosphorylcholine-coated stents in totally occluded coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85(6):698–702.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selan L, Palma S, Scoarughi GL, Papa R, Veeh R, Di Clemente D, Artini M. Phosphorylcholine impairs susceptibility to biofilm formation of hydrogel contact lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009; 147(1):134–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snyder TA, Tsukui H, Kihara S, Akimoto T, Litwak KN, Kameneva MV, et al. Preclinical biocompatibility assessment of the EVAHEART ventricular assist device: Coating comparison and platelet activation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;81(1):85–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takatori Y, Moro T, Kamogawa M, Oda H, Morimoto S, Umeyama T, et al. Poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine)-grafted highly cross-linked polyethylene liner in primary total hip replacement: one-year results of a prospective cohort study. J Artif Organs. 2013;16(2):170–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972;54(1):61–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Imura S. Evaluation chart of hip join functions. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1995;69:860–7.
   Google Scholar
• Fujisawa M, Naito M, Asayama I. A comparative study of hip joint functional scoring systems between Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip score and Harris hip score. Seikeigeka. 2001;52: 628–33 (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Nagai I, Takatori Y, Kuruta Y, Moro T, Karita T, Mabuchi A, Nakamura K. Nonself-centering Bateman bipolar endoprosthesis for nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a 12- to 18-year follow-up study. J Orthop Sci. 2002;7(1):74–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sutherland CJ, Wilde AH, Borden LS, Marks KE. A ten-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive Müller curved-stem total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(7):970–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engh CA Jr, Stepniewski AS, Ginn SD, Beykirch SE, Sychterz-Terefenko CJ, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA. A randomized prospective evaluation of outcomes after total hip arthroplasty using cross-linked marathon and non-cross-linked Enduron polyethylene liners. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(Suppl 2):17–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hui AJ, McCalden RW, Martell JM, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH. Validation of two and three-dimensional radiographic techniques for measuring polyethylene wear after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(3):505–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gill HS, Murray DW. The creep and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene: a three-year randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(5):556–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calvert GT, Devane PA, Fielden J, Adams K, Horne JG. A double-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(4):505–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lachiewicz PF, Heckman DS, Soileau ES, Mangla J, Martell JM. Femoral head size and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene at 5 to 8 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(12):3290–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whittaker JP, Charron KD, McCalden RW, Macdonald SJ, Bourne RB. Comparison of steady state femoral head penetration rates between two highly cross-linked polyethylenes in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(5):680–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Capello WN, D’Antonio JA, Ramakrishnan R, Naughton M. Continued improved wear with an annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(3):825–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Udomkiat P, Wan Z, Dorr LD. Comparison of preoperative radiographs and intraoperative findings of fixation of hemispheric porous-coated sockets. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83A(12):1865–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kyomoto M, Moro T, Konno T, Takadama H, Kawaguchi H, Takatori Y, et al. Effects of photo-induced graft polymerization of 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine on physical properties of cross-linked polyethylene in artificial hip joints. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18(9):1809–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collier JP, Currier BH, Kennedy FE, Currier JH, Timmins GS, Jackson SK, Brewer RL. Comparison of cross-linked polyethylene materials for orthopaedic applications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;414:289–304.
   Google Scholar
• Medel FJ, Peña P, Cegoñino J, Gómez-Barrena E, Puértolas JA. Comparative fatigue behavior and toughness of remelted and annealed highly crosslinked polyethylenes. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;83(2):380–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kärrholm J, Herberts P, Hultmark P, Malchau H, Nivbrant B, Thanner J. Radiostereometry of hip prostheses. Review of methodology and clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;344:94–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilling M, Larsen K, Andersen NT, Søballe K, Kold S, Rahbek O. The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. A study of validity and reliability. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(5):570–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moro T, Kawaguchi H, Ishihara K, Kyomoto M, Karita T, Ito H, et al. Wear resistance of artificial hip joints with poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) grafted polyethylene: Comparisons with the effect of polyethylene cross-linking and ceramic femoral heads. Biomaterials. 2009;30(16):2995–3001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurtz SM, Kocagöz S, Arnholt C, Huet R, Ueno M, Walter WL. Advances in zirconia toughened alumina biomaterials for total joint replacement. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014; 31:107–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar