References
- ANVISA. (2005). Lei de Biossegurança, D.O.U. DE 28/03/2005. 11.105: P.1.
- Bankowski, B.J., Lyerly, A.D., Faden, R.R., Wallach, E.E. (2005). The social implications of embryo cryopreservation. Fertility and Sterility, 84, 823–832.
- Borini, A., Cattoli, M., Bulletti, C., Coticchio, G. (2008). Clinical efficiency of oocyte and embryo cryopreservation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1127, 49–58.
- Brzyski, R.G. (1998). Efficacy of postal communication with patients who have cryopreserved pre-embryos. Fertility and Sterility, 70, 949–951.
- CFM (1992). Normas éticas para a utilização das técnicas de reprodução assistida, Conselho Federal de Medicina. CFM n° 1.358/92.
- Darlington, N., Matson, P. (1999). The fate of cryopreserved human embryos approaching their legal limit of storage within a West Australian in-vitro fertilization clinic. Human Reproduction, 14, 2343–2344.
- de Lacey, S. (2005). Parent identity and ‘virtual’ children: why patients discard rather than donate unused embryos. Human Reproduction, 20, 1661–1669.
- de Lacey, S. (2007a). Decisions for the fate of frozen embryos: fresh insights into patients' thinking and their rationales for donating or discarding embryos. Human Reproduction, 22, 1751–1758.
- de Lacey, S. (2007b). Patients' attitudes to their embryos and their destiny: social conditioning? Best Practice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 21, 101–112.
- Elford, K., Lawrence, C., Leader, A. (2004). Research implications of embryo cryopreservation choices made by patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 81, 1154–1155.
- Fuscaldo, G., Russell, S., Gillam, L. (2007). How to facilitate decisions about surplus embryos: patients' views. Human Reproduction, 22, 3129–3138.
- Fuscaldo, G., Savulescu, J. (2005). Spare embryos: 3000 reasons to rethink the significance of genetic relatedness. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 10, 164–168.
- Greenfeld, D.A., Klock, S.C. (2004). Disclosure decisions among known and anonymous oocyte donation recipients. Fertility and Sterility, 81, 1565–1571.
- Hammarberg, K., Tinney, L. (2006). Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: a survey of couples' decisions and the factors influencing their choice. Fertility and Sterility, 86, 86–91.
- Hug, K. (2008). Motivation to donate or not donate surplus embryos for stem-cell research: literature review. Fertility and Sterility, 89, 263–277.
- Klock, S.C. (2004). Embryo disposition: the forgotten “child” of in vitro fertilization. International Journal of Fertility and Women's Medicine, 49, 19–23.
- Kovacs, G.T., Breheny, S.A., Dear, M.J. (2003). Embryo donation at an Australian university in-vitro fertilisation clinic: issues and outcomes. The Medical Journal of Australia, 178, 127–129.
- Laruelle, C. Englert, Y. (1995). Psychological study of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer participants' attitudes toward the destiny of their supernumerary embryos. Fertility and Sterility, 63, 1047–1050.
- Lornage, J., Chorier, H., Boulieu, D., Mathieu, C., Czyba, J.C. (1995). Six year follow-up of cryopreserved human embryos. Human Reproduction, 10, 2610–2616.
- Lyerly, A.D., Steinhauser, K., Namey, E., Tulsky J.A., Cook-Deegan, R., Sugarman, J., et al (2006). Factors that affect infertility patients' decisions about disposition of frozen embryos. Fertility and Sterility, 85, 1623–1630.
- McMahon, C.A., Gibson, F.L., Leslie, G.I., Saunders, D.M., Porter, K.A., Tennant, C.C. (2003). Embryo donation for medical research: attitudes and concerns of potential donors. Human Reproduction, 18, 871–877.
- McMahon, C.A., Saunders, D.M. (2009). Attitudes of couples with stored frozen embryos toward conditional embryo donation. Fertility and Sterility, 91, 140–147.
- Nachtigall, R.D., Becker, G., Friese, C. Butler, A., MacDougall, K. (2005). Parents' conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision. Fertility and Sterility, 84, 431–434.
- Parry, S. (2006). (Re)constructing embryos in stem cell research: exploring the meaning of embryos for people involved in fertility treatments. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 2349–2359.
- Provoost, V., Pennings, G., De Sutter, P., Gerris, J., Van de Velde, A., De Lissnyder, E., et al (2009). Infertility patients' beliefs about their embryos and their disposition preferences. Human Reproduction, 24, 896–905.
- Revel, A., Safran, A., Laufer, N., Lewin, A., Reubinov, B.E., Simon, A. (2004). Twin delivery following 12 years of human embryo cryopreservation: case report. Human Reproduction, 19, 328–329.
- Robertson, J.A. (1995). Ethical and legal issues in human embryo donation. Fertility and Sterility, 64, 885–894.
- Soderstrom-Anttila, V., Foudila, T., Ripatti, U.R., Siegberg, R. (2001). Embryo donation: outcome and attitudes among embryo donors and recipients. Human Reproduction, 16, 1120–1128.
- Svanberg, A.S., Boivin, J., Bergh, T. (2001). Factors influencing the decision to use or discard cryopreserved embryos. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 80, 849–855.
- Trounson, A., Mohr, L. (1983). Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature, 305(5936, 707–709.
- Zweifel, J., Christianson, M., Jaeger, A.S., Olive, D., Lindheim, S.R. (2007). Needs assessment for those donating to stem cell research. Fertility & Sterility, 88, 560–564.