Publication Cover
Human Fertility
an international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice
Volume 13, 2010 - Issue 1
265
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Attitudes to Single Embryo Transfer and Multiple Births

Attitudes towards single embryo transfer, twin and higher order pregnancies in patients undergoing infertility treatment: a review

&
Pages 28-34 | Published online: 08 Feb 2010

References

  • Blennborn, M., Nilson, S., Hillervik, C., Hellberg, D. (2005). The couple's decision-making in IVF: one or two embryos at transfer? Human Reproduction, 20, 1292–1297.
  • Child, T., Henderson, A.M., Tan S.L. (2004). The desire for multiple pregnancy in male and female infertility patients. Human Reproduction, 1, 558–561.
  • Cutting, R., Morroll, D., Roberts, S.A., Pickering, S., Rutherford, A. (2008). Elective single embryo transfer: guidelines for practice British fertility society and association of clinical embryologists. Human Fertility, 11, 131–146.
  • El Toukhy, T., Khalaf, Y., Braude, P. (2006). Optimize not maximize. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 194, 322–331.
  • Garel, M., Blondel, B., Karpel, L., Blanchet, V., Breart, G., Frydman, R., et al (2008). Patient attitudes towards twin pregnancies and SET: a questionnaire study. Human Reproduction, 23, 1232–1238.
  • Gerris, J. (2007). The near elimination of triplets in IVF. Reproductive Bio Medicine Online, 15, (Suppl. 3), 40–44.
  • Gleicher, N., Campbell, D.P., Chan, C.L., Karande, V., Rao, R., Balin, M., et al (1995). The desire for multiple births in couples with infertility problems contradicts current practice patterns. Human Reproduction, 10, 1079–1084.
  • Goldfarb, J., Kinzer, D.J., Boyle, M., Kurit, D. (1996). Attitudes of in vitro fertilisation and intrauterine insemination couples toward multiple gestation pregnancy and multifetal pregnancy reduction. Fertility and Sterility, 65, 815–820.
  • Grobman, W.A., Milad, M.P., Stout, J., Klock, S.C. (2001). Patient perceptions of multiple gestations: an assessment of knowledge and risk aversion. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 185, 920–924.
  • Hartshorne, G.M., Lilford, R.J. (2002). Different perspectives of patients and health care professionals on the potential benefits and risks of blastocyst culture and multiple embryo transfer. Human Reproduction, 17, 1023–1030.
  • Hojgaard, A., Ottosen, L.D.M., Kesmodel, U., Ingerslev, H.J. (2007). Patient attitudes towards twin pregnancies and single embryo transfer – a questionnaire study. Human Reproduction, 22, 2673–2678.
  • Human Fertilisation and Embryo Authority (2009). Your guide to the changes. Are you ready for the 8th edition of the code of practice, updated consent forms and directions?, London: HFEA.
  • Kalra, S.K., Milad, M.P., Klock, S.C., Gribman, W.A. (2003). Infertility patients and their partners: differences in the desire for twin gestations. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 102, 152–155.
  • Kosmas, I., Van der Elst, J., Devroey, P., Tournaye, H. (2008). Elective single embryo transfer. The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist, 10, 163–169.
  • Land, J.A., Evers, J.L.H. (2003). Risks and complications in assisted reproductive techniques: report of an ESHRE consensus meeting. Human Reproduction, 18, 455–457.
  • Ledger, W.L., Anumba, D., Marlow, N., Thomas, C.M., Wilson, E.C. (2006). The costs to the NHS of multiple births after IVF treatment in the UK. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 113, 21–25.
  • Leiblum, S.R., Kemmann, E., Taska, L. (1990). Attitudes toward multiple births and pregnancy concerns in infertile and non-infertile women. Journal of Psychiatric Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 11, 197–210.
  • Murray, S., Shetty, A., Taylor, V., Bhattacharya, S. (2004). A randomised comparison of alternative methods of information provision on the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer. Human Reproduction, 19, 911–916.
  • Newton, C.R., McBride, J., Feyles, V., Tekpetey, F., Power, S. (2007). Factors affecting patients' attitudes toward single- and multiple-embryo transfer. Fertilty and Sterility, 87, 269–278.
  • Olivennes, F., Frydman, R. (1998). Friendly IVF: the way of the future? Human Reproduction, 13, 1121–1124.
  • Pinborg, A., Loft, A., Schmidt, L., Andersen, A.N. (2003). Attitudes of IVF/ICSI-twin mothers towards twins and single embryo transfer. Human Reproduction, 18, 621–627.
  • Porter, M., Bhattacharya, S. (2005). Investigation of staff and patients' opinions of a proposed trial of elective single embryo transfer. Human Reproduction, 20, 2523–2530.
  • Ryan, G.L., Zhang, S.H., Dokras, A., Syrop, C.H., Van Voorhis, B.J. (2004). The desire of infertile patients for multiple births. Fertility and Sterility, 81, 500–503.
  • Ryan, G.L., Sparks, A.E.T., Sipe, C.S., Syrop, C.H., Dokras, A., Van Voorhis, B.J. (2007). A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates. Fertilty and Sterility, 88, 354–360.
  • Scotland, G.S., McNamee, P., Peddie, V.L., Bhattacharya, S. (2007). Safety versus success in elective single embryo transfer: women's preferences for outcomes of in vitro fertilisation. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 114, 977–983.
  • Steel, J.A., Sutcliffe, A. (2009). Long-term health implications for children conceived by IVF/ICSI. Human Fertility, 12, 21–27.
  • Twisk, M., van der Veen, F., Repping, S., Heineman, M. (2007). Preferences of subfertile women regarding elective single embryo transfer: additional in vitro fertilisation cycles are acceptable, lower pregnancy rates are not. Fertility and Sterility, 88, 1006–1009.
  • Van Peperstraten, A.M., Nelen, W.L.D.M., Hermens, R.P.M.G., Jansen, L., Scheenjes, E., Braat, D.D.M., et al (2008). Why don't we perform elective single embryo transfer? A qualitative study among IVF patients and professionals. Human Reproduction, 23, 2036–2042.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.